Aeroplane procurement rates

tphuang

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
VIP Professional
Registered Member
Really? Where do they get that many engines?
whether they can get the suppliers to deliver that many sets of parts is a different story, but in terms of just assembly wise, the current production level is no where near what could be produced.
 

crobato

Colonel
VIP Professional
The latest from Mr. Fisher, which includes estimates for J-10 now (100 plus) and other stuff like JH-7/A (100 plus too).

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


He got five regiments of J-8F/H and 120 in number, same around as I said in the AFM and CDF forums.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

dollarman

New Member
The latest from Mr. Fisher, which includes estimates for J-10 now (100 plus) and other stuff like JH-7/A (100 plus too).

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


He got five regiments of J-8F/H and 120 in number, same around as I said in the AFM and CDF forums.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

I don't like strategycenter at all, it exagerates like no other. Sometime in 2005, one of their articles claimed the PLAN already had 3 Type 93 SSBNs, which is BS.

I am willing to believe that there are more than 100 J-10, because I read reports that production had hit 100 early last year. Nevertheless, the paper does not take into account several developments, including the cancellation of the Zubr deal.

Is that picture of the 94 SSBM for real? It looks A LOT like the 92.
 

Chengdu J-10

Junior Member
Sometimes I get a feeling people are saying Chinese are building/buying new planes too slowly. Well, I've been checking out some procurement rate numbers... From 1995 until today, PLAAF and PLANAF seem to have procured over 950 newly built combat aircraft, which is something like 76 planes a year. And that is my very conservative estimate. Some stuff i had to basically guess, for rest i used figures given on sinodefence and huitong's site.

Breakdown would be something like this- remember from 1995 till today:
at least 343 newly built J7 (D, E, G models)
at least 275 newly built/bought su-27/30/j11 (included a token number of j11b)
at least 80 newly built j10 (interpolation from most often mentioned figures)
at least 80 newly built jh7/7a (same as above)
at least 72 newly built j8 (pure guess, i'd say very conservative)
at least 72 newly built q5 (again, pure guesswork)
at least 36 newly built h6 (this would be enough for two new units, even though usually it's said there's 2 units of H model alone, plus a unit of M model)

Now, that's a very fine procurement rate, though, i'm guessing, unsustainable, in light of new gen planes, increasing costs, etc. Future procurement rates are likely only to be slower, not faster. Now, if we accept a fact there are at least 1000 old combat planes to be replaced (500 old gen j7, 200 old gen j8, 400 q5, 50 old h6) that would take, realistically, not less than 18 years from now (with a 30% slow down in procurement rate in a 10 year period), not including possible replacements for the likes of current su27s etc.

I know some are going to say that future fleet size is bound to shrink, but i'd say the shrinking has already been done (from an onetime fleet that featured 3000 j6 alone) and in light of vast area to cover and combined china's neighbors fleets (SKorea, Japan, Taiwan, let alone the US) it would be a grave mistake to keep shrinking it further, certainly not under 2000 combat aircraft.
Hmm...thought that the PLAAF had 300+ Su-27/30 & J-11A/B
 

Totoro

Major
VIP Professional
In absolute numbers - yes. But, like the text points out, here i was adding up only aeroplanes procured from 1995 onwards. 26 sukhois were already procured before 1995 and they did not get counted here.
 

crobato

Colonel
VIP Professional
Its really hard to compute the J-8II and J-7 numbers. That's why we only have estimates based on a sustained average production rate.

Anyway, I expect the J-8II to be a lot more, assuming we count only the revised airframe (note the tip of the rudder, the green does not extend all the way up). There is probably at least six regiments of the J-8D (probably 180 aircraft), and now plus four regiments of the J-8F (around 120 aircraft), there should be at least 300 of the J-8D/F/H models.
 

Totoro

Major
VIP Professional
With D models being equipped with pl-11? That'd make 300 for BVR capable planes... That's another big thing happening with air forces in the last 10-15 years. From zero BVR combat planes they've went up to over 700, making it over a third of their entire combat plane inventory. At this pace, by 2015 that should increase to some 1300 units, or nearly two thirds of the total number.
 

crobato

Colonel
VIP Professional
With D models being equipped with pl-11? That'd make 300 for BVR capable planes... That's another big thing happening with air forces in the last 10-15 years. From zero BVR combat planes they've went up to over 700, making it over a third of their entire combat plane inventory. At this pace, by 2015 that should increase to some 1300 units, or nearly two thirds of the total number.

Not just D models, but some B models are upgraded to the D standard. This means upgrades on the radar, either an updated Type 208 (SR-8?) or KLJ-1 radar. Because of upgrades, its hard to tell where the real Ds begin and where the converted Bs stop. Hard to say if all the regiments are made of new Ds, and they could have mixed upgraded Bs too into the same regiment. These upgraded Bs are also capable of air to air refueling. The only way you can tell the upgraded Bs and the true Ds apart is from the top edge of the tail fin.

Some of these Ds in turn are upgraded to the F standard, and repainted into the same color (grey) but you can still identify them from the true F model because the upgraded Ds don't have double wing fences.

If one realizes the potential of the JH-7A for BVR as well, that's quite a fleet, and even more so if active radar guiding BVR is considered. A J-8D that is upgraded to an F standard using PL-12s can be a major threat to any F-16 out there.
 

King_Comm

Junior Member
VIP Professional
I don't think semi-active homing medium range missiles can offer any credible BVR capability, so the existing J-8's have to be upgraded to F standards so they can use PL-12's.
 

crobato

Colonel
VIP Professional
I don't think semi-active homing medium range missiles can offer any credible BVR capability, so the existing J-8's have to be upgraded to F standards so they can use PL-12's.

Actually SARH remains credible today. Look at all the excellent SAMs using that principle, like the Standards, the ESSM and the S-300s.

Though we don't know how exactly a PL-11B would perform, assuming you use an old AIM-7M as a baseline, that's still quite a potential threat. Of course, ARH is preferable, but still that is no excuse not to discount that SARH is still a threat.
 
Top