China leeps forward in nuclear reactor technology

Schumacher

Senior Member
Interesting thread. Here's a report today that a Chinese firm will begin construction of a commercial 'pebble bed' plant this yr.
And the 2nd report is of China's recent step in fusion tech.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Huaneng aims for nuclear plant `first'

A mainland group led by Huaneng Power International plans to start construction this year of the world's first commercial nuclear power plant using so-called "pebble bed" technology to help meet soaring energy demand.

Wednesday, February 22, 2006

A mainland group led by Huaneng Power International plans to start construction this year of the world's first commercial nuclear power plant using so-called "pebble bed" technology to help meet soaring energy demand.

The 200-megawatt reactor in Shandong, 50 percent owned by Huaneng, will cost US$375 million (HK$2.93 billion), said Wu Zongxin, a professor at the Institute of Nuclear and New Energy Technology at Tsinghua University, which developed the prototype and will own 5 percent of the project.

China last year began a US$48 billion plan to expand nuclear power capacity almost sixfold by 2020 to curb a soaring oil import bill and pollution from coal-fired stations.

Mainland scientists claim the new plant may be safer and cheaper than conventional plants.

"We're open to using local and foreign technologies in the development process," Wu said Friday.

China plans to raise nuclear capacity to 40,000 megawatts by 2020 from 6,700 megawatts, China National Nuclear, the nation's largest nuclear plant builder, said in June.

France's Areva, British Nuclear Fuels' Westinghouse Electric and Russia's AtomStroyExport are bidding for US$8 billion worth of contracts to build four reactors in China.

The equipment will be used in the Sanmen Nuclear Power Stations in Zhejiang, southwest of Shanghai, and the Yangjiang Nuclear Power Station in Guangdong.

China National Nuclear said Tuesday it has delayed selecting the winner of the contracts because it is seeking to cut project costs. A decision on the bids was expected at the end of last year.

China, which has to date favored the so-called pressurized water reactor technology developed by Westinghouse, designer of 61 percent of the world's nuclear reactors, is in a race with a rival project in South Africa to develop pebble bed technology.

South Africa's Pebble Bed Modular Reactor project is led by state-controlled utility Eskom Holdings and 15 percent owned by Westinghouse, Eskom spokesman Tom Ferreira said Friday.

The project is due to build a demonstration plant this year for commercial operation in 2010, according to the World Nuclear Association's Web site.

Pebble bed technology, invented in Germany, uses kernels of uranium oxycarbide surrounded by carbon and silicon carbide, either in hexagonal shapes or billiard ball-sized pebbles.

Eskom claims greater safety for the technology because helium, which is used to transfer heat from the core to the power-generating turbines, is chemically inert, cannot combine with other chemicals and is non-combustible.

Since air cannot enter the primary circuit, oxygen cannot get into the high temperature core to corrode the graphite used in the reactor, Eskom said.

Thus chemical reactions and oxidation, "two of the great dangers in conventional reactors," are sidelined, Eskom said.

Pressurized water or boiling water reactors, the most common types currently in operation, use water or steam to transfer heat from the core to the power-generating turbines.

Tsinghua University started operating a 10-megawatt test model of a pebble bed plant in Beijing in 2003 and the unit is operating smoothly, according to Wu.

The first commercial version, 35 percent owned by China Nuclear Engineering & Construction Group, may be completed by 2012, he said.

BLOOMBERG



Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


China's 'man-made sun' experiment reaches final stages

By Terry Wang

Shanghai. February 10. INTERFAX-CHINA - An experimental nuclear fusion device dubbed EAST (Experimental Advanced Superconducting Tokamak) is now in the last phase of installation, and will be finished in the middle of March, officials connected to the project told Interfax.

The EAST project, described as a "man-made sun" by state news agency Xinhua, cost RMB 300 mln (USD 37.5 mln) to build. "It is a key project of China's 1996-2000 five-year plan, and RMB 165 mln [USD 20.63 mln] was funded by the state government," said Chen Yan, the PR director of the Hefei Institute of Plasma Physics, a unit of the China Academy of Sciences.

EAST produces nuclear fusion through the use of deuterium and tritium. The process is similar to the reactions that take place in the sun, but it is controllable.

Chen Yan told Interfax that the device would be put into the discharge and cooling stage in July or August, the results of which would finally decide whether the experiment was successful. If the EAST is deemed to have worked after a final series of tests, it will be the first nuclear fusion device of its kind.

It is an upgrade of China's first superconducting Tokamak device, dubbed HT-7, which was also built by the plasma physics institute in partnership with Russia in the early 1990s.

"The EAST project research will contribute valuable knowledge and experience to the ITER, another nuclear fusion program still in its initial stages, which involves Russia, Japan, the United States, the European Union, China and South Korea," Chen noted.

The chief Chinese scientist with the ITER program has said in an interview with Xinhua that China is aiming for the independent development of the reactor technology.

Chen said that it was impossible for any country to get detailed nuclear technology from others, and all the projects currently underway were just for the purposes of basic research, essential for the final application of the technology.

However, Chen said it would take a long time to apply the technology commercially. "It will be difficult to put the technology into large-scale operation within the next 50 years."

Asked whether the technology could eventually account for a large proportion of energy use, Chen said it was hard to forecast.

