China's SCS Strategy Thread

defenceman

Junior Member
Registered Member
Hi,
is it true Indian Navy and Philippines Navy were doing exercises in that area. may be
that’s the reason DDG was present with CCG in the disputed area
thank you
 

RoastGooseHKer

Junior Member
Registered Member
The collision video has been taken down from Chinese internet. I don't understand what's the big deal of it,it's just an accident. Military units accidentally hit by friendly fire all the time all around the world,the is no shame about it.
Because it is indeed a very shameful mistake/friendly fire incident confirmed by an adversary. This adds to the humiliation. However, I am against censoring the video. Chinese citizens have the right to see it and demand the PLA and CCG do better during the next encounter. I am also against punishing front line servicemen without in-depth investigation. Based on currently available evidence, it is clear that whoever ordered DDG-164 (a 7500 tons destroyer) to chase after a highly maneuverable hundred-tons boat made a serious tactical mistake. Following in-depth investigation free from political interference/favours, the commander/commissar who gave such order should be fired (at least demoted and never be allowed to command vessels). Meanwhile, the cost guard vessel turned the wrong way when about to be hit. In general, Hhgh-speed chase should be the jobs of small coast guard vessels, not destroyers and larger CCG cutters.
 

votran

Junior Member
Registered Member
In fact, if those "neutral", "objective" and "professional" media really want to accuse of being unprofessional because of the risks involved (such as those accusations to the close interception of the PLAAF), then the PCG side is the real unprofessional.

It was it that took the initiative to intrude into the path of the 164 with the CCG ship. If the PCG ship failed, the entire ship would have been split in two, with even higher casualties.

But they won’t. Instead, they will lead the audience to brag about PCG’s “professionalism” and “David defeating Goliath”, but it cannot change the fact that PCG is powerless to change the status quo.
if china want that they need to be the Goliath "dark shadow" behind alot of english media network and internaltional social media ...like the way tencent put their "investment" into many western gaming companies

currently you can easily guest who is behind all the world english media

china only have tiktok it not enough and even in case of tiktok they still have no choice but to follow the US/allied narrative alot of time
 

GodRektsNoobs

Senior Member
Registered Member
china alway have a big weakness : too many people

meaning : very easy for political unrest , chaos ,unstable happen + grovernment alway want peaceful development but very bad at propagranda both inside and outside + grovernment + large part of population lack violent expansionist spirit

all of that lead to very heavy censorship to keep thing stick together

a big nation with massive population need violent expansionist spirit because it work like an exhaust port , all the angry issue in life of bilions people need to be release somewhere else

there are no magic exist to make it disappear

can't close the lid all the time forever as a grovernment specially single party rule grovernment like china via heavy censorship .

sooner or later all those "bad gas" inside the closed hole will blow the lid wide open destroy the whole thing

that just how thing alway work since the dawn of humanity , when human still live in cave and kill thing with rock

war or violent expansionist = exhaust port
Dude, have you seen the Philippines? Which country do you think will blow over first:

- The country that's on the forefront of human civilization, a country with the 3rd largest landmass combined with some of the most advanced technology mankind has in possession, combined with by far the largest trade surplus globally ($1.2 trillion in 12 months). A country that accounts for 80% of global shipbuilding.

Or

- An overpopulated agricultural nation with majority of their people in a single urban area on a single island, where a not insignificant portion of the population resort to eating pagpag for sustenance. A country that contributed almost zero technological input to humanity. A country whose navy consists primarily of hand-me-downs, with almost zero shipbuilding capability?

It will be very unfortunate if the Philippines do blow over. However, I'm sure there are itchy trigger fingers in the PLAN that is waiting for that moment.
 
Last edited:

RoastGooseHKer

Junior Member
Registered Member
china alway have a big weakness : too many people

meaning : very easy for political unrest , chaos ,unstable happen + grovernment alway want peaceful development but very bad at propagranda both inside and outside + grovernment + large part of population lack violent expansionist spirit

all of that lead to very heavy censorship to keep thing stick together

a big nation with massive population need violent expansionist spirit because it work like an exhaust port , all the angry issue in life of bilions people need to be release somewhere else

there are no magic exist to make it disappear

can't close the lid all the time forever as a grovernment specially single party rule grovernment like china via heavy censorship .

sooner or later all those "bad gas" inside the closed hole will blow the lid wide open destroy the whole thing

that just how thing alway work since the dawn of humanity , when human still live in cave and kill thing with rock

war or violent expansionist = exhaust port
In that case, the way to deal with liberals and west worshippers taking advantage of temporary setbacks is to mobilise the left-wing mobs against the formers. This was how that femdom b***h from Wuhan University (dear my Lord, don't let her poison the beautiful Baptist University in my city) and those hanjians who opposed the release of the 731 film were dealt with. I am usually against mobilising the Maoist/populist mob due to their harm to the economy and social stability (as demonstrated by the cultural revolution). But when liberals, white worshippers, and fake feminists try to take advantage of China's temporary setbacks and other social issues, the most effective way is to throw these traitors into a crowd of hungry, angry, and h**ny Maoist men. There's no need for more censorship. It is all about feeding the traitors to your hungry but loyal German Shepherds.
 
Last edited:

def333

New Member
Registered Member
1898 Treaty of Paris
- Key Content: Spain ceded the Philippine Islands, Guam, and Puerto Rico to the United States.
- Territorial Scope: The treaty defined Philippine territory as including all islands within the lines of longitude 118° to 127° east and latitude 4° to 20° north.

Huangyan Island 黃岩島; Filipino: Panatag Shoal or Bajo de Masinloc
- Coordinates: 15°07′N, 117°51′E

Spain never actually controlled Huangyan Island (Scarborough Shoal).

Historical records like China's Genglubu navigation charts and Qing Dynasty maps prove Chinese fishermen had been using it for centuries. The Qing government even officially marked it on their maps.
 

萌萌与猫猫

New Member
Registered Member
In that case, the way to deal with liberals and west worshippers taking advantage of temporary setbacks is to mobilise the left-wing mobs against the formers. This was how that femdom b***h from Wuhan University (dear my Lord, don't let her poison the beautiful Baptist University in my city) and those hanjians who opposed the release of the 731 film were dealt with. I am usually against mobilising the Maoist/populist mob due to their harm to the economy and social stability (as demonstrated by the cultural revolution). But when liberals, white worshippers, and fake feminists try to take advantage of China's temporary setbacks and other social issues, the most effective way is to throw these traitors into a crowd of hungry, angry, and h**ny Maoist men. There's no need for more censorship. It is all about feeding the traitors to your hungry but loyal German Shepherds.
Unfortunately, this is probably impossible. Not to mention that the government is unlikely to publicly lower itself to incite and pander to populism (the last time they did so, it backfired badly, and traditional Chinese governments are known for being “unpredictable”), current public opinion is more inclined to condemn the government's weakness and military operational mistakes rather than targeting traitors and collaborators (as mocked in the ship collision incident). The impact of this incident has been so severe that even the most patriotic individuals feel disheartened and lack the confidence to engage in debates with pro-Western collaborators. Additionally, from the perspective of Maoist views, I do not believe they would make comments defending the government in this matter.


 
Top