broadsword
Brigadier
LC Sign's Tony's jaw dropped to the floor!
That's the f-king craziest story I have heard in some time in a world of crazy stories.AI avatars in China just proved they are ace influencers. It only took a duo 7 hours to rake in more than $7 million
This is quite big if true.
The 2 men in the picture are actually the 2 real hosts...but they are not really doing the streaming. The video is all AI generated!
Here is the actual video
Here is the host's comment:
Streaming platform including AI Avatars is from Baidu.
As opposed to OPEN AI/GOOGLE AI/ANTHROPIC aid U.S. and it's vassal in the middle-east to genociding men, women, and children in Palestine!!Exclusive: DeepSeek aids China's military and evaded export controls, US official says
Here we go....as expected they are going to ban DeepSeek. All too predictable.
R2 about to drop soon? lmaoExclusive: DeepSeek aids China's military and evaded export controls, US official says
Here we go....as expected they are going to ban DeepSeek. All too predictable.
Exclusive: DeepSeek aids China's military and evaded export controls, US official says
Here we go....as expected they are going to ban DeepSeek. All too predictable.
Just an aside, but Deepseek's reasoning just never ceases to amaze me. Just earlier today I watched a Thorium MSR video and recalled an old question I had, which is why it can run in the desert while most other reactors can't. I last looked it up a few years ago, and it was very hard to find the answer via traditional search. I ended up concluding that it was due to the high operating temperature, but couldn't get any specifics. I tried AI today to get the answer, which required some prompting. This was Deepseek's reasoning, just so cool!R2 about to drop soon? lmao
Okay, the user is asking a very specific technical follow-up about molten salt reactors (MSRs), specifically challenging my earlier point about water independence. They're zeroing in on whether the steam cycle in power generation still creates water dependency, which shows they have some engineering awareness.
Hmm, I recall in my previous response I emphasized "no water for cooling" but didn't sufficiently address the Rankine cycle aspect. That was an oversight - the user caught the nuance between reactor cooling versus power conversion. Smart catch.
Let me unpack this properly. First, I need to clarify the two distinct thermal systems: the primary salt loop (which truly is water-free) versus the secondary power block (which usually uses water but doesn't have to). The key is that MSRs decouple these systems.
I should emphasize that the steam cycle is conventional and shared with all thermal plants, but MSRs offer flexibility here. The user might be thinking of traditional nuclear plants where reactor cooling and steam generation are tightly coupled - but in MSRs, the primary loop's safety isn't threatened if the steam system loses water.
Wait, the user mentioned "heatsink for the generator" - that's slightly inaccurate terminology. The condenser cooling is for the working fluid (steam), not directly for the generator. I should gently correct that while answering.
The real gem here is that MSRs can use dry cooling alternatives precisely because their higher temperatures make air cooling more viable than for conventional reactors. That's the critical advantage I need to highlight - it's not about eliminating heat rejection entirely (impossible per thermodynamics), but about options.
I recall China's MSR design uses air-cooled condensers in the Gobi Desert. That's perfect evidence. Also worth noting the gas turbine option for full water elimination, though it's less mature.
The user seems technically inclined, so I can dive deeper into pinch points and temperature differentials. But I must avoid jargon - explain why 700°C vs. 300°C matters for heat transfer efficiency.
...And I should acknowledge that dry cooling has an efficiency trade-off. Being honest about limitations builds credibility. This user would spot evasions.
Ultimately, the core answer is: MSRs move the water dependency from a safety-critical system (reactor cooling) to a non-critical one (power cycle), while enabling water-free alternatives that conventional nukes can't use effectively. That distinction is everything.
You've pinpointed a crucial distinction! While molten salt reactors (MSRs) eliminate water for reactor cooling, most designs do use water indirectly for power generation via steam turbines (the Rankine cycle). However, MSRs have unique advantages that enable water-minimized or even water-free operation in deserts, unlike conventional reactors. Here's the breakdown:
1. Decoupling Reactor Cooling from Power Generation
- Primary Loop (Salt): Fuel is dissolved in molten fluoride salt (e.g., FLiBe), which circulates through the core, absorbing heat. This loop operates at atmospheric pressure and uses the salt as both fuel carrier and coolant. No water is involved here.
