Bummer about Seedance 2.0 having to delay its global rollout. I guess as a global company it has to play ball, even if deep down I would've loved to see them giving Hollywood studios the finger. But that's the same as geopolitics, so hopefully they can get the legal stuff worked out and release soon.
Artificial Intelligence thread
- Thread starter 9dashline
- Start date
Many users have already complained about performance degradation in Seedance 2.0 (like all other leading models), either by quantization or routing, they have begun to reduced accuracy due to insufficient computing power.
Launching an overseas version under these circumstances would only exacerbate the problem.
The campaign to ban DeepSeek (and other Chinese AI labs) is gathering momentum.
I wouldn't be surprised if the only way to access DeepSeek will be via VPN a few years from now.
As for the accusations, the major US frontier labs engaged in massive copyright violations when they trained their models. This about pulling up the drawbridge under the guise of "national security".
I wouldn't be surprised if the only way to access DeepSeek will be via VPN a few years from now.
As for the accusations, the major US frontier labs engaged in massive copyright violations when they trained their models. This about pulling up the drawbridge under the guise of "national security".
Theo pointed out how far-fetched Anthropic's claims were.
Anthropic claims that distillation is legitimate, but the open-source model poses a risk of being used to develop biological weapons or conduct malicious cyber activities, therefore Anthropic does not allow the open-source model to use the output data it generates.
However, Anthropic also claims that their security system prevents the generation of data for "developing biological weapons or conducting malicious cyber activities." So how does the open-source model obtain these data and distill it, to increase the risk?
Anthropic claims that distillation is legitimate, but the open-source model poses a risk of being used to develop biological weapons or conduct malicious cyber activities, therefore Anthropic does not allow the open-source model to use the output data it generates.
However, Anthropic also claims that their security system prevents the generation of data for "developing biological weapons or conducting malicious cyber activities." So how does the open-source model obtain these data and distill it, to increase the risk?
Last edited:
These dumbass politicians don't understand that it's an opensource model and anyone can run it as long as they have the RAM/VRAM for it, they can ban it all they want, won't stop people from using something like Openrouter or community hosting it on their own servers.
Also the land of the "Free" lmao. When you no longer have access to a service because some dumbass politicians decided to ban it that's not "Freedom".
Really am so very tired of Anthropic's whole "noooo if anyone develops AGI before us they're going to be the baddies!!! we need to be first!!" shtick
Doubly tiring when you consider that every single one of these companies know full well that language models do not/will not translate into AGI
Doubly tiring when you consider that every single one of these companies know full well that language models do not/will not translate into AGI
Can the V4 beat the Kimi 2.5, GLM-5, and Minimax?
Z.ai Chief Scientist: Yes, trust them.
Z.ai Leader: LMAO, but I like it
Z.ai Chief Scientist: Yes, trust them.
Z.ai Leader: LMAO, but I like it
tang jie is the founder of zhipu