Beware the Media...

RedMetalSeadramon

Junior Member
Registered Member
I dont understand why SCMP is allowed to continue to operate when it's quite clear that its been controlled by NATO agents by this point. Look at this video they have on Myanmar. The only interviews they have is with western backed Christian insurgents, when it's the Maoists that's done most of the work. They straight up spent a fifth of the video interviewing some
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

When will national security do something about SCMP?
 

doggydogdo

Junior Member
Registered Member
Its note about trusting or not trusting. Its about being an active, critical consumer. Understand the point of view and goals of the news source and then look for other sources that confirm or contradict and make your own judgement.

As for source bias, this graphic is pretty reliable:
MW-FC101_news_20161215131112_NS.jpg
The graphic suck, they should all be in the sensational or clickbait section because that's how they attract readers. And all of them are just state department propaganda.

New york times meets "high standards" with articles like this:1719198181746.png
 

coolgod

Colonel
Registered Member
I dont understand why SCMP is allowed to continue to operate when it's quite clear that its been controlled by NATO agents by this point. Look at this video they have on Myanmar. The only interviews they have is with western backed Christian insurgents, when it's the Maoists that's done most of the work. They straight up spent a fifth of the video interviewing some
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

When will national security do something about SCMP?
I don't think there is much CPC can do about SCMP except for making HK shutdown SCMP. The cost to HK's reputation would be a bit big.

Alibaba group owns them, makes you wonder what kind of people run Alibaba.

 

_killuminati_

Senior Member
Registered Member
I find all the sources in the "best" circle to be terrible.
The only media I've seen that would qualify for that 'best' category is (the old) Vice News before it went bankrupt and subsequently acquired by Soros and other vested interest groups.
 

broadsword

Brigadier
Western media outlets put up obstacles to posts that don't align with their narratives. News.com, SMH.com and the DailyMail are examples I have encountered. Imgur, an image-hosting site, looks innocuous but is actually the home ground of Pax America. It does not tolerate pro-Russia, pro-China and anti-US posts even if only implicit. I find Tiktok refreshing and it's our own.
 
Top