Unless Ericsson and Nokia find different ways to achieve that without infringing on Huawei's patents.
China need a new geopolitical Doctrine ?
- Thread starter MrCrazyBoyRavi
- Start date
- Status
Unless Ericsson and Nokia find different ways to achieve that without infringing on Huawei's patents.
It is absolutely not surprising. I expect all Western and EU countries to act this way against Huawei. I have been saying for years that China must assiduously ensure that it has the domestic capability of producing any particular good that is worth producing and must focus heavily on its domestic market.
Led by the United States, the West will not welcome the operations of a major tech company from a country that is not aligned to it, and they will try to disrupt operations of such a company in all markets, including domestic markets if possible, by utilizing all methodologies available to it, short of going to war.
There is urgently a need for a break through in manufacturing a EUV machine comparable to what ASML possesses and other semiconductor and chip manufacturing equipment, that will demonstrate to the US, the West, and countries aligned with them, that a tech embargo on China is ineffective, and it will create an entire high tech supply chain thoroughly independent from cut off by the US. When this happens, one will see the breaking of ranks among the US Alliance to sell their state of the art goods to China, which it will be wise for China to accommodate to a significant extent. Countries outside the US Alliance system will also be free of threats of sanctions against them by the US for using products that the US does not want them to use.
manqiangrexue
Brigadier
I do think it would be hilarious if Africa ended up with better telecoms than Europe after this LOLOL
I looked into your post a bit further. One of the pieces of evidence you cite is the leaked population projections calling for a w/3 reduction in America's population.
You think this is how much the USA is willing to lose in a nuclear war.
I don't buy that for a second, given America's current social dysfunction. A nuclear war would destroy the nation for good, since there is no common culture or race that binds us together. So put that worry out of your mind.
With that said, the source of that Stat is something called Deagel.com
I thin this is something China should be making more of. Fake news websites that subvert and occupy the target population with nonsensical conspiracy theories. It's an elementary psyop, but it seems that China spends little on influencing Western society effectively. Meanwhile the West spreads nonsense about the 3 Gorges Dam. It's the inability to impose costs on America for having utterly detached from reality opinions on China that I consider China's core PR failure.
As long as Huawei and other Chinese companies remain reliant on high end chips and manufacturing equipment from countries that are part of the US Alliance system and indeed any foreign country with the exception presently of Russia, they are highly vulnerable. It does not matter what patent portfolio that they may own.
Just like Steve Bannon told Trump that killing Huawei was 10X more important than signing any Trade Deal...
likewise
Chinese Tech independence (esp from that of US/West) is 10X more important than short term profits (5G contracts) to China's long term strategic future
lol US was definitely making threats about China buying American agriculture, so typical of the western colonial mindset
escobar
Brigadier
We have already debate on that but you prefer empty and rhetoric talk. It is not even about Huawei.
But in a the HW case, why should you set as a goal to make a country use it when you don't really have the power to do that and the whole country Gov don't want it? It will end with threat and theatrical.
I do not understand why there continue to be Chinese experts within the industry who are so conciliatory and speak so hopefully about global integration when it is clear that there are those who are trying to press a knife at one's throat and kind words will not stop them. I take it that Process Wei Shaojun is indeed an expert in the technical side of the industry, but he comes across as extremity naive about geopolitics and the clear intention of the United States to stifle and probably even destroy China semiconductor and other high tech industries. Having the capability of producing worth having high tech goods equal to or surpassing that which presently exist or will exist is absolutely imperative for China not to be blackmailed by any single or alliance of different countries as it is being done to it now. I really do not see how replicating an EUV Machine very similarly capable to what ASML possesses necessitates that one works with others to achieve it, even though that would be nice.
- Status