lcloo
Captain
While discussing constructively on Chinese Flankers, I hope people here would avoid the negative controvecy of SAC and CAC tribalism fiercely fought in domestic forums in China.
We have to understand that the manufacturers normally make changes on their existing aircraft to the specific demands from PLAAF and/or PLANAF. They do not make significant changes like modificatiion on aircraft structure, to attract more customers orders, especially for the Chinese Flankers there are only 2 end users since export is not permitted.
Thus it is basically PLAAF/PLANAF (the end users) rather than SAC (the seller) that decides what to change, and demanded on when the finished product should come out.
And also, why spend more money and time to significantly modify a Flankers when more resources should go to 5th and development of 6th gen aircraft?
We have to understand that the manufacturers normally make changes on their existing aircraft to the specific demands from PLAAF and/or PLANAF. They do not make significant changes like modificatiion on aircraft structure, to attract more customers orders, especially for the Chinese Flankers there are only 2 end users since export is not permitted.
Thus it is basically PLAAF/PLANAF (the end users) rather than SAC (the seller) that decides what to change, and demanded on when the finished product should come out.
And also, why spend more money and time to significantly modify a Flankers when more resources should go to 5th and development of 6th gen aircraft?
Last edited: