China News Thread

vincent

Grumpy Old Man
Staff member
Moderator - World Affairs
Wang Wenbin's comment about this quoted the exact phrasing of the tweet and was made only days after the tweet itself. Wang Wenbin also didn't ask a general question about the US maybe wanting to do this: he specifically asked what was up with this particular plan. Additionally, Both the Global Times and China Daily articles about this literally cite Garland Nixon's tweet.
Doesn't matter if the original tweet was made in jest. It is useful as a PR move. American government and media made up shits all the time and even took actions based on those false narratives. Doesn't hurt them a bit
 

luminary

Senior Member
Registered Member
An
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
announcement Tuesday stated that only 19.4% of adults in China’s financial hub were still addicted, while smoking in no-tobacco zones across the city dipped to 12.3% — a record low.

“The new trend in the city is no smoking either indoors or outdoors. The idea of building a tobacco-free environment together is now rooted in people’s minds,” stated the WeChat announcement.

To help implement its strict regulations, citizens found smoking in public in Shanghai are fined 200 yuan ($29), while establishments that allow smoking indoors are fined up to 20,000 yuan.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

China is the world’s largest tobacco consumer, where about 287 million adults smoked cigarettes in 2019 — that’s over four times higher than in Indonesia, the second largest consumer, according to
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
.

Tobacco use has caused over one million deaths annually in the country, according to a joint
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
published by China’s National Health Commission and the World Health Organization.

Among increasingly stringent regulations, Shanghai has led China’s anti-tobacco campaign since 2010 after introducing the first provincial-level tobacco control policy that banned citizens from smoking indoors and while on board public transport.

The regulation was amended twice in the following years to include e-cigarettes in 2022.
 

A potato

Junior Member
Registered Member
Nobody will be surprised by this, but there are a ton of unacceptable double standards at play here. If China were returning the favor by arming Cuba to the teeth (US arming Taiwan), funding domestic far-right pro-white terrorism and Hawaiian separatism (US funding Tibetan rebellion in the 40s/50s and Uighur terrorism in the 2000s and 2010s), then we'd be seeing equal standards and expectations.
They were possibly funding the ETIM back when it was founded.
 

horse

Colonel
Registered Member
Two weeks old now, but a bit of an embarrassing episode by the Foreign Ministry. A satirical tweet by Political Commentator Garland Nixon was apparently taken as literal: he talked about the "plan for the destruction of Taiwan". This was clearly satirical, as he has many tweets in the exact same format. He even made a video stating that it was satire: . Again, the Chinese Foreign Ministry seemingly took it literally, as both Wang Wenbin and Qin Gang mentioned this "plan":
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
. Global Times also ran with the story:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
.

Mistakes happen, but this was quite embarrassing tbh. I understand that it's probably not far removed from actual American contingency plans to blow up TSMC or w/e, but it's still stupid to (a) not detect the sarcasm, and (b) parrot what some untrustworthy radio host is saying in the first place. China's MFA, and China's English-facing news/diplomacy apparatus has a lot of room for improvement, to put it nicely.

They all look and sound alike.

If they parrot the same propaganda, does not matter if they claim to be sarcastic not.
 

siegecrossbow

General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Two weeks old now, but a bit of an embarrassing episode by the Foreign Ministry. A satirical tweet by Political Commentator Garland Nixon was apparently taken as literal: he talked about the "plan for the destruction of Taiwan". This was clearly satirical, as he has many tweets in the exact same format. He even made a video stating that it was satire: . Again, the Chinese Foreign Ministry seemingly took it literally, as both Wang Wenbin and Qin Gang mentioned this "plan":
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
. Global Times also ran with the story:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
.

Mistakes happen, but this was quite embarrassing tbh. I understand that it's probably not far removed from actual American contingency plans to blow up TSMC or w/e, but it's still stupid to (a) not detect the sarcasm, and (b) parrot what some untrustworthy radio host is saying in the first place. China's MFA, and China's English-facing news/diplomacy apparatus has a lot of room for improvement, to put it nicely.

If it is okay for the U.S. to make inquiries on the Uighur situation based on Adrian Zenz's satirical academic studies then it is perfectly fair for China to ask about the destruction of Taiwan plan based on a satirical tweet.
 

luminary

Senior Member
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
The Ministry of Natural Resources on February 14 published a new version of its world map – directing a return to using the Chinese names of eight cities and areas occupied by the Russian Empire in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. While reverting to the use of the old Chinese names of the eight places, there is no change for the English names.
十四、以下地名应当加括注表示,汉语拼音版地图和外文版地图除外:
(一)“符拉迪沃斯托克”括注“海参崴”;
(二)“乌苏里斯克”括注“双城子”;
(三)“哈巴罗夫斯克”括注“伯力”;
(四)“布拉戈维申斯克”括注“海兰泡”;
(五)“萨哈林岛”括注“库页岛”;
(六)“涅尔琴斯克”括注“尼布楚”;
(七)“尼古拉耶夫斯克”括注“庙街”;
(八)“斯塔诺夫山脉”括注“外兴安岭”。
 
Last edited:
Top