2025 Victory Day parade thread (workup, 3rd Sept)
- Thread starter Blitzo
- Start date
So that warhead thing is indeed for DF-5?(Continued from last post...)
He wrote "I'm not responsible for its accuracy" meaning we cannot give an answer to that question, and should take the designations with some salt rather than take it too seriously yet.
It is abundantly clear that one can never have too many good things, and no nation would ever complain about possessing too many powerful weapons. This is especially critical for the PLA to recognize in the face of the severe pressure currently exerted by the United States in aerospace domains. Even though the PLA now commands formidable strategic nuclear strike capabilities and hypersonic weapon systems, this does not mean it can rest on its laurels. We must acknowledge the formidable R&D capabilities demonstrated by some U.S. private enterprises. While the U.S. military itself may be temporarily lagging, SpaceX's engineers certainly won't grow complacent. Furthermore, while the PLA may temporarily focus solely on establishing an area denial defense system within the Asia-Pacific region, this does not preclude the PLA from eventually developing an urgent need for global strike capabilities. Given that competition with the United States will inevitably be comprehensive, we cannot place excessive faith in other regional powers to reliably fulfill their “tasks.”
I suspect this warhead system can obviously be configured for more than one type of intercontinental ballistic missile. Otherwise, I don't believe developing a dedicated warhead solely for an older missile variant would hold such immense strategic significance. Not to mention, we've already seen the emergence of the DF-XX silo-based missile, haven't we?
It'd qualify as one of his '', I reckon.
The funny thing is this USV would probably be pretty good at taking out ROC's upcoming USV:
It's kind of a torpedo boat vs torpdeo boat destroyer situation again.
