2026 Iran War Strategy and Analysis

NorthKimBestKim

New Member
Registered Member
Iranian delegation has left Pakistan, so Iran has presented its demands to the Trump regime.

Fresh update on Imperial military assets in the area:

Bush, Ford and Lincoln carriers are in place. This is 75% of all available "super" carriers.

Tripoli is there as well, whilst Boxer is underway. However, in Boxer's case, it is still unclear if Boxer will join or replace the Tripoli.

The number of Arleigh Burke destroyers deployed against Iran is now 18. That means Empire has another 35 available Arleigh Burkes for other places. Total of 53 available and another 20 are not available. Total of 73 Burkes.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

tamsen_ikard

Captain
Registered Member
Iranian delegation has left Pakistan, so Iran has presented its demands to the Trump regime.

Fresh update on Imperial military assets in the area:

Bush, Ford and Lincoln carriers are in place. This is 75% of all available "super" carriers.

Tripoli is there as well, whilst Boxer is underway. However, in Boxer's case, it is still unclear if Boxer will join or replace the Tripoli.

The number of Arleigh Burke destroyers deployed against Iran is now 18. That means Empire has another 35 available Arleigh Burkes for other places. Total of 53 available and another 20 are not available. Total of 73 Burkes.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
How come they have 60% available destroyers? Usually one third is available for deployment. One third in repair and one third in training/getting ready.
 

TPenglake

Junior Member
Registered Member
A reminder to people talking about the economic toll of the war for Iran, is that during its war with Iraq in the 80s rationing was imposed on the population. A population that not so long ago had to live on ration coupons for 8 years vs. a population that couldn't even take COVID lockdown for 3 weeks, you do the math.
 

protonme18

Junior Member
Registered Member
Trump ‘needs to get out of war and can’t figure out how’
An ex-official from the US says the fragile truce between Washington and Tehran will not result in a lasting peace, and a permanent end to the war needs to be achieved.
Ceasefires “don’t fix anything; they just stop things from getting worse”, said Michael Ratney, a former US ambassador to Saudi Arabia.
“It’s part of an answer to an immediate political problem, which is [that Trump] needs to get out of war and can’t figure out how to do that.”
Trump told reporters ⁠in Florida that Trump had decided to call off the planned Pakistan visit by US envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner because the talks in Islamabad involved too much travel and expense, and Iran’s latest peace offer was not good enough for him.

...


Told you guys how the way Trump think and talks that I mention earlier, all about day to day + billions - billions that he thinks he get, or report saying profit over the expenditures. With the food rationing post that I see of the US sailor lunch, and the above. He is eager for a way out, but then he thinks of the cost expenses incur which currently US can't afford already with their current financial situation and mounting losses of the earlier excursion....the way you grab this guy gonads are hitting the parts of high value targets, like using cheap drones to takeout refueler planes, radars etc. As long as it's a dollar more, then this will cause him pain. Your munition is 10 dollar, knocking out 20 dollar US soldier lunch boxes even simple stuff like this, will cost the military accountants to present him a report and get him mad....he did told stories before during his campaign, about the stupidity of turning on the aircraft carrier engine, and sailing thousands of miles away just to burn this cost and cost when he mock Biden or Obama of their stupidities in using US military for missions and yet HE HIMSELF DID EXACTLY THAT....you know how much the cost of turning on an aircraft carrier engine, with each entire logistics lugging the soldiers, planes, food, tankers, accompany ships here and there with who knows what mission that gets no return politically or perhaps even no profit. The entire carrier fleet hanging around there cost tens of millions a day, but did the Indian tankers buy enough oil thru US control Venezuela oil to offset these expenditures? Scott Bessent is busy instructing the agency officials to crunch these reports to Trump so at midnight or early morning he can read about those and posting his tweets depending on the mood or report summary. I read, Modi is trying to squeeze Apple of tens of billions thru Indian legal system and Tim Cook sensing the bad news, better gets out before this shit hits the fan and cause him the bad reputation of shifting production lines from China to India. The poor guy that is taking over him gets the blame. These crooked CEO, and I know exactly how this coconut Tim Cook thinks......oopsss I made a bad strategic business decision that now may cause Apple losses in billions....better I get out fast and handover to the next poor sod....being the Chair, I can then blame whatever else of this poor sod of a guy. I gets all the credit, and this poor sod gets all the blames for an Indian misadventures. Trump will definitely gets involve and Modi is finding leverage with Trump....what more better then to squeeze Apple for forcing me tariffs and buying expensive US oils. You can see these snakes of people playing these games irregardles of multiple lives of people affecting by their decision and way of thoughts

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Apple faces US$38B antitrust fine in India, eyes Trump card for relief

 
Last edited:

protonme18

Junior Member
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
orfirst-amendment-a0a2446832e8596e66c6fccb8426c8aa
Suspect was armed with multiple weapons at White House correspondents’ dinner


Trump dialing in AIPAC guys, hey guys, I need an assist for the midterm or else there will be no Israel. AIPAC replied they understood the mission, dials in Mossad, hey guys, I need a senario and sacrificial lamb, who's the fish we had now and set up for that guy to take action....all this drama to make a victim and symphathy votes. CIA better gets to it, where that guy watches,consume the information/frequent and who been primed and prep ready to take action once the inception signal/trigger sent....
 

