A fanatic pro-American Italian commentator wrote this article, which I have translated into English. What do you think?
Well, it's not untrue that US has less bureaucratic red tape than EU. Or that it's better at innovation. But EU isn't the one US needs to step up to compete with.
Geographic vastness, self sufficiency and decentralized institutions (in the sense that the administor does not interfere with the specialist) is also defining strengths of China, even more so than they are for US.
building a society or enforcing a contract in the U.S. takes half the time and bureaucracy compared to Europe. As a result, Americans create two or three times as many businesses as in France, Germany, Italy, Japan, or Russia
Yet enforcing a contract or creating a business in China is in turn at least also twice as efficient than in America.
The bottom line is that US won't get China off the top economy throne without breaking the virtuous cycle that is:
-> top tier research institutes -> top tier logistics/industry tech -> fed globally by nearly limitless resources -> top industry experience allows for (back to arrow 1)
To break it, America needs to be better than China at subsidising living standards in the West, the East and the global south.