asif iqbal
Lieutenant General
53 black hawks for Afghanistan? Good start but not enough
They need 153
They need 153
No, they need a political solution to the main conflicts.The US expressed purpose is now: kill Taliban. So US send equipment that need US boots on the ground, mostly mercenaries rather official armed forces, to prevent neighbouring countries, Pakistan, Iran, Russia, China, assist in reaching a compromise that will allow these countries to help develop the Afghan economy.53 black hawks for Afghanistan? Good start but not enough
They need 153
Now, as more troops depart for Afghanistan, I can’t help but think of what I learned when, after so many years of living and working among Afghan civilians, I finally embedded with American troops in 2010. My first lesson was this: There is no such thing in the American military as a negative after-action report. Military plans are always brilliant; strikes always occur as expected; our soldiers are (it goes without saying) heroic; and goals are naturally accomplished without fail. No wonder the policymakers back in Washington remain convinced that we have the greatest military the world has ever seen and that someday we will indeed succeed in Afghanistan, although we haven’t actually won a war of any significance since 1945.
June 20, 2017
The Honorable Jim Mattis
Secretary of Defense General Joseph L. Votel
Commander, U.S. Central Command General John W. Nicholson, Jr.
Commander, U.S. Forces–Afghanistan and Commander, Resolute Support Major General Richard G. Kaiser
Commander, Combined Security Transition Command–Afghanistan
This report discusses the results of SIGAR’s review of DOD’s procurement of uniforms for the Afghan National Army (ANA). The report determines (1) how and why the U.S. government generated the requirement for the use of a proprietary camouflage pattern for ANA uniforms, and (2) the resulting cost to the U.S. government of using a proprietary camouflage pattern for ANA uniforms from November 2008 through January 2017. Uniforms, consisting of one shirt and one pair of pants, is one example of organizational clothing and individual equipment (OCIE) that DOD has purchased for Afghan National Defense and Security Forces personnel using the Afghanistan Security Forces Fund appropriation. As a general matter, uniforms may use camouflage patterns that are either proprietary or non-proprietary. Proprietary uniforms are made using camouflage patterns that are owned by another entity and may not be used, by DOD or anyone else, without the permission of the owner. Non-proprietary uniforms are made using camouflage patterns that are owned or available for use by DOD without the need for permission from another entity. In 2007, DOD chose to purchase uniforms for the ANA that incorporated a proprietary pattern owned by HyperStealth Biotechnology Corporation (HyperStealth) and was patterned after the U.S. Army’s Combat Uniform which is more costly to produce and has different component specifications than the U.S. Army Battle Dress Uniform. That 2007 decision resulted in the purchase of 1,364,602 such uniforms through January 2017. Our analysis found that DOD’s decision to procure ANA uniforms using a proprietary camouflage pattern was not based on an evaluation of its appropriateness for the Afghan environment. We also found that the procurement costs to the U.S. government were 40–43 percent higher for an ANA uniform using proprietary camouflage and patterned after the U.S. Army’s Combat Uniform than the costs for comparable Afghan National Police (ANP) uniforms that use a non-proprietary pattern and are patterned after the simpler U.S. Army Battle Dress Uniform. DOD has spent approximately $93.81 million to procure uniforms for the ANA using a proprietary pattern since it made the decision approximately 10 years ago. Given our historical and expected future security assistance for the ANA, our analysis found that changing the ANA uniform to a non-proprietary camouflage pattern based on the U.S. Army’s Battle Dress Uniform, similar to those procured for comparable ANP units, could save U.S. taxpayers between $68.61 million and $71.21 million over the next ten years. The current ANA uniform specification still requires the use of a proprietary camouflage pattern. Given the lack of evidence showing that the proprietary pattern is more effective in Afghanistan than lower cost nonproprietary patterns, we suggest that a DOD organization with appropriate expertise in military uniforms conduct a cost-benefit analysis of the current ANA uniform specification to determine whether there is a more effective alternative, considering both operational environment and cost, available.
