Europeans and robbing others, name a more iconic duo.France Robber
View attachment 96193
Europeans and robbing others, name a more iconic duo.France Robber
View attachment 96193
Woah, that are a surprising amount of clear eyed people in the comments of that video not accepting the narrative.How China wages an unseen war for strategic influence | FT
Whether through security deals with the Solomon Islands or seeking to control the Chinese diaspora in Australia, Beijing puts huge resources into trying to influence how other countries view China. The FT's global China editor James Kynge talks to John Lee, fellow at the Hudson Institute and former national security adviser to the Australian government, about how China seeks to influence elites and create division in society in order to further its foreign policy goals.
Disclaimer:
1) Financial Times is a Anglo-Japanese propaganda and misinformation outlet that follows the US' neocon/neolib narrative.
2) Hudson Institute is an American neocon/neolib (far-right) think tank that often peddles US neocon/neolib propaganda and misinformation.
Breaking news:
German opposition party AFD will organizing a demonstration in Berlin on Oct. 8. At present, ten thousand people have responded on Internet.
HONG KONG -- China and the U.S. have signed an audit oversight agreement, China's top securities regulator announced Friday, paving the way for further cooperation on an impasse that has threatened Chinese shares with delisting.
Under the agreement, the U.S. will have to obtain Chinese companies' audit records through Chinese regulatory authorities and conduct interviews or inquiries with the auditors involving Chinese authorities, CSRC said in a statement.
I'm not sure if this is a good or a bad thing, but I imagine in a few months or so the US side will accuse Chinese authorities for giving partial or fake audit records lol."On paper, the agreement signed today grants the PCAOB complete access to the audit work papers, audit personnel, and other information we need to inspect and investigate any firm we choose, with no loopholes and no exceptions," PCAOB Chair Erica Williams said in a statement. "But the real test will be whether the words agreed to on paper translate into complete access in practice."
I'm not sure if this is a good or a bad thing, but I imagine in a few months or so the US side will accuse Chinese authorities for giving partial or fake audit records lol.
Under the agreement, the U.S. will have to obtain Chinese companies' audit records through Chinese regulatory authorities and conduct interviews or inquiries with the auditors involving Chinese authorities, CSRC said in a statement.
In a statement, the PCAOB said the agreement would allow it "sole discretion to select the firms, audit engagements and potential violations it inspects and investigates – without consultation with, nor input from, Chinese authorities."
Is it possible that they're just trying to bury the issue with nothing agreed upon to score political points for Biden before the midterms, but they will bring this issue up again on later date when its convenient to demonize China again?What is confusing is that the CSRC is saying one thing and the US is saying the exact opposite.
Maybe CSRC don't want to tell what concessions they give. Seems CN concessions are major, unfettered access without redactions.What is confusing is that the CSRC is saying one thing and the US is saying the exact opposite.