Ukraine war and recent Iran-Israel clash and all the houthi-US fight has shown that subsonic missiles are very easy to shoot down.Why are people complaining about the choice of AShM on the 54B again? In the cluttered littorals, at short range, under space constraints, the YJ-83 is likely the most reliable choice. It has a imaging infrared seeker and is reliable at navigating cluttered battlespaces. I would not trust a "small hypersonic missile" to be able to perform the same roles at all. If opposing warships can hide in the shadows of islands and civilian maritime traffic, then a subsonic missile is the best option.
They can only act as a decoy to waste interceptor missiles. Air/Missile defense technology is now advanced enough that only high supersonic and hypersonic missiles have any realistic chance of penetrating the dense air defense of a navy ship; let alone a proper naval battle group consisting of several destroyers and cruisers.
Most frigate designs around the world typically can only carry around 4-8 anti-ship missiles. I would argue that it makes much more sense to make those 8 missiles useful in terms AD penetration capability.