You are wrong. Why? If weapon bay is only good of stealth, no non-stealth platform would have one. Beside, benefits of weapon bay has been well established since the first bomber was invented. You arguing weapon bay having no aerodynamic benefit is no different than claiming Earth is flat.
F-22 can supercruise, F-15 can't. Where is your lack of internal bay advantage? Where is the bit that you claimed to be sticking out on the F-22? No where. Your theory is debunked.
more weight here it is says you carry internal weapon bays you increase internal volume and increase weight
Yet F-22 supercruise and not F-15. Why? Let me tell you, F-22 has better aerodynamics. That debunks your theory about stealth aircraft having worse performance.
Su-35 and Eurofighter supercruise, read the small letters
We have been through this. Su-35 and Eurofighter have lower supercruise speed than F-22, even though F-22 is the one with internal weapon bay. That debunks your theory about internal weapon bay equating to worse aircraft performance.
It only means the F-22 has a stronger engine then the other two.We have been through this. Su-35 and Eurofighter have lower supercruise speed than F-22, even though F-22 is the one with internal weapon bay. That debunks your theory about internal weapon bay equating to worse aircraft performance.
I found you another source that shows external stores create enormous amount of drag:
It means F-22 has better aerodynamics, because Eurofighter actually has better thrust-to-weight ratio and is considered more powerful. Discussion of raw engine power is meanignless.