Video with English subtitles
Video with English subtitles
Play stupid games (Taiwanese rebels egging for independence) win stupid prizes --- hollowing out of TSMC and now bitching to their master like Uncle Wong to tone down anti-China rhetoric and actions.
It means nothing much to Huawei. The US is gaining advantage mostly from players other than Chinese vendors.So what does that mean for Huawei? Can they still maintain their marginal edge/global leadership moving forward? How much will Huawei's future growth in this area require diplomatic support from the CPC to encourage allies and partners (outside of the US vassalsphere) to use Huawei instead of Ericsson/Samsung/Nokia/Cisco? Likewise on the data center/SW stack side. It's good that Huawei is heavily in this space, but can they grow their market share outside of China? If Samsung/Ericsson/Nokia are going to lose a serious chunk of their profits to AWS and other US companies, is this a good thing on balance for Huawei? Neutral? Disadvantageous? Wouldn't Ericsson/Samsung/Nokia losing their profits help Huawei in the sense that its direct competitors have less to spend on R&D in this area? I guess at this point it's almost like I'm asking you to read the tea leaves on the future of Huawei, Chinese 6G, etc. vis a vis their competitors in the West+vassalsphere.
Play stupid games (Taiwanese rebels egging for independence) win stupid prizes --- hollowing out of TSMC and now bitching to their master like Uncle Wong to tone down anti-China rhetoric and actions.
Remember when the term "4th Industrial Revolution" was first bantered about, they said China would not be able to compete? I think they said South Korea and Germany were going to first winners of the 4th Industrial Revolution. China is the only game in town.
Chickens have come home to roost for Cisco, who tried to kill Huawei. Now it is they who will be buried.
By the only laws that the anglos respect: Vae Victus. Woe to the Conquered.
Taiwan (FM) predicts timeline for conflict with China
A military conflict between China and Taiwan could take place in 2027, the self-governing island’s Foreign Minister Joseph Wu has claimed.
Appearing on the UK’s LBC radio station on Thursday, Wu said: “We are taking the Chinese military threat very seriously… I think 2027 is the year that we need to be serious about.”
Wu’s assessment of China-Taiwan relations echoes that outlined by CIA Director William Burns in February.
Appearing on CBS’ Face the Nation, he claimed that “President Xi has instructed the PLA, the Chinese military leadership, to be ready by 2027 to invade Taiwan.” He added, however, that this alone does not mean Beijing had “decided to invade in 2027 or any other year.”
I'm not sure I understand what he's trying to say? Does he mean there are no UN resolutions recognizing the formation of these states? That sounds wrong.