No. SVB assets to deposits ratio was about 1. So their assets can cover their deposits.97% of depositors have accounts at SVB exceeding 250k by very significant quantities. You don't run a startup without operating cash in the millions. So the haircuts will be massive.
The problem is that it will take time to convert these assets to hard cash. And that's what's the problem here. While the regulators try and sell all these assets, all these startup companies need access to their money now (not a year/s later), otherwise they will have to close shop or go to fundraise from their investors again..
So as I said, everyone will get back their money with a 10-15% haircut, eventually... Now how long this will take, months, years. Who knows.
Ideally, from the regulators's perspective it would be best if a much bigger bank just outright bought SVB on the cheap and then immediately honoured the SVB deposits. However looking at the past, negative, example of Wells Fargo, no bank is ain't going to do it unless the regulators sign up on some solid guarantees.


