SampanViking, I think you're moving too fast. It normally takes weeks to investigate complex chains of events as happened in Odessa yesterday.
I apologize if you got offended by my post (#1268 here)!
Fair point and no I am never offended by far criticism. You are right if you want to know who said and ordered what, but tt would make the forum a pretty slow place if we had to wait for the definitive answers before we discussed.
Some things are available straight away, thanks mainly to modern social media and of course the plethora of news channels.
1) Turchynov specifically identifies Odessa as a target to stop Pro Federalists only two days before the event.
2) Hardcore football hooligans from the fans of both sides of a football match Chernomorets and Metalic Kharkov march together with other Pro Maidan supporters including Right Sector militants!
This is weird by itself as opposing hooligans usually are too busy taking lumps out of each other, to band together.
In addition, as a member of the UK generation that grew up while Ulster was in the deepest throes of the troubles, I have no doubt about the significance of "marches" in areas of sectarian division.
3) The far smaller Pro-Russian gathering is referred to consistently as a rally. This means people meeting at a fixed point, and there is no mention of any march involved in their activities.
4) The presence of a leading Pro-Russian local politician and Mayoral candidate.
With across the board elections due in less than four weeks, the assumption that the rally is an election rally for this local leader and candidate is hardly a leap of deduction. This is only compounded by the location and its significance as you yourself pointed out today.
5) The Pro Maidan marchers made their way from the where they started and came to where the rally was taking place.
Given that the rally did not include a march, but was taking place in a single location means that there is no other possible explanation for the two groups coming into contact with each other.
There have been reports of clashes with the Pro Maidan marchers before they arrived at the rally. This again is no surprise if they were marching by or through strongly pro Russian neighbourhoods en-route. This sort of thing will always cause trouble during times of sectarian tension and such problems persist each year to this very day, over Loyalist marches through Republican areas of Belfast.
This ignores the notion of a small group attacking a another group that was ten times there size. That is a greater willing suspension of disbelief than I am prepared to give
6) Ukrainian politics are a rich man's game, especially at regional level or mayoral level for a major city and regional Capital. Albu will then be a wealthy man and if joined by more senior party bigwigs, they would be very wealthy men as well. Such men in Ukraine will have bodyguards and these bodyguards will be armed.
This to me is the obvious explanation for how some Pro Maidan marchers were shot and killed when the rioting started as these body guards will have no qualms over using deadly force if their employers are in danger. Also, lets be honest, if you want to stop a movement spreading into your city, leadership decapitation is a good option and hiding it in a riot at a political rally as good a way of doing it as I can think of.
Further of course, had this been a militant rally of little green men with Kalashnikovs that came under attack, then there would have been far more fatalities and mostly form the Pro-Maidan side.
7) The VIP's and the rally supporters fell back from the square to the assumed protection of the Trade Unions House to escape the riot. We all know what happened next and Mr Albu could easily have been a victim in the fire.
So we may not know who said what to who and why certain things happened etc, but I am confident that the above is the general gist of the events based by what is already in the public domain. Once again, I would welcome any further information; supporting or detracting, if anyone has it.