Artificial Intelligence thread

valysre

Junior Member
Registered Member
Guys just admit it, and give it up, AGI will be here within 18 months then ASI will be right around the corner. Debating whether AI can replace a human coder is already a moot point. Coding itself is but a human machine abstraction interface...a middle man tier that itself is not too much longer for this world.
I can't tell if you're being genuine. I guess we can come back to this in a year or two.
 

tphuang

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
VIP Professional
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

I think you can use Test Driven Development. You, and the client and the AI get together and write the tests first, the idea is at the beginning all the test fail, because there is no code, and at the end all the tests pass.

Once the tests have been defined the AI writes the code so that the unit tests pass, once they all do you have a working product.
hmm, you can't do that at all with white box testing.

There are certainly things you can do with AI, but it maybe more limited than people think.

I've just struggled for an entire day changing prompts that I send to GPT to get it to send the data to me that I need. Any half intelligent human being would've understood what I was asking about an hour in. But I just can't get GPT to understand what exactly too look for.

Trying to talk to LLM is not easy.

Guys just admit it, and give it up, AGI will be here within 18 months then ASI will be right around the corner. Debating whether AI can replace a human coder is already a moot point. Coding itself is but a human machine abstraction interface...a middle man tier that itself is not too much longer for this world.
very strange thing to say
 

siegecrossbow

General
Staff member
Super Moderator
hmm, you can't do that at all with white box testing.

There are certainly things you can do with AI, but it maybe more limited than people think.

I've just struggled for an entire day changing prompts that I send to GPT to get it to send the data to me that I need. Any half intelligent human being would've understood what I was asking about an hour in. But I just can't get GPT to understand what exactly too look for.

Trying to talk to LLM is not easy.


very strange thing to say

To be fair he did claim that all Chinese Americans will be locked up by 2024 earlier
 

DuckDuckMoose

New Member
Registered Member
I recall a recent event of a company trying to use AI for coding kernel driver software that led to a widespread outage?? It was as if it "struck the crowd"
 

Engineer

Major
I think a lot people here are mixing up the ideas of automated software development and anthropomorphization of AI. Expecting AI to employ human intuition to solve problems, that's anthropomorphization.

For one, anthropomorphzation is an easy trap to fall into, even in a lot of research, because it is "easy to understand". However, it always ends up to be a massive waste of time. Instead of realizing they are going down the wrong path, people tend to double down on anthropomorphzation when things don't work.

For two, it provides an easy way to shift the goalpost on what can and cannot be done. It is like expecting people to work in an automated manufacturing line
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, then use the fact that people keep dying as evidence to argue against automation. No, automation is not the problem, the people getting in the way are. Instead of wasting time giving yourself a false sense of complacency, it will be more productive to spend that energy to automate away the bean counters and management — make them redundant before they make you redundant.
 

9dashline

Captain
Registered Member
I think a lot people here are mixing up the ideas of automated software development and anthropomorphization of AI. Expecting AI to employ human intuition to solve problems, that's anthropomorphization.

For one, anthropomorphzation is an easy trap to fall into, even in a lot of research, because it is "easy to understand". However, it always ends up to be a massive waste of time. Instead of realizing they are going down the wrong path, people tend to double down on anthropomorphzation when things don't work.

For two, it provides an easy way to shift the goalpost on what can and cannot be done. It is like expecting people to work in an automated manufacturing line
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, then use the fact that people keep dying as evidence to argue against automation. No, automation is not the problem, the people getting in the way are. Instead of wasting time giving yourself a false sense of complacency, it will be more productive to spend that energy to automate away the bean counters and management — make them redundant before they make you redundant.
How exactly you propose the tech side rug pull finance and managerial side first etc?
 
Top