does this mean it will be wider than earlier estimates?Close-up view of the hull cross-section - The hull wall isn't entirely vertical, but with a slight outward slant of 3-5 degrees on both sides from the hangar deck level. Posted by @一定会对蛙动手 on Weibo.
View attachment 172902 View attachment 172903
If the shape of that superstructure mock up is accurate to that intended for real thing, it suggest to me the new carrier will use some new smaller AESA panels, possible the same aperture distributed over more separate panels? because the main facets on that mockup seem too small to accommodate the customary type 346 panels. On the 003 the diagonal facets are substantially larger to accommodate the 346 panels.
Not in any significant sense, waterline is capped at 42.8m while deck was already measured to 84-85m from mockup. The slope outward is probably meant to support the larger deck.aaaaaaaaaa
does this mean it will be wider than earlier estimates?
The lower central red circle is part of the original island structure of the ex-Varyag, i.e. the current Dalian CV 16.Island. Also 2 waist catapults for a total of 4?
View attachment 173039
My bad, I was thinking it looked too unnecessarily big for a nuclear carrier. Do you know why they kept the structure there for so long?The lower central red circle is the original island structure of the ex-Varyag, i.e. the current Dalian CV 16.