Banned & Warned Members List
- Thread starter Webmaster
- Start date
Warned member: Nobo
Reason: use of stereotyped and personal remarks. You've had warnings for other things before, next time it will be one year.
Sentence: one month ban
Warned member: Tay
Reason: using swear words, making personal attacks, and overall questionable immediate hostility as a new member. Cool down a little before coming back.
Sentence: one week ban
If he still wishes to be permanently banned from the forum then that is fine and will be respected, but it is odd for someone who was self described as having decades old interest in the Chinese military, motivated and having a bookmark to this forum suggesting he should be familiar with it.
Reason: use of stereotyped and personal remarks. You've had warnings for other things before, next time it will be one year.
Sentence: one month ban
Warned member: Tay
Reason: using swear words, making personal attacks, and overall questionable immediate hostility as a new member. Cool down a little before coming back.
Sentence: one week ban
If he still wishes to be permanently banned from the forum then that is fine and will be respected, but it is odd for someone who was self described as having decades old interest in the Chinese military, motivated and having a bookmark to this forum suggesting he should be familiar with it.
Last edited:
Warned member: theforgotten0007
Reason: contesting and challenging moderator instructions despite multiple warnings, directly responding and quoting moderator red text posts.
Sentence: 1 week warning ban for now, because I have a feeling this time you were just caught up in the moment.
To clarify: yes, the rules of the forum empowers moderators to have the ability to shut down a particular discussion/topic if they deem it as having substantial off topic potential.
If you had just accepted that instruction, none of this would have eventuated and I would have kept that original post and chart there.
Reason: contesting and challenging moderator instructions despite multiple warnings, directly responding and quoting moderator red text posts.
Sentence: 1 week warning ban for now, because I have a feeling this time you were just caught up in the moment.
To clarify: yes, the rules of the forum empowers moderators to have the ability to shut down a particular discussion/topic if they deem it as having substantial off topic potential.
If you had just accepted that instruction, none of this would have eventuated and I would have kept that original post and chart there.
Warned member: ZeEa5KPul
Reason: mockery/expression of mirth towards civilian victims of a violent terrorist attack. That is beyond what is acceptable here.
Sentence: 1 week ban -- with immediate permanent ban on next offense.
Now, a week might seem light, but let me be clear -- the next time that anything remotely controversial is posted by you, there will be an immediate permanent ban. No discussion, no protests. You've had enough warnings before and even banned before with subsequent retractions. I thought with that many warnings you would recognize that being on your best, PG rated behaviour and keeping a perfectly clean nose would be your number one priority, but perhaps this will make it more obvious.
To everyone at large, this forum is not reddit, it isn't a playground for people to crack abhorrent jokes about violence. Just because other forums and message boards are more virulent, toxic and racist doesn't mean this forum shouldn't set its own standards for itself.
Take some pride in what you're writing here.
Reason: mockery/expression of mirth towards civilian victims of a violent terrorist attack. That is beyond what is acceptable here.
Sentence: 1 week ban -- with immediate permanent ban on next offense.
Now, a week might seem light, but let me be clear -- the next time that anything remotely controversial is posted by you, there will be an immediate permanent ban. No discussion, no protests. You've had enough warnings before and even banned before with subsequent retractions. I thought with that many warnings you would recognize that being on your best, PG rated behaviour and keeping a perfectly clean nose would be your number one priority, but perhaps this will make it more obvious.
To everyone at large, this forum is not reddit, it isn't a playground for people to crack abhorrent jokes about violence. Just because other forums and message boards are more virulent, toxic and racist doesn't mean this forum shouldn't set its own standards for itself.
Take some pride in what you're writing here.
Warned member: Chandragupt
Reason: being unable to have coherent or logical conversations that is unable to be discerned as whether it is incompetence or trolling across a number of different threads
Sentence: 1 month ban. Have a read around more widely, and on return consider formulating information in a more coherent manner.
Reason: being unable to have coherent or logical conversations that is unable to be discerned as whether it is incompetence or trolling across a number of different threads
Sentence: 1 month ban. Have a read around more widely, and on return consider formulating information in a more coherent manner.
No offense but the likelihood of that is lower than getting a baboon to recite Hamlet's soliloquy. Are we so desperate for traffic that we'll let him out of the cage in a month?
It's about giving everyone a fair chance.
We already gave him two if I recall correctly.
If that is the case, feel free to escalate as appropriate.