两眼
两眼
Don't know why people are making a mountain out of a molehill out of this.
I mean yeah, I know why Western propagandists are doing that, but I don't know why people who are supporters of a strong China are doing so.
The ambassador was responding to questions about Crimea, which he pointed out that it was originally Russian. Then the interviewer claimed that under "International Law", Crimea belonged to Ukraine. Well no, that's bogus. There's no "International Law" that says Crimea belonged to Ukraine. There are countries that recognize Ukraine's sovereignty over Crimea, and now, there are countries that recognize Russia's sovereignty over Crimea. What Amb. Lu pointed out was this simple fact. Sovereignty is based on international *recognition*, there's no "law" that concretized the borders of ex-Soviet countries. Ukraine had Crimea, and now it doesn't, and pretty soon, it won't have the eastern half of Ukraine either.
If I was the ambassador, I would have asked the interviewer where was his precious international law when France invaded China in the 19th century.
JFL at the coping Jai Hinds in the comments
There is difference between Europe and Non Europe that most people overlook.They didn't say anything doesn't mean they didn't care
I keep hearing from caucasoids that freedom and liberal democracy is what sours innovation. Surely, it cannot be that the free and Democratic Anglo led west would resort to stealing from godless communist Chinese can it?
Same energyI keep hearing from caucasoids that freedom and liberal democracy is what sours innovation. Surely, it cannot be that the free and Democratic Anglo led west would resort to stealing from godless communist Chinese can it?
also, qatar caught some Indian spies and will execute them
it gets better, these so called spies weren’t spying for India, but for Israel!
The ambassador's remarks were obviously exaggerated and taken out of context.It’s funny, I see a lot of reaction to what the Chinese ambassador to France said, in French. Yet I have not seen a full transcript of what exactly he is suppose to have said.
This seems suspiciously like the using of deliberate mistranslations to create sensationalist stories that the west has been engaged in against China since forever. The only difference is that because the original interview was in French, it’s not as easy for Chinese users to see through the obvious and transparent lie.