We provided a draft of this report to DOD for comment on May 02, 2017. DOD provided technical comments on May 30, 2017. We incorporated DOD’s technical comments in the report, as appropriate. In DOD’s technical comments, as well as in subsequent correspondence and a meeting to discuss the draft on June 1, 2017, agency officials expressed general agreement with contents of the draft report. In its written comments, received on June 15, 2017, DOD concurred with our suggested action to conduct a cost-benefit analysis and stated that it “is working with the appropriate DOD Components and the Afghan Ministry of Defense to conduct this assessment.” DOD also stated that it “is following up with the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology and Logistics to ensure that current contracting practices for ANA uniforms as well as Afghan National Police (ANP) uniforms conform to all FAR requirements.” DOD’s comments are reproduced in appendix II. We conducted our work in Kabul, Afghanistan; Army Contracting Command’s office at Rock Island Arsenal, Illinois; The Natick Soldier Research, Development and Engineering Center in Natick, Massachusetts; and Washington, D.C. from April 2016 through April 2017, in accordance with SIGAR’s quality control standards. These standards require that we carry out work with integrity, objectivity, and independence, and provide information that is factually accurate and reliable. For more information on the policies and procedures and quality control standards for conducting special project work, please see SIGAR’s website () SIGAR performed this special project under the authority of Public Law No. 110-181 and the Inspector General Act of 1978, as amended. Should you or your staff have any questions about this project, ......
Sincerely, John F. Sopko Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction
And not just thoseAfghan Air Force to Get More A-29 Super Tucanos...
An Embraer EMB 314 Super Tucano A-29 experimental aircraft flies over White Sands Missile Range on Aug. 1, 2017. Ethan D. Wagner/Air Force
USAF plans to buy seven armed AC-208s for Afghan military
- 28 DECEMBER, 2017
- SOURCE: FLIGHTGLOBAL.COM
- BY: STEPHEN TRIMBLE
- WASHINGTON DC
Orbital ATK would deliver seven armed Cessna AC-208 Caravan aircraft to the Afghan National Army under a pending US Air Force contract award, the US armed service says.
An acquisition notice posted by the Air Force late on 27 December invites comments on a plan to award the contract to Orbital ATK without a competition.
Any responses with alternative options must be submitted to the Aeronautical Systems Center by 12 January. Bids from non-American companies are excluded due to security requirements, the Air Force notice says.
If finalised, the deal would add to the seven AC-208s to 208 more aircraft that the Department of Defense supplied to the Afghan military and police between Fiscal 2007 and 2016, according to a 10 August report by the US Government Accountability Office.
The Afghan Air Force and Special Mission Wing already operate the unarmed version of the C-208 turboprop as a cargo and utility transport.
Orbital ATK advertises the AC-208 Eliminator as a mini-gunship equipped with 70mm (2.75in) guided rockets and Lockheed Martin AGM-114 Hellfire missiles. The aircraft also comes with sensors, target designators, data links and self-protection systems.
The company would deliver the seven aircraft for inspection and approval to the 645th Aeronautical Systems Group, the Air Force notice says. If approved, Orbital ATK must then fly the aircraft to the training site for Afghan C-208 pilots in Fort Worth, Texas.
US Rejects Accusations It Gave Rise to IS in Afghanistan
January 18, 2018 1:04 PM
- Ayaz Gul
FILE - Security forces inspect the site of an Islamic State-claimed attack on a hospital in Kabul, Afghanistan, March 8, 2017.
ISLAMABAD —
The United States reiterated its resolve Thursday to help local forces eliminate Islamic State from Afghanistan and strongly refuted accusations Washington was behind the emergence of the terrorist group in the war-shattered country.
The remarks by the U.S. ambassador to Kabul, John Bass, are the first formal reaction to the repeated accusations in recent months by some Afghans, including former President Hamid Karzai, along with Russia, that U.S. troops are aiding IS militants in Afghanistan.
"Let me take this opportunity, since these rumors continue to circulate, to emphatically state that the United States has not brought Daesh to Afghanistan. The United States has not ever supported Daesh, its creation, its horrible attacks in any form, or fashion," said Bass, while addressing his first news conference in Kabul.
Daesh is the Arabic acronym for IS.