Jaroslav

New Member
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
orfirst-amendment-a0a2446832e8596e66c6fccb8426c8aa
Suspect was armed with multiple weapons at White House correspondents’ dinner


Trump dialing in AIPAC guys, hey guys, I need an assist for the midterm or else there will be no Israel. AIPAC replied they understood the mission, dials in Mossad, hey guys, I need a senario and sacrificial lamb, who's the fish we had now and set up for that guy to take action....all this drama to make a victim and symphathy votes. CIA better gets to it, where that guy watches,consume the information/frequent and who been primed and prep ready to take action once the inception signal/trigger sent....

Page unavailable​

 

plawolf

Lieutenant General
Is the U.S. Blockade of Iran a Winning Strategy or a Strategic Gamble?

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Regards,

The U.S. blockade must have the Iranian strategists rolling around from laughing too hard.

Iranian’s core strategic advantage lies in its ability to inflict unacceptable economic, industrial and social pain on the collective west through blocking one of the world’s primary sources of critical resources.

But such blockages are not precise, which was a big part of the reason why Iran floated its tolls idea in the first place. That was a compromise to avoid uniting the whole world against them. In reality, the tolls massively weakened Iran’s strategic position because it allowed the continued outflow of oil and gas. Such commodities cannot be controlled or restricted once out in the open market, and even in the brief window the tolls were operating we saw shipments being rerouted before they even reached port.

With its counter blockade, America gifted Iran the full power of its most powerful strategic weapon while also removing the lion share of the costs to Iran of using it, and also upgraded the efficiency of said weapon. Now, not a drop of oil is leaving the Gulf, and the whole world blames America, not Iran for this.

As demand continue to far outstrip supply, and with the west having already cut itself off from Russian sources, it’s actually hilariously likely that the west, Europe in particular, will suffer a massive fuel shortage, with knock on devastating impacts to its real economy as industrial output slows or even outright stops and social unrest skyrockets from fuel shortages, rationing and potentially even food shortages and power outages.

The biggest problem Iran had was that its supply side moves had massive lead times before the effects start to be felt. In the meantime America could cause real damage and pain. The original calculous was that the strategic fight was equivalent to Iran slowly strangling America while America was punching daggers into its guts. The winner was the one who can outlast the other, but the odds were in America’s favour as they could have have months to bomb Iran and do all sorts of irreversible damage to its economy before its own economy started taking serious damage from the oil and gas supply disruption.

The ceasefire and blockade is really the worse of all worlds for America. As it’s stopped it’s strikes while actively helping Iran to make the supply side disruption far more airtight than Iran could have reasonably expected to be able to achieve on its own.

It’s like America stopped stabbing Iran because Iran was needling its hands holding the daggers too hard as they were stabbing Iran in the guys. Demanded that Iran take their hands off its throat, and when Iran refused, pulled a plastic bag over its own head thinking he is somehow also suffocating Iran.

Time is rapidly running out for America, and soon its own allies are going to start begging and demanding an end to the blockade as their own economies start to collapse.

The longer Iran can stretch out the peace talks and the longer the American blockade stays in place, the stronger Iran’s strategic position becomes.
 

GZDRefugee

Senior Member
Registered Member
The U.S. blockade must have the Iranian strategists rolling around from laughing too hard.

Iranian’s core strategic advantage lies in its ability to inflict unacceptable economic, industrial and social pain on the collective west through blocking one of the world’s primary sources of critical resources.

But such blockages are not precise, which was a big part of the reason why Iran floated its tolls idea in the first place. That was a compromise to avoid uniting the whole world against them. In reality, the tolls massively weakened Iran’s strategic position because it allowed the continued outflow of oil and gas. Such commodities cannot be controlled or restricted once out in the open market, and even in the brief window the tolls were operating we saw shipments being rerouted before they even reached port.

With its counter blockade, America gifted Iran the full power of its most powerful strategic weapon while also removing the lion share of the costs to Iran of using it, and also upgraded the efficiency of said weapon. Now, not a drop of oil is leaving the Gulf, and the whole world blames America, not Iran for this.

As demand continue to far outstrip supply, and with the west having already cut itself off from Russian sources, it’s actually hilariously likely that the west, Europe in particular, will suffer a massive fuel shortage, with knock on devastating impacts to its real economy as industrial output slows or even outright stops and social unrest skyrockets from fuel shortages, rationing and potentially even food shortages and power outages.

The biggest problem Iran had was that its supply side moves had massive lead times before the effects start to be felt. In the meantime America could cause real damage and pain. The original calculous was that the strategic fight was equivalent to Iran slowly strangling America while America was punching daggers into its guts. The winner was the one who can outlast the other, but the odds were in America’s favour as they could have have months to bomb Iran and do all sorts of irreversible damage to its economy before its own economy started taking serious damage from the oil and gas supply disruption.

