It's better to have a live, but highly damaged airframe, than a wreck and a pilot hoping opfor is not going to try to shoot him out of his parachute with guns. A partial loss can be retrofitted, while a loss will need to be replaced. Moreover, in this modern age, the loss of a highly-skilled pilot is almost impossible to replace.
Moreover, it impacts the tactical assessment. With Mach 3 speeds, you can increase the effective range of your missiles by making it so that the missile only needs to accelerate by Mach 1, meaning that your interception range vs AEW&C is further increased. Reducing the enemy NEZ down to 50 km also means that the opponent will need to fly their fighters even further away from your missiles and thus exposing them closer to your AEW&C + stealth fighter combo.
Somehow, I'm wondering if modern stealth fighter combat will begin to further resemble classical infantry combat. You'll be flying your aicraft in by columns, with the depth of column determining your strength. When AEW&C gets detected, you'll end up flying in two fighters from the back to shoot-and-scoot with long-range anti-AEW&C missiles. If they fail, the front line will attempt an intercept from long range, and then scoot away, hopefully before entering enemy fighter NEZ. Then the next few lines will attempt to knock out enemy fighters with AEW&C detection + EODAS tracking, willing to hit emergency power / speeds as needed to avoid a hard kill.