Won't it be more likely that the PLANAF will adopt an improved CM-400AKG version for its carrier fighters ? I mean, I find the insistence that the J-15 can (or in some cases must) carry the YJ-12 to be somewhat shoe horned . The YJ-12 can serve as the Grand Slam bomb of all Chinese air launched AShM, whereas the CM-400AKGs with its lighter weight and smaller dimensions would be much more easily handled aboard the tight confines of a carrier.
Carrying three 2 ton missiles on the J-15 would be stretching it to its limits, nor is it a tactically feasible notion. The drag and weight would badly affect the fighter's flight performance.
I agree, and the idea that you could station two of those outboard is really pushing the limits of physics... the article posted above comparing the J-15 to the SU-33 stated their dimensions were nearly identical, Shenyang did NOT mess around with the design, other than for instance construction the vertical and horizontal stabilizers from carbon fibre....
so the conjecture by some posters that the J-15 has greatly expanded load bearing capacity is a null,, just did not happen, in spite of the Flankers tremendous strength and load bearing, fuel carrying capacity, or maybe because the Flanker is already design optimized for maximum strength and load carrying ability
So assuming your adversary were as capable as the USN, there is NO WAY, you would compromise your range to that extent,,,, going back to the movie Top Gun, the Captain gets more and more agitated the closer the "Mig's" get to the carrier, a very accurate reflection of real life.. So a J-15 might actually be able to carry a YJ-12 off the catapult, but it is extremely unlikely to launch off the ramp with 1, much less three...