Bangladesh Thread

Sardaukar20

Captain
Registered Member
The US State Department had expressed it's open support of the change of government in Bangladesh. It sounds to me like they had a hand in it too.

So if India decides to intervene in Bangladesh. I wonder how the Americans are gonna take it.
 

coolgod

Colonel
Registered Member
The US State Department had expressed it's open support of the change of government in Bangladesh. It sounds to me like they had a hand in it too.

So if India decides to intervene in Bangladesh. I wonder how the Americans are gonna take it.
Lmao if India intervenes in Bangladesh, China and US might finally be on the same side of a war :p


Indian subreddits jerking off to fantasies of invading Bangladesh.


Indian fake news blaming China and Pakistan for the event in Bangladesh.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

 
Last edited:

ACuriousPLAFan

Brigadier
Registered Member
Lmao if India intervenes in Bangladesh, China and US might finally be on the same side of a war :p


Indian subreddits jerking off to fantasies of invading Bangladesh.


Indian fake news blaming China and Pakistan for the event in Bangladesh.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


So much for "Endia is the ultimate voice of the Global South saar" when the Jai Hinds are daydreaming of invading and occupying literally every single one of their neighbours all the time.

 
Last edited:

coolgod

Colonel
Registered Member
So much for "Endia is the ultimate voice of the Global South saar" when the Jai Hinds are daydreaming of invading and occupying literally every single one of their neighbours all the time.


Racist loincloths imperialists reveal themselves. I saw many Indians post the reason why India is underdeveloped is cause of its bad neighbours while the reason why China is ahead is cause China has great neighbours.

Some funny pics I found
1722926915534.jpeg
1722926952289.png
 

FairAndUnbiased

Brigadier
Registered Member

Racist loincloths imperialists reveal themselves. I saw many Indians post the reason why India is underdeveloped is cause of its bad neighbours while the reason why China is ahead is cause China has great neighbours.

Some funny pics I found
View attachment 133711
View attachment 133712
If development depends on having great neighbors then India must really be deep in the hole because it seems not even China can carry India.
 

mossen

Junior Member
Registered Member
I've been reading the Bangladesh subreddit a bit. I don't think they are representative of the country, but they clearly both hate Hasina and fear the military trying to turn their country into Pakistan, unwilling to allow true democratisation. Many are also apprehensive about islamists trying to take control in the power vacuum that has emerged.

My sense is that the student protesters are basically of the same view and many want a more peaceful and democratic country. But we've seen revolutions hijacked before. Many liberals and leftists overthrew the Shah of Iran because they wanted democracy and ended up with an Islamic theocracy.

India's mistake is two-fold: first, it supported Hasina for far too long, thereby disqualifying itself in the eyes of the protestors. Second, it views all opposition to Hasina as islamists whereas the reality is much more complicated. It remains to be seen how this shakes out, but I hope the student protestors get their way, because their heart is in the right place.
 

Shams

New Member
Registered Member
I think everyone needs to calm their tits a notch and give credits to where it is due. Geo politics is not dual switch circuit. It is a complex game. As a Bangladeshi, living outside and being on & off the country, I will try to address some of the questions.

First, everyone needs to avoid vague term without proper characteristics.
What do you actually mean by Pro X and Pro Y? What this pro stands for? An ally? A vassal state?

Second, Sheikh Hasina's toppling was done by US CIA's wonderful inter dimensional chess game.
No.
Sheikh Hasina was immensely unpopular and an Indian puppet. Because of barrier of language, The people outside do not understand whole scenario. They search Sheikh Hasina in internet, gather information, and then try to judge what happened on field.
So there are large missing pieces. During not only these protests, other protests that happened before Awami League used their wings as a shield to terrorize people. Search BSL- Bangladesh Satro League, Bangla Jubo League. Their open crimes, murders are something that is only displayed in internal medias. So people outside do not understand the anger towards Hasina is not only because of what she is , what she did alone. It is the whole system she used to keep her in power.

But, it serves US's interest.
No.
The widespread protest was triggered by a brave student named Aby Sayed in Rangpur , who openly asked to be shot. He died of bullet wounds.

But, students are easily influenced.
Yes.
But no one can influence them to die, That is the massive difference between color revolution and people's revolution.

US has been trying to topple Hasina for years. Because they want their ally BNP in power. The plan is two fold. Just half, toppling hasina will not do.
If ,by US has hand in this protest ,you mean US has intensely observed downfall of Hasina, then yes. US had hand. But, US had eye would be more accurate. And using these statements would be a massive insult to those who have sacrificed their lives.

