Its weird why does China accomodate so few VLS cells in its frigate? New russian Gorskov class frigate have more VLS cells than type 52D destroyer. Is it cost saving mechanism or design issue?
Its weird why does China accomodate so few VLS cells in its frigate? New russian Gorskov class frigate have more VLS cells than type 52D destroyer. Is it cost saving mechanism or design issue?
Thanks for clarification.... Gorshkov class has 32 Redut VLS for SAMs and 16 UKSK VLS for missiles -- that's 48 VLS total.
The improved Gorshkov will supposedly have the same number of Redut cells but 24 UKSK cells -- that is 56 VLS total.
052D has 64 UVLS total.
054A has 32 VLS cells and 8 slant launch AShMs.
Normal Gorshkov class displaces 5400 tons full.
054A displaces 4000 tons full.
The number of VLS cells in Chinese surface combatants is appropriate and normal, and not "weird".
Number of VLS cells isn't a (...) measuring game. It's math, math of intended purpose of the warship against its lifetime cost.Its weird why does China accomodate so few VLS cells in its frigate?
I'm more keen to learn the status of quad-packed development, of PLAN. Wonder anyone can provide an update, please. From their test ship?
Maybe we should warm up this thread
I sure hope Interstellar is talking about a different project but the second Pakistani 054A's keel-laying ceremony was conducted recently.View attachment 58682View attachment 58683