Miscellaneous News

siegecrossbow

Field Marshall
Staff member
Super Moderator
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Lankford: It has been reported publicly that SVB had a large number of Chinese investors that are there including some that are companies directly connected to the Chinese Communist Party. Will those individuals, companies, entities, and investors that are Chinese investors be made whole based on assessments in my banks in Oklahoma? So what I’m asking is, will my banks in Oklahoma pay a special assessment to be able to make Chinese investors whole from Silicon Valley Bank?

LMAO someone remind me what caused Credit Sussy to whore itself out to UBS again.
 

Jingle Bells

Junior Member
Registered Member
Your statistics is 10 ad hominems per 10 paragraphs literally before an even bigger finishing ad hominem of a whole, separate paragraph to finish it like a cherry on top. I imagine you reading it and thinking how smart you are.
I am asking for your statistics, because you are the one trying to make a point.

"increasing weapon sales and deals toward countries that are directly going against China", give me the numbers please. How much arms sales before and after? To which countries exactly? How are they even relevant in comparison to China's military growth?

"new military bases around China": again, give me the numbers please, how many bases around Chinese before and after, at least show it on a graph to support your point. Your original point was that US sanctions and aggressive behaviors are working against China because they tarnish China's reputation and make people think China is weak. Well, show me with numbers how much US has step up their military build up against China around China, and how does that increase US militaristic advantages against China. Because if US "stepped-up" action is outmatched or even dwarfed by China in the same region, that would hardly be a US show of force.

"more millitary alliances": Please tell me with whom? With whom that was not already a US ally decades ago already? What formal alliance did the US newly form around China? Please point at least one out.

"more soldiers stationed near China" Again, numbers. At least give some numbers. At least show a numerical increase. How many US soldiers were stationed near China before, and how many now? Numbers will really show your point. Not just claims.

"more frequent freedom of navigation exercises", again, if you think this is somehow more aggressive and effective than China building actual artificial islands capable of stationing fleets of large aircrafts in South China Sea, that's your right. But that won't be very convincing. Besides, in terms of military presence, are they actually sailing more often in Asia Pacific? Are you saying that they don't sail in Asian Pacific waters with the same frequency before? Just by calling it "freedom of navigation" sails neither increased nor decreased their presence in the region. Show me the numbers comparison before and after in the region. If they already sails around in the region in the same frequency (but just didn't call it "freedom of navigation") before they started this own "freedom of navigation" campaign, than that's nothing but a publicity stunt.

You give a point, then finalize it with an ad hominem, as to cement its validity and to make you appear smarter.

There is no point in arguing anymore, because you are just going to introduce some new, more creative ways to describe myself instead of actually thinking about my points.

While I honestly don't care to waste my time and analyze you, so I could respond in a same fashion.

You are just like some western redditor.
废话。
 
Last edited:

Serb

Senior Member
Registered Member
I am asking for your statistics, because you are the one trying to make a point.

"increasing weapon sales and deals toward countries that are directly going against China", give me the numbers please. How much arms sales before and after? To which countries exactly? How are they even relevant in comparison to China's military growth?

"new military bases around China": again, give me the numbers please, how many bases around Chinese before and after, at least show it on a graph to support your point. Your original point was that US sanctions and aggressive behaviors are working against China because they tarnish China's reputation and make people think China is weak. Well, show me with numbers how much US has step up their military build up against China around China, and how does that increase US militaristic advantages against China. Because if US "stepped-up" action is unmatched or even dwarfed by China in the same region, that would hardly be a US show of force.

"more millitary alliances": Please tell me with whom? With whom that was not already a US ally decades ago already? What formal alliance did the US newly form around China? Please point at least one out.

"more soldiers stationed near China" Again, numbers. At least give some numbers. At least show a numerical increase. How many US soldiers were stationed near China before, and how many now? Numbers will really show your point. Not just claims.

"more frequent freedom of navigation exercises", again, if you think this is somehow more aggressive and effective than China building actual artificial islands capable of stationing fleets of large aircrafts in South China Sea, that's your right. But that won't be very convincing. Besides, in terms of military presence, are they actually sailing more often in Asia Pacific? Are you saying that they don't sail in Asian Pacific waters with the same frequency before? Just by calling it "freedom of navigation" sails neither increased nor decreased their presence in the region. Show me the numbers comparison before and after in the region. If they already sails around in the region in the same frequency (but just didn't call it "freedom of navigation") before they started this own "freedom of navigation" campaign, than that's nothing but a publicity stunt.


废话。


This is a conversation thread, not a theme specific thread. I can't go into such details here and spam the news thread with old news, links, proofs, huge essays, etc. I'm not that autistic. This is where you give a couple of sentences, I give a couple of sentences, etc. No need to be so serious and furious.