But, Hasina was Pro China too.
No.
I think China has finally realized after teesta river snub and Rail transit to India over Padma bridge( Same bridge China helped built) that there is no equal partnership with her in power. Backing of Hasina government is one point of dislike you will find about China among Bangladeshis.
I do not cite Western source as reference, but this is a good piece that raised some good points
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
One more thing to be added, US wanted to topple Hasina up until 2015-2016. Then India went into lap of US, with Donald Trump visiting there . So US did not need to topple Sheikh Hasina knowing what India's reaction would be.

But US has won.
No.
Bangladesh is more Anti-US than Anti-India. There was widespread protest against comment of US ambassador to Bangladesh that US needs to help Bangladesh. This was during Holy Artisan Bakery terrorist attack. US is deeply hated because of their interventionism, far more so than India. AND to add fuel to the fire, the Israel angle. You try praising Israel in Bangladesh, you will be beaten to death by public. And if you are talking about Matthew Miller's statements, they are falling on deaf years. Nobody wants to hear any sympathizing words from US of all.

US, India is not welcomed in Bangladesh, that is political sentiment. The public sentiment however, is much much worse. For example, i have seen members here are saying Bangladesh was one of few allies India had. That is not remotely true. Because people only saw what government wanted you to see. People are vehemently anti India, often violently. Last time during Modi's visit, it triggered a nation wide unrest in Bangladesh. Public views of China Russia is polar opposite to US - India. Awami League is finished and BNP or any other west-angled puppet will not come to power. Because it will not ne tolerated. That is 100%.

So far the news is, Noble Laurette Dr Md. Yunus is going to be head of interim government.

I will give you another piece of information as people are easily misinformed. Sheikh Hasina has fled. The current honorable Army chief is her cousin sister's husband, who is eldest daughter of General Mustafiz, another former army chief, and Sheikh Hasina's uncle. So i would say to everyone not to make strategic meaning of everything they find on Internet.
 

gelgoog

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
I know a lot of people in Bangladesh did not like the government. I have met such people in the US.

However you can pretty much bet things will get worse after the coup. Bangladesh had been growing its GDP significantly since she went back into power. At the time she came back in India had higher GDP/capita than Bangladesh, and now it is the opposite. Her opponents when they were in power cratered the economy.

If it is like what I think it is, then the same thing will happen to Bangladesh that happened to the Philippines. Investment will stop. And the country will stop growing. If Bangladesh becomes US aligned and splits from the BRICS then all the investment which is being used by them to build much needed infrastructure will dry up. Currently a huge chunk of it is being built with Indian or Chinese companies and capital.

The government tried to have some kind of balance in economic relations with everyone. Investments from both BRICS nations and the West were being done. They could never fully embrace BRICS because most of their exports are clothes manufactures sold to the West. But the West won't provide them with much necessary infrastructure investment.
 
Last edited:

ansy1968

Brigadier
Registered Member
I know a lot of people in Bangladesh did not like the government. I have met such people in the US.

However you can pretty much bet things will get worse after the coup. Bangladesh had been growing its GDP significantly since she went back into power. At the time she came back in India had higher GDP/capita than Bangladesh, and now it is the opposite. Her opponents when they were in power cratered the economy.

If it is like what I think it is, then the same thing will happen to Bangladesh that happened to the Philippines. Investment will stop. And the country will stop growing. If Bangladesh becomes US aligned and splits from the BRICS then all the investment which is being used by them to build much needed infrastructure will dry up. Currently a huge chunk of it is being built with Indian or Chinese companies and capital.

The government tried to have some kind of balance in economic relations with everyone. Investments from both BRICS nations and the West were being done. They could never fully embrace BRICS because most of their exports are clothes manufactures sold to the West. But the West won't provide them with much necessary infrastructure investment.
The problem with us in the global south, we had short memories, within 4 years, she will be back to take power again and rebranded herself cause whoever her successor is, the problem she left behind is so huge that they need outside power to stabilized its economy. I have seen it many times and the Marcos are a perfect example.
 

gelgoog

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
The problem with us in the global south, we had short memories, within 4 years, she will be back to take power again and rebranded herself cause whoever her successor is, the problem she left behind is so huge that they need outside power to stabilized its economy. I have seen it many times and the Marcos are a perfect example.
Hasina is just too old. She won't come back. She already came back once but won't happen again.

Both Hasina and Khaleda would eventually be too old and someone else would rule Bangladesh. But I guess these people cannot wait.
 
Top