Miscellaneous News

Stierlitz

Junior Member
Registered Member
Taiwan is keen for the US to scale back on its anti-China stance amid concerns that scare stories about the dangers of relying on chips made on the island nation are harming the country's business interests.


According to reports, Taiwanese officials have engaged in informal discussions with their American counterparts in efforts to tone down emotive claims that it is dangerous to count on chips manufactured there. Such claims were sparked by China's insistence that Taiwan is a renegade province which it intends to reclaim using military force if necessary.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

taxiya

Brigadier
Registered Member
So what does that mean for Huawei? Can they still maintain their marginal edge/global leadership moving forward? How much will Huawei's future growth in this area require diplomatic support from the CPC to encourage allies and partners (outside of the US vassalsphere) to use Huawei instead of Ericsson/Samsung/Nokia/Cisco? Likewise on the data center/SW stack side. It's good that Huawei is heavily in this space, but can they grow their market share outside of China? If Samsung/Ericsson/Nokia are going to lose a serious chunk of their profits to AWS and other US companies, is this a good thing on balance for Huawei? Neutral? Disadvantageous? Wouldn't Ericsson/Samsung/Nokia losing their profits help Huawei in the sense that its direct competitors have less to spend on R&D in this area? I guess at this point it's almost like I'm asking you to read the tea leaves on the future of Huawei, Chinese 6G, etc. vis a vis their competitors in the West+vassalsphere.
It means nothing much to Huawei. The US is gaining advantage mostly from players other than Chinese vendors.

For the market outside of China, it doesn't make difference from today because operator is either buying Huawei package or Non-Huawei package. It is the Non-Huawei package going to have more US content in cloud RAN. It is totally up to the operator to choose. A decision that they are already doing today.

The idea of Cloud RAN is something advocated by US operators. But it has gained some traction from vendors in the rest of world including Chinese. So it isn't really something USG is doing evil (not regarding this part in 6G at least), nor is what S/E/N or Huawei wanted. The vendors are just playing along meeting the desire of operators. The difference is that China (Huawei, Alibaba etc.) has made a strategic choice to build a strong cloud computing infrastructure while Europe didn't and SK is too small to afford it. This makes Huawei being the only mobile vendor who has everything and China being the only country strong in everything.

S/E/N simply have no choice as of today, so doesn't matter what they think or want. That is the major difference of them with China. Their advancement (including Japan) are built on sandy foundation (US). They may be advanced in certain area, but there is always the leach on the neck.
 
Last edited:

daifo

Major
Registered Member
Play stupid games (Taiwanese rebels egging for independence) win stupid prizes --- hollowing out of TSMC and now bitching to their master like Uncle Wong to tone down anti-China rhetoric and actions.

70 years of observing the US behavior and conflicts post ww2, these fools still haven't realized that they are cannon fodder in the grand hegemony game.
 

taxiya

Brigadier
Registered Member
addition to #69,325

A possible political solution is for a country or EU who does not want US built cloud infrastructure to enforce their operators to only build traditional mobile networks, a solution that S/E/N would welcome. Cloud RAN is worse in performance than transitional network due to the transmission of vast raw data to compute center from the base station. It may have some cost advantage in building. So it isn't something really technically advanced, but rather more of a change of business model. So a political choice is feasible.
 

AssassinsMace

Lieutenant General
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Chickens have come home to roost for Cisco, who tried to kill Huawei. Now it is they who will be buried.

By the only laws that the anglos respect: Vae Victus. Woe to the Conquered.
Remember when the term "4th Industrial Revolution" was first bantered about, they said China would not be able to compete? I think they said South Korea and Germany were going to first winners of the 4th Industrial Revolution. China is the only game in town.
 

FriedButter

Brigadier
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

For someone who wants to “wind down the narrative” they instead hopped onto the band wagon. I do wonder why they are so fixated on 2027 (or 2025).

Taiwan (FM) predicts timeline for conflict with China​

A military conflict between China and Taiwan could take place in 2027, the self-governing island’s Foreign Minister Joseph Wu has claimed.

Appearing on the UK’s LBC radio station on Thursday, Wu said: “We are taking the Chinese military threat very seriously… I think 2027 is the year that we need to be serious about.
Wu’s assessment of China-Taiwan relations echoes that outlined by CIA Director William Burns in February.

Appearing on CBS’ Face the Nation, he claimed that “President Xi has instructed the PLA, the Chinese military leadership, to be ready by 2027 to invade Taiwan.” He added, however, that this alone does not mean Beijing had “decided to invade in 2027 or any other year.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

baykalov

Senior Member
Registered Member
Has there ever been a more parasitic government than the Kiev regime?!

Deputy Foreign Minister of Ukraine Andrij Melnyk calculated how much money Ukraine needs - all partners should give 1% of their GDP: "Ukraine needs 10 times as much supplies to win the war".

Ukraine orders British оil and gas giant Shell donate more than $1 billion in unexpected profits from the potential sale of its assets in Russia. Ukraine normalizes robbery by extorting cash under threat of placement on war supporter list. "Energy firm has a moral duty to donate surprise wartime windfall, Kyiv says."
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

:oops: :
 
Top