AssassinsMace
Lieutenant General
Re: Chinese Daily Photos, Videos & News of 2012!!!
The problem with animal rights activists is they're a bunch of hypocrites. A pig has the same intelligence as a dog yet one is okay to eat but the other is not. Yes animal rights activists are against all animals being eaten for food but because they know if they called for all animals not to be eaten, they would not get support from the general public. So what do they do instead is exploit people's prejudices and target cultural eating practices to get people on board which makes them racists. Not surprising when they say it's okay to kill and eat an animal because it comes down to it's just ugly. It's like Steve Irwin's father vilifying the Chinese to turn the public against the the sale of kangaroo meat to China. The Chinese don't eat kangaroo meat yet the already long existing kangaroo meat industry of Australia looking to make more money was trying to get the Chinese to have a taste of kangaroo. And Steve Irwin's father chose to blame the Chinese even though Austrailians already have a taste for it. Some Asian countries are ridiculed for eating rats. Yet ironically there are parts of the US that eat squirrels which is a rodent just like a rat. Here's the hypocritical twist. Now all of the sudden it's wrong to eat an ugly looking rat yet there's no problem eating a cute squirrel. If all animals were all equal to humans like "animals lovers" believe, then there would be no criminal distinction. Yet they do have it on what animals are not suitable for eating and who gets to eat it.
And let's not believe horrid conditions for animals for food is something foreign. Animals rights activists have those videos too but they're not used for the same reason of fear of losing general public support. There's a major slaughterhouse in Washington state that carves up cows for packaging meat while they're still alive. Not any different from what has been accused of China.
The problem with animal rights activists is they're a bunch of hypocrites. A pig has the same intelligence as a dog yet one is okay to eat but the other is not. Yes animal rights activists are against all animals being eaten for food but because they know if they called for all animals not to be eaten, they would not get support from the general public. So what do they do instead is exploit people's prejudices and target cultural eating practices to get people on board which makes them racists. Not surprising when they say it's okay to kill and eat an animal because it comes down to it's just ugly. It's like Steve Irwin's father vilifying the Chinese to turn the public against the the sale of kangaroo meat to China. The Chinese don't eat kangaroo meat yet the already long existing kangaroo meat industry of Australia looking to make more money was trying to get the Chinese to have a taste of kangaroo. And Steve Irwin's father chose to blame the Chinese even though Austrailians already have a taste for it. Some Asian countries are ridiculed for eating rats. Yet ironically there are parts of the US that eat squirrels which is a rodent just like a rat. Here's the hypocritical twist. Now all of the sudden it's wrong to eat an ugly looking rat yet there's no problem eating a cute squirrel. If all animals were all equal to humans like "animals lovers" believe, then there would be no criminal distinction. Yet they do have it on what animals are not suitable for eating and who gets to eat it.
And let's not believe horrid conditions for animals for food is something foreign. Animals rights activists have those videos too but they're not used for the same reason of fear of losing general public support. There's a major slaughterhouse in Washington state that carves up cows for packaging meat while they're still alive. Not any different from what has been accused of China.