In a series of interviews to media groups, including VOA, late last year, Karzai called IS a "tool" of the U.S. The former Afghan president repeated his allegations Thursday in India, saying it was up to the United States to explain the rise of Daesh and extremism in his country.
"Some of Afghanistan's problems are foreign. Extremism is the product of U.S.-Pakistan cooperation, and Afghanistan has to face implications. The U.S. must explain," Karzai said in New Delhi while taking part in a geopolitical conference known as the Raisina Dialogue.
U.S. Ambassador Bass said there was "absolutely no way" to work out peace or reconciliation with Daesh in Afghanistan.
"The only way to deal with Daesh is through sustained determined efforts on the battlefield to either kill them or capture them and to remove them to prevent them from being able to conduct attacks," said Bass.
The U.S. ambassador said that was the approach the U.S. and other coalition members undertook in Iraq and Syria in partnership with the Iraqi government and with Syrian groups that were committed to defending their part of Syria.
IS operates in Afghanistan under the name Khorasan Province. The terrorist group launched its operations in early 2015 from eastern volatile Afghan regions, mainly Nangarhar province bordering Pakistan.
Since then, the group has extended its activities to other parts of the country, including northern Afghan provinces bordering central Asian states, which is raising alarms in Russia.
IS has claimed responsibility for some of the recent deadly suicide bombings in Afghanistan, particularly in the capital, Kabul.
The violence has left scores of Afghans dead, mostly members of the minority Shi'ite community. U.S. military commanders say former members of the Pakistani Taliban comprise a majority of IS fighters in Afghanistan.
Pakistan alleges IS bases in Afghan border also are behind terrorist attacks against the country. Afghan officials deny the allegations and say IS militants receive support from Pakistan.
Report: China Building Military Base on Afghan-Tajik Border
Jan 7, 2018
A Chinese truck stop in Murghab, near Tajikistan's border with Afghanistan and China. China is reportedly building a new military base in Afghanistan, in which case this road could see more Chinese military traffic. (photo: The Bug Pit)
China is building a military base for the Afghan armed forces in the province of Badakhshan, a senior Afghan military official has said. The plan, if it is realized, promises a deeper Chinese military involvement in Tajikistan, which is necessary as a supply corridor to Badakhshan.
The plans for the new base were worked out during a visit last month by an Afghan defense , the official, General Dawlat Waziri, the news site Fergana News.
At that meeting, the two sides their intention to “deepen pragmatic cooperation in various fields including anti-terrorism operations, and push forward the state and military relations between the two countries.”
China will supply everything the base needs, Waziri said, including "weapons, uniforms for soldiers, military equiment and everything else needed for its [the base's] functioning," Fergana reported.
This is the latest move in Beijing's steadily increasing involvement in security issues on its western border.
"China worries that Chinese Uighurs among the terrorists' ranks can cross into Chinese territory through Afghanistan and become a headache for the Chinese authorities," one Afghan security official told Fergana on condition of anonymity.
For Central Asia, this has important implications because Tajijkistan appears to be an integral part of Chinese-Afghan military cooperation. Badakhshan shares a short () border with China, but in a region impassable by vehicles.
Badakhshan is most easily reached from China via Tajikistan's Pamir region, and some media have that Chinese military vehicles were using Tajikistan territory to transit to Badakhshan for military patrols. (A western diplomat in Central Asia has told The Bug Pit that those reports were credible.)
China, Afghanistan, Tajikistan, and Pakistan (which also borders Badakhstan) are all members of a new Beijing-led security grouping, the Quadrilateral Cooperation and Coordination Mechanism, , to Russia's . Also in 2016, China and Tajikistan held their in the part of Tajikistan bordering on Badakhshan.
A Chinese official, speaking on condition of anonymity, Kabul-based analyst Franz J. Marty a year ago that the Chinese patrols inside Afghanistan had ended in late 2016.
It's not clear whether those patrols were ever restarted, but this base, if realized, would seem to portend much heavier traffic in the future.
The Fergana report said, citing an unnamed source in the Afghanistan Defense Ministry, that work has already begun on the base's planning. A special commission has been created to work out the base's location and other technical details, and a delegation of Chinese military experts were going to be visiting Afghanistan in the coming days to work on that, Fergana reported