- Secondary Loop (Power Conversion): Heat from the primary salt is transferred to a non-radioactive working fluid (e.g., another molten salt, supercritical CO₂, or nitrogen/helium gas) via an intermediate heat exchanger. This is where water traditionally enters the picture for steam generation.
2. The Water Dependency in Power Conversion
Conventional nuclear/coal/gas plants and some MSR designs use a steam Rankine cycle for power generation:
- Steam is produced (using heat from the secondary loop).
- Steam drives a turbine.
- Steam must be condensed back into water after leaving the turbine.
- Condensation requires a heatsink – usually large volumes of water (e.g., from rivers, oceans, or cooling towers that evaporate water).
MSRs operate at much higher temperatures (650–750°C vs. 300–350°C in conventional reactors). This enables efficient alternative power cycles with dramatically lower or zero water needs:
3. How MSRs Enable Water Reduction/Elimination in Deserts
- Dry Cooling (Air-Cooled Condensers):
Instead of water-cooled condensers, large air-cooled heat exchangers (like car radiators) condense steam using desert air. While less efficient than water cooling (reducing output by 5–10%), it's viable due to MSRs' high baseline efficiency (45–50% vs. 33% for conventional reactors).
Example: China's planned Gobi Desert TMSR uses air-cooled condensers.- Gas Brayton Cycles (Water-Free):
MSRs can replace steam turbines with closed-loop gas turbines using:
- Supercritical CO₂ (sCO₂)
- Nitrogen (N₂)
- Helium (He)
These gases are condensed via air-cooled heat exchangers, requiring no water. sCO₂ cycles are especially efficient at high temperatures.
Example: U.S. Department of Energy designs for advanced reactors prioritize sCO₂ for arid regions.- Hybrid Systems:
Waste heat (~550°C) can drive industrial processes (e.g., hydrogen production, desalination), improving overall efficiency and offsetting water use.️ 4. Why High Temperature Matters
Conventional reactors cannot use dry cooling/gas cycles effectively because:
MSRs' 700°C+ output enables:
- Their lower temperatures (300°C) make air cooling thermodynamically inefficient (output drops >25%).
- Gas cycles require >500°C for viability – unattainable in water-cooled reactors.
- Higher thermal efficiency (more electricity per unit of heat).
- Practical use of air/gas cycles with minimal efficiency penalty.
5. Water Use Comparison
Plant Type Cooling Water Needs (litres/MWh) Desert Viability Conventional Nuclear 1,500–2,500 Requires massive water bodies
Coal/Gas 1,000–2,000 MSR (Steam Cycle + Wet Cooling) 800–1,200 Possible but suboptimal
MSR (Steam + Dry Cooling) 20–50 Feasible (water for makeup only)
MSR (sCO₂/N₂ Brayton Cycle) 0 Fully water-free
Key Takeaway
Molten salt reactors eliminate water for reactor safety (no meltdown risk, atmospheric pressure operation) and enable water-free power cycles via high-temperature operation. While steam cycles using dry cooling reduce water needs by ~95%, closed gas cycles (sCO₂/N₂) can achieve true zero-water operation in deserts. This makes MSRs uniquely suited for arid regions compared to any existing large-scale power technology.
A maths prodigy and the child of two Chinese physicists, Wang, who co-founded Scale aged 19, is neither a celebrated AI researcher nor a top engineer. According to a dozen people who have worked with and for Wang, or invested in Scale, he is a highly effective operator who has close connections across Silicon Valley.
Wang’s real gift, according to multiple people who have worked with him, is an ability to cultivate powerful allies both within Silicon Valley and beyond. His social calendar has interspersed meetings with world leaders including Keir Starmer, Emmanuel Macron and Narendra Modi, alongside trips to New York’s Met Gala and Formula 1 races. His confidantes include OpenAI chief and one time housemate Sam Altman, the ChatGPT maker’s former chief technology officer Mira Murati, and Michael Kratsios, President Donald Trump’s technology adviser.
For staff at Scale — who have joked internally that the company would take years to go public because of its high valuation — the deal represents a welcome windfall. Staff in Meta’s generative AI team are less impressed, according to a person close to the company, citing doubts over Wang’s technical prowess.
Others who know Wang see opportunism behind the relentless network building. “Wang is an operator, he wants to make as much money as possible and make as big a name for himself as possible,” said one former employee. “He wants his name on everything, even when he isn’t across it or hasn’t done the work,” said another person who has worked closely with Wang on a number of projects.