chinawhite
Banned Idiot
@ EternalVigil
**-Actually the J-10 is at parity or better than the F-16. The 16 is just a widly used fighter and people still think its good because of that. -**
that is a very vague way of looking at it.
The J-10 from my opinion is a better plane than the F-16 aerodynamically but in electrics the J-10 is up to block 40-50. The F-16 has recieved many up-grades from its earlier design.
The J-10 is a un-tested plane but is very promising. 100 J-10s are btter than that other junk china has.(J-7, J-8 and a smaller extent J-6)
**-It is a good mud mover for ground attack missions for being single engine but it dies everytime to F-15's and has zero chance vs an F22 or eurofighter.-**
What block are you talking about?
The block 60-70 F-16 has better radar than the F-15A/B/C.
Its radar is a lot more superior than the EF radar. Its radar is a AESA while the eurofighter is using a pulse doppler multimode radar. which doesn't even come close to the performance of a AESA
Regards,
Chinawhite
**-Actually the J-10 is at parity or better than the F-16. The 16 is just a widly used fighter and people still think its good because of that. -**
that is a very vague way of looking at it.
The J-10 from my opinion is a better plane than the F-16 aerodynamically but in electrics the J-10 is up to block 40-50. The F-16 has recieved many up-grades from its earlier design.
The J-10 is a un-tested plane but is very promising. 100 J-10s are btter than that other junk china has.(J-7, J-8 and a smaller extent J-6)
**-It is a good mud mover for ground attack missions for being single engine but it dies everytime to F-15's and has zero chance vs an F22 or eurofighter.-**
What block are you talking about?
The block 60-70 F-16 has better radar than the F-15A/B/C.
Its radar is a lot more superior than the EF radar. Its radar is a AESA while the eurofighter is using a pulse doppler multimode radar. which doesn't even come close to the performance of a AESA
Regards,
Chinawhite