I would finalize this by saying that China's power projection in 2022 was enough imo, after Pelosi's visit, probably why more countries around the world got confidence in China like Saudi Arabia.

However now, due all the newfound developments and moves made by the US side, since then for 2023 and beyond, China must also increase its response levels to match US provocation levels if it wants to keep its image around.
 

Jingle Bells

Junior Member
Registered Member
This is a conversation thread, not a theme specific thread. I can't go into such details here and spam the news thread with old news, links, proofs, huge essays, etc. I'm not that autistic. This is where you give a couple of sentences, I give a couple of sentences, etc. No need to be so serious and furious.
Don't just pile a whole list of news and reports, summarize into real tangible numbers.

I would finalize this by saying that China's power projection in 2022 was enough imo, after Pelosi's visit, probably why more countries around the world got confidence in China like Saudi Arabia.
Again, numbers.

However now, due all the newfound developments and moves made by the US side, since then for 2023 and beyond, China must also increase its response levels to match US provocation levels if it wants to keep its image around.
Okey, numbers.
 

luminary

Senior Member
Registered Member
IQ drops for all age groups and both genders? That's really weird, is there something systematically affecting the population?

IQ scores in US dropped for the first time in nearly a century​

Over the past several years, multiple studies have shown that IQ scores are dropping in many European countries. And now, that appears to be the case with the U.S. as well.
1679275386339.png

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
They found that IQ scores have dropped for all age groups, regardless of gender. They also found that the steepest declines were among young people. They also noted that while a few skills, such as spatial reasoning, were better than previous generations, other skills, such as problem solving, numerical series assessments and verbal reasoning, had all grown worse.
 

9dashline

Captain
Registered Member
IQ drops for all age groups and both genders? That's really weird, is there something systematically affecting the population?

IQ scores in US dropped for the first time in nearly a century​

Over the past several years, multiple studies have shown that IQ scores are dropping in many European countries. And now, that appears to be the case with the U.S. as well.
View attachment 109455

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
They found that IQ scores have dropped for all age groups, regardless of gender. They also found that the steepest declines were among young people. They also noted that while a few skills, such as spatial reasoning, were better than previous generations, other skills, such as problem solving, numerical series assessments and verbal reasoning, had all grown worse.
the mRNA vax
 

siegecrossbow

Field Marshall
Staff member
Super Moderator
IQ drops for all age groups and both genders? That's really weird, is there something systematically affecting the population?

IQ scores in US dropped for the first time in nearly a century​

Over the past several years, multiple studies have shown that IQ scores are dropping in many European countries. And now, that appears to be the case with the U.S. as well.
View attachment 109455

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
They found that IQ scores have dropped for all age groups, regardless of gender. They also found that the steepest declines were among young people. They also noted that while a few skills, such as spatial reasoning, were better than previous generations, other skills, such as problem solving, numerical series assessments and verbal reasoning, had all grown worse.

Not enough Chinese people coming.
 

Chevalier

Major
Registered Member
It won't be the first time a regime has tried to erase Chinese identity, and it won't turn out anymore successful than the previous attempts.

Look at HK. The only thing that it took to start counter indoctrination is to pass the NSL. The moment Taiwan reunifies, their entire education system will get overhauled.
For this reason, I’m in favour of Chinese military intervention when genocide against Chinese happens. Measured of course, death squads and pogroms against Chinese should be answered with Chinese specops.

i honestly think Lithuania is no longer a real country and merely a colonial appendage of whichever hegemon it wants to tie its leash to. Such a tragedy from the pagan defenders of Vytautas and Gediminas.
So move now while China is still behind the US in nuclear bombers, carriers and submarines and the rest of NATO is too tired to help to US or move later when China is ahead in all fields and the rest of NATO is too scared to help the US? Should be an easy choice if we forgo the, "Aaaahhhhhh it's too embarrassing! I can't take it anymore!!"
Indeed, China hasn’t forgotten things like the American attack on chinas Belgrade embassy- and after President Xi naming the United States, it’s unlikely China will let things slide, no matter how many “it was just a prank bro“ articles the NYT writes.
That will never happen.

Chinese society has always been elitist.

The upper class, has always been open to the masses, if they pass the imperial examination. Today, it is a similar system in the sense the CCP has an exam, to find the best and brightest.

Crude propaganda is not something anyone is interested in.

David Goldman of AsiaTimes.com newspapers said it best, when he said that after all that training, exam taking, and hands on work, the party official gets promoted and finally gets to met an American politician or diplomat. The Chinese cadre is shocked, because this is the dumbest person he ever met in his entire life.
That Was exactly the reaction when the Chinese trade delegation met trump‘s team which included Peter Navarro and Wilbur Ross.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
Top