I reply to the post when I read it up to that point. If you did not make your self clear up to that point, I suggest you make a better effort next time.
This makes sense, I accept this argument. So lets go and see where in my post I said
You sound like trying to make USA 2.0 out of China by 1 treating allies as vessel state and 2 exporting ideology. Seems that you don't love China to be China but another USA instead.
My post:
This Xi-Putin meeting and it's results pretty much signals that Russia is to become a junior partner of China, China's Canada, and basically becoming (non-PR version) an economic colony.
Given others reaction I suppose your objections are on me saying "junior partner". If its that, tbh, although your point stands that I should respond based on what I wrote on my first post, I will have to point you to my responses to solarz on that matter. They encapsulate a summary of my thoughts on this specific issue. I am not going to write it again because it will be duplicated effort.
So moving on, maybe you also take offense at the "economic colony" phrase. This was partly addressed on one of my posts to solarz on how Russia will heavily depend on Chinese high-tech in the coming years. Something new which I didn't write before is that Putin himself has said that they will freely allow Chinese companies to enter Russia's market. Expect the Western market share to be captured by China. This would allow China to do what every industrialised country does to everyone else, dump its products to their markets.
The economic colony phrase certainly carries negative meaning but I also found it as the most accurate. I will avoid using it in the future, if you have any good alternative word, I would be open to using it.
Russia will become wealthy, now how that wealth will be distributed among its people, that's another matter. People might be tempted to say "Not China's problem!", but human psychology doesn't work like that. With this new arrangement, China should aim to encourage/push Russia towards a more equal distribution of wealth that what they have currently
On this section you probably mean the last sentence where you think I advocate for interference in internal affairs aka USA 2.0. My thoughts are a lot more complex than that surface reading. I expanded a bit on them in a later post in response to someone else (CMP maybe?) who actually had a better idea than mine which I prefer tbh. My overall point was for a more sustainable partnership in the future.
You sound like trying to make USA 2.0 out of China by 1 treating allies
Btw, before throwing random words, you should at least know what relationship China and Russia currently have. The official Chinese diplomatic position is that China and Russia are not allies. If you dont even know what type of relations Russia and China have with each other, what makes you think you know enough to talk about more complicated aspects of their relationship.