052C/052D Class Destroyers

Tam

Brigadier
Registered Member
Some high-resolution images of DDG 121 carrying out a live-fire exercise.

50750812193_3df2f0586c_h.jpg

50751549436_1574e32768_h.jpg

50750812318_0bdc52b408_h.jpg

50750812418_5bc600b3b5_h.jpg
50750812568_f49ce65376_h.jpg


It kind of looks to me that the target drones are fired off from a large auxiliary deep ocean tugboat.
 

by78

General
It kind of looks to me that the target drones are fired off from a large auxiliary deep ocean tugboat.

I think they were fired off a PLAN warship. The deck markings are different from the tugboat's landing pad. Also note the circular metal grate (for a helicopter to secure itself onto), which the tugboat lacks.
 

Tetrach

Junior Member
Registered Member
Isn't the HHQ-9 canister cylindrical?

It's only cylindrical for Type 52C, where the canister a navalised version of the HQ-9 (land). You can see it being loaded in the B-203 style drum launcher.

hq9-reload4.jpg


hq9-reload2.jpg

But then when you look at the Type 52D, you can see it has a much more squared shape.

052d-hq9-fire2.jpg

I guess it's easier and more optimal when developing a new canister to make it square shaped. If the PLAN intends to develop new missiles for this class, they're probably gonna take this canister as a baseline.
 
Last edited:

Tam

Brigadier
Registered Member
It's only cylindrical for Type 52C, where the canister a navalised version of the HQ-9 (land). You can see it being loaded in the B-203 style drum launcher.

View attachment 66952


View attachment 66953

But then when you look at the Type 52D, you can see it has a much more squared shape.

View attachment 66954

I guess it's easier and more optimal when developing a new canister to make it square shaped. If the PLAN intends to develop new missiles for this class, they're probably gonna take this canister as a baseline.


Its okay. I think I mixed up my memory with the YJ-18 canister.


003.jpg
 
Top