The ceasefire and blockade is really the worse of all worlds for America. As it’s stopped it’s strikes while actively helping Iran to make the supply side disruption far more airtight than Iran could have reasonably expected to be able to achieve on its own.

It’s like America stopped stabbing Iran because Iran was needling its hands holding the daggers too hard as they were stabbing Iran in the guys. Demanded that Iran take their hands off its throat, and when Iran refused, pulled a plastic bag over its own head thinking he is somehow also suffocating Iran.

Time is rapidly running out for America, and soon its own allies are going to start begging and demanding an end to the blockade as their own economies start to collapse.

The longer Iran can stretch out the peace talks and the longer the American blockade stays in place, the stronger Iran’s strategic position becomes.
You're overlooking the fact that Iran is running out of storage space for extracted oil. When no more oil can be stored, wells will have to be stopped. This is often a permanent loss of the well. Iran won't be able to sustain fighting if they have no revenue.
 

GodRektsNoobs

Senior Member
Registered Member
The U.S. blockade must have the Iranian strategists rolling around from laughing too hard.

Iranian’s core strategic advantage lies in its ability to inflict unacceptable economic, industrial and social pain on the collective west through blocking one of the world’s primary sources of critical resources.

But such blockages are not precise, which was a big part of the reason why Iran floated its tolls idea in the first place. That was a compromise to avoid uniting the whole world against them. In reality, the tolls massively weakened Iran’s strategic position because it allowed the continued outflow of oil and gas. Such commodities cannot be controlled or restricted once out in the open market, and even in the brief window the tolls were operating we saw shipments being rerouted before they even reached port.

With its counter blockade, America gifted Iran the full power of its most powerful strategic weapon while also removing the lion share of the costs to Iran of using it, and also upgraded the efficiency of said weapon. Now, not a drop of oil is leaving the Gulf, and the whole world blames America, not Iran for this.

As demand continue to far outstrip supply, and with the west having already cut itself off from Russian sources, it’s actually hilariously likely that the west, Europe in particular, will suffer a massive fuel shortage, with knock on devastating impacts to its real economy as industrial output slows or even outright stops and social unrest skyrockets from fuel shortages, rationing and potentially even food shortages and power outages.

The biggest problem Iran had was that its supply side moves had massive lead times before the effects start to be felt. In the meantime America could cause real damage and pain. The original calculous was that the strategic fight was equivalent to Iran slowly strangling America while America was punching daggers into its guts. The winner was the one who can outlast the other, but the odds were in America’s favour as they could have have months to bomb Iran and do all sorts of irreversible damage to its economy before its own economy started taking serious damage from the oil and gas supply disruption.

The ceasefire and blockade is really the worse of all worlds for America. As it’s stopped it’s strikes while actively helping Iran to make the supply side disruption far more airtight than Iran could have reasonably expected to be able to achieve on its own.

It’s like America stopped stabbing Iran because Iran was needling its hands holding the daggers too hard as they were stabbing Iran in the guys. Demanded that Iran take their hands off its throat, and when Iran refused, pulled a plastic bag over its own head thinking he is somehow also suffocating Iran.

Time is rapidly running out for America, and soon its own allies are going to start begging and demanding an end to the blockade as their own economies start to collapse.

The longer Iran can stretch out the peace talks and the longer the American blockade stays in place, the stronger Iran’s strategic position becomes.
You are missing one part of the picture: the US is decoupling from the "West" and are using the blockade as a means to strangle the Western world order in order to appropriate the European, Japanese, and Korean economies/technologies. That leaves them with only 2 choices: either to transfer their industrial/technological strength to the US, or be good cannon fodders and help the US attack Iran.
 

Serb

Senior Member
Registered Member
You're overlooking the fact that Iran is running out of storage space for extracted oil. When no more oil can be stored, wells will have to be stopped. This is often a permanent loss of the well. Iran won't be able to sustain fighting if they have no revenue.

Why would external revenue even be the main issue right now?

As long as Iran’s internal industrial base is still functioning, it still has the stronger hand.

This is a country that ranks among the top 10 in the world in primary energy consumption.

How much bombing do people think it would take to actually grind that war machine to a halt, especially when the US is already burning through its own stockpiles at a stupid rate?

And those 10 or 20 ships that used to pass through for tolls are not some decisive factor.

Iran’s real economic lifeline is China.

And I do not believe for a second that China would hesitate to extend enough “humanitarian” goods, credit, or indirect support when US officials have basically admitted this whole theater, including Iran and even Venezuela, is part of a broader attempt to strangle China itself.

So the logic is not complicated.

If someone openly threatens to choke you to death, then gets stuck in a war and starts losing badly, and all you have to do is help the guy fighting him by passing along useful things from a distance, why would you not do it?

China is many things, but it is not some harmless Buddha floating above reality.
 
Top