Miscellaneous News

alfreddango

Junior Member
Registered Member
Many digital wallet today such as wechat pay or ali pay are merely a digital interface to draw your debt card or credit card. They are not digital money at all. They work as if you manually drawing your plastic card on a cash machine.

e-RMB on the other hand is equal to paper money in your wallet or numbers in your bank account. You can have all your money in e-RMB form in your phone without a bank account. This is true digital money.


"state sanctioned bitcoin" is a close analog. To be more precise, e-RMB is state issued money based on block-chain technology. Block-chain is like the paper medium.

e-RMB uses block chain tech (or variant) same as bitcoin. But e-RMB is issued by the central bank just like its paper counter part. Bitcoin is not, there is no legal entity guaranteeing its value. So on technology level e-RMB and Bitcoin work the same way. But they are fundamentally different things.

Since e-RMB is just digital form of its paper counter part, both you and the baozi shop could, would and should treat it as normal RMB. For bitcoin, nobody is obligated to use it, nor is anybody to guarantee that your bitcoin is accepted anywhere. Your bitcoin wealth can vaporize in a second.

I know nothing of traceability of e-RMB. But since the underline technology is similar, I'd say yes.
very informative, thank you very much
 

coolgod

Brigadier
Registered Member
This photo was from 2018 G20 in Argentina
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
From the lack of announcements, it looks like the Xi-Modi meeting didn't happen.
Is Saudi even dialogue partner of SCO?. but logically why will he show up.
There is hierarchy in religion and race. for this to succeed for there interests (supermacy) they want a united west with leader like Trump that can deliver. This Ukraine war is creating united west and with enhance importance of Arabs while dumping every one else like Turkey towards economic crises and tech denials. Putin is doing all he can to associate every one with SCO. so every one becomes in same boat.
MBS was invited to the summit, why he didn't show up is the question.
 

daifo

Major
Registered Member
I was wrong, I made sympathetic statements about majority of people mourning may have just been royal fans but it seems that the hong kong population is just really brainwashed. Many of these people they interviewed in this article works in education! Hong Kongers never had a chanced, no wonder the society is cucked.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

el pueblo unido

Junior Member
Registered Member
very informative, thank you very much
One thing I will have to point out is that the digital yuan apply centralized blockchain technology instead of the decentralized blockchain that cryptocurrency applies, as the blockchain consists of growing lists from a record or queue where every node on this record/queue is interlinked via very secure encryption, and each node contains a hash value of the previous one and some other important properties which make spoofing this entire process almost impossible, and a centralized version just means, unlike bitcoins, every penny spent can be traced, and unlike the current WeChat pay or Alipay, digital yuan can be viewed as real paper tokens that are stored in your phone, and due to blockchain's unique feature you can even make payment without internet connection via NFC, for average Chinese citizen digital yuan is more convenient than Alipay, more secure, and in the grand scheme of things, well, many implementations can be applied to suit the national strategy.
 

Tse

Junior Member
Registered Member
Especially one that is spearheaded by the west since it is almost always done with the purpose of subverting the nation. Until christrianity is changed back to its routes and is purified of all political intent, it’s better for China’s safety that such movement is monitored if not outright curtailed, like every other religion that have similar intent ( although admittedly unlikely given americas religion preferences)
I'm sorry but this whole line of argument in the thread is becoming strange.
1. (someone mentioned this point) Nestorian Church of the East is not extinct. It still exists in Iraq, Syria and has small groups in India. They will find it very funny if someone thinks they are Westernised

2. Religious politics are very diverse, it doesn't ever work out the way the original proponent developed it. The Russians and Ukrainians had the same Rus Orthodox Church, with the same religious leaders, for 1000 years, but did it help to keep them together? In Syria, the local Christians overwhelmingly backed Assad, and the US chose to back the Sunni terrorists. In Bosnia and Kosovo they also backed Muslims in war against Orthodox serbs and to a smaller degree Catholic Croats. In Latin America, a very large number of Catholic bishops and priests follow in whole or in part Liberation Theology, which is based on Marxism, and strongly support the socialist revolution movements. The Vatican can't stop them, the right wing military governments couldn't crush them. That's why in Latin America, the majority of Neoliberal supporters like Bolsonaro's followers are Protestant, not Catholic. Meanwhile in Eastern Europe, the Vatican practiced Ostpolitik, to accomodate to Soviet conditions about clerics. Then what happens? the Archbishop in Poland Karol Wojtyla went to defy the Pope and continue ordaining priests, eventually work with the CIA, and then he got elected as Pope John Paul II - and purely by accident because his predecessor suddenly died after being elected. Christianity in SK, Taiwan and HK are pro American because ALL the educational institutions (religious or not) in those places were subsidised by the US for decades. But the current Pope blamed NATO for provoking the Ukraine War.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
The US regime has learnt to exploit diversity while no one else has (or wants to) develop these techniques, and that is part of why they are so dangerous.

3. (somebody else mentioned) Why would christianity be any more foreign than the "Arab religion" Islam, or the "Indian religion" Buddhism? China even had a form of Confucianised Christianity under Matteo Ricci in the 1600s in the Ming dynasty, before the Chinese Rites Controversy. There are a lot of options to redirect people's interests and hobbies, without pushing them into rebellion!
 

In4ser

Junior Member
Jesus was Middle Eastern not European and Buddha was Nepalese not Chinese. The power of religion is that unites people not out of inherent characteristics but by choice to believe. That’s the limitations of China because the Chinese dream is only applicable to China and not to the rest of the world. I’m not saying China needs to become religious but it needs a vision to unite the world behind it. Maybe it should try a secular plan such as achieving moon colonization or ending global warming or achieving type I civilization.
 

Abominable

Major
Registered Member
I'm sorry but this whole line of argument in the thread is becoming strange.
1. (someone mentioned this point) Nestorian Church of the East is not extinct. It still exists in Iraq, Syria and has small groups in India. They will find it very funny if someone thinks they are Westernised
What was known as the Nestorianism in China has been extinct for several centuries. It also went extinct in India too. All Christians in India today date from the British colonial period, despite what they claim.
3. (somebody else mentioned) Why would christianity be any more foreign than the "Arab religion" Islam, or the "Indian religion" Buddhism? China even had a form of Confucianised Christianity under Matteo Ricci in the 1600s in the Ming dynasty, before the Chinese Rites Controversy. There are a lot of options to redirect people's interests and hobbies, without pushing them into rebellion!
Good point. It is very similar to Islam spreading in China (at least the Al-Qaeda form). China has spend the last 20 years countering radical Islam, why should Christianity be treated any differently? Second Islam isn't an organised religion like Christianity. Mosques follow state mandated policy. Churches won't, they'll forever be subservient to the parent church which is based in Europe or America.

Moreover China doesn't have any Islamic nations as enemies. Saudi Arabia, the homeland of Islam has very good relations with China. It does have "christian" nations as enemies Again, I refer to the example of South Korea, or more specifically South Vietnam for how the west uses Christianity to undermine nations.

Buddhism isn't Indian, that is a misconception. It is Nepalese/Tibetan and it's history is intertwinned with territories under the control of China. Not the same.

I'm not against individuals practicing whatever they wish to believe, but there should certainly be restrictions against any non government organised form. No foreign funded churches, and absolutely no foreign missionaries. And that's coming someone who was raised in the Anglican tradition.
 
Top