"The real application is something quite far away in the future. It is difficult to judge the profitability of the technology in terms of commercial application," Chen said. "However, it can support the energy supply for the whole world, in theory, for tens of billions of years."
 

sumdud

Senior Member
VIP Professional
Wait. But why can't they use the radioactivity of wastes for power? It's still radioactive.......
Incorrect types of radiation??? :confused:

And unbreakable?......
The point is to reduce pollution, and 1 time use items like these aren't going to help..... Even though they are safe....
 

vincelee

Junior Member
sure they're radioactive, but they're depleted. How do you propose to harness gamma radiation? To be honest, nuclear waste disposal isn't even that big of a deal, just bury it. This has been proven.
 

swimmerXC

Unregistered
VIP Professional
Registered Member
Plutonium and uranium are reusable materials..
Recycling Fissile Materials
Plutonium and uranium are reusable materials. The recycling strategy allows these to be recovered with a high degree of efficiency (99.88% of the fissile materials contained in spent fuel are recovered in modern reprocessing plants). In-depth studies have shown that efficient plutonium extraction lessens the radiotoxicity of the final waste by a factor of 20 to 30, thus easing its underground disposal.

Plutonium and uranium are then available for reuse in nuclear fuel, through fabrication of new fuel for power reactors. Plutonium recycling in MOX fuel is a routine activity in Europe. Japan has decided to initiate its own plutonium-based fuel loading programme, while other Asian countries contemplate its use as a part of their back-end strategies. To date, 29 reactors are loaded with MOX fuel in Europe (15 in France, nine in Germany, three in Switzerland and two in Belgium), and this figure should increase in the years to come as the French government recently gave the go-ahead to the further use of MOX fuel in 900 MWe-type reactors.

Using plutonium in nuclear reactors is an advantage in terms of energy output (1 gram of plutonium produces the same amount of electricity as the combustion of 1 to 2 tonnes of oil), of raw materials conservation (plutonium recycling means that less uranium will be consumed), and of non-proliferation (both reprocessing/recycling facilities and nuclear power plants are under the control of stringent international and national physical protection and safeguards programmes).

In addition, the utilisation of MOX fuel leads to a reduction of plutonium stockpiles. Whereas a reactor using enriched uranium produces 250 kg of plutonium per year, a 30% MOX fuel loaded reactor produces none, and a 100% MOX reactor (with a full MOX fuel core), burns approximately 60 kg of Pu per TWh generated. Thus, stabilising plutonium production is only the beginning. In the future, with the development of 50% or 100% MOX fuelled reactors, the fuel cycle system could offer the decisive advantage of burning more plutonium than it produces.

Conversely, leaving the plutonium intact in spent fuel will undoubtedly lead to the creation of so-called "plutonium mines", meaning that for hundreds of years a dangerous material could be exposed to the biosphere, either by accident or through a voluntary intrusion. One should not forget that nuclear energy involves dealing with some of the longest-active materials which can be found. This requires extra precautions, as the future of our societies cannot be predicted. We must therefore take all preventive measures, ensuring that the nuclear materials disposed of underground are the least hazardous to future generations. It is a moral responsibility for those who currently take advantage of nuclear energy.

As far as uranium is concerned, its recycling has advantages because reprocessed uranium (representing about 96% of recycled material) can be used in all major types of nuclear power reactor currently in operation. To date, several reactors have been loaded with fuel made out of re-enriched reprocessed uranium in France, Belgium, Japan and Germany. The present low levels of natural uranium prices do not render the recycling of reprocessed uranium route a cost-effective one. Nevertheless, this recycling pathway should not be evaluated solely on the basis of minimising short term fuel cost. A reasoned decision needs to be made within a long term framework, taking into account strategic and environmental considerations in conserving natural uranium resources and reducing ultimate waste quantities.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

vincelee

Junior Member
Assuming MOX is allowed.

Here is the thing. Not all radioactive material are considered nuclear fuel. Especially when you go down to the waste products. Also, most nuclear fuel today are of the low output type, meaning they don't radiate that much compared to, say, your normal depleted uranium. However, due to public hysteria, they still must be treated in very....redundant manners.
 

sumdud

Senior Member
VIP Professional
What is MOX anyway?

99.88% efficiency? That's good for China, given that they actually utilise this information to reduce their production of waste..... But how do you get 250kg of Uranium anyway? From the fuel rod material? Moderator? Coolant?

But is it possible to turn waste back into fuel in the reactor?
 

swimmerXC

Unregistered
VIP Professional
Registered Member
MOX=Mixed Oxide Fuel
basically you burn the left over plutonium in a spent fuel rod, but first u gotta seperate it from the uranium, then mix plutonium with depleted uranium which makes it into an oxide and can be burned
 

tphuang

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
VIP Professional
Registered Member
good news, I guess.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

This could very well allow Westinghouse to take this deal, since Areva has been unwilling to offer ToT
Westinghouse pledges tech transfer
By Wan Zhihong (China Daily)
Updated: 2006-11-18 09:05

Global nuclear giant Westinghouse said it is offering an all-round technology
transfer in its bid for China's third-generation nuclear power generation units.

"We will fully co-operate with our customers to transfer all technology as
requested," said Stephen R. Tritch, president and chief executive officer (CEO)
of Westinghouse Electric Company.

The company is using its pressurized water reactor AP1000, which has been
approved by the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, to tap into the Chinese
market.

Although the company's bid for China's third-generation nuclear power reactors
was delayed partly because it was bought by Toshiba, said Tritch, he expressed
confidence in his company's advanced technology and competitive price.

Toshiba, Japan's largest maker of nuclear power plant equipment, bought
Westinghouse for US$5.4 billion to bolster its position in the nuclear power
industry.

"But Westinghouse will continue to be a US-operated company with the technology
in the control of the US Government," said the CEO, a member of the trade
delegation to China led by US Secretary of Commerce Carlos Gutierrez.

If Westinghouse wins the contract, the project will be a first in the Chinese
nuclear power sector for the company, which designs half of the world's nuclear
reactors.

It is currently competing with French nuclear group Areva for the contracts for
four third-generation nuclear reactors two in Sanmen, East China's Zhejiang
Province, and another two in Yangjiang, South China's Guangdong Province.
 
Top