Miscellaneous News

FriedButter

Brigadier
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

China’s air becomes cleaner now, as carbon dioxide emissions per unit of GDP fall by half from 2005

hina, as the world’s largest developing country, has made great achievements in carbon reduction during the past decade, cutting its carbon emissions per unit of GDP by half from 2005 levels.

Despite intensifying challenges ahead, the direction of reducing carbon emissions will not be changed and China retains huge potential in developing new energy resources, experts said on Saturday.

In 2021, the national carbon dioxide emissions per unit of GDP fell by 3.8 percent year-on-year, approximately 50.3 percent lower than 2005 levels. The total energy consumption sourced from coal dropped from 72.4 percent in 2005 to 56 percent in 2021, according to Zhao Yingming, vice minister of the Ministry of Ecology and Environment.

Non-fossil fuel energy now stands at 16.6 percent of the country’s total energy consumption in 2021, Zhao said.

The installed capacity of renewable energy reached 1.06 billion kilowatts, accounting for 44.8 percent of the country’s total energy output. Among the renewable energy, the installed capacity of wind power and photovoltaic power both exceeded 300 million kilowatt-hours, ranking the first globally.

As a result, the amount of harmful particulates in the air in China fell 40 percent from 2013 to 2020, Bloomberg reported, citing a research by the University of Chicago’s Energy Policy Institute.

The improvement of air quality in China’s large cities has been notable. In 2021, the number of blue-sky days in Beijing came in at 288 days, or 78.9 percent of the calendar year, up by112 days from 2013.

As the world’s largest developing country, China has realized a rapid drop in carbon intensity – carbon dioxide emissions per unit of GDP – over recent years, and has fulfilled its commitment to the international community, Ma Jun, director of the Beijing-based Institute of Public and Environmental Affairs, told the Global Times on Saturday.

China has vowed to reach peak carbon dioxide emissions by 2030 and achieve carbon neutrality by 2060, referred to as the country’s “dual carbon” goals. “Carbon intensity will continue to decrease in the coming months and years,” Ma said.

In the meantime, realizing the “dual carbon” goal will not be simple and easy, especially when the world is facing multiple challenges, including the COVID-19 pandemic, the Russia-Ukraine conflict and the intensifying energy supply crisis, according to Ma.

In recent years, many countries in the world have stepped up efforts to ensure energy security, including China. Energy is the foundation of economic and social development. Fulfilling the premise of ensuring safe, clean and efficient utilization, China moved to release high-quality coal production capacity.

Despite the adjustment, the trend of overall carbon reduction will not change, Ma said, noting that China retains a huge potential when it comes to developing new energy resources.

The exploitable capacity of hydropower technology in China is estimated to be 687 million kilowatt-hours, of which only 57.1 percent is developed.

Chinese governments at various levels have been implementing measures to boost new energy development, and many businesses have also been eyeing the lucrative new energy business.

For an example, The government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (HKSAR) has stated its intention to invest an additional HK$240 billion to tackle climate change over the next 15 to 20 years, which will create opportunities for a green economy in many sectors, Christopher Hui Ching-yu, the Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury of HKSAR, said Friday.

Ma added that besides increasing investments in new energy resources, it is also important to improve energy efficiency, especially relating to the industrial sector, and to shore up the storage technology for new energy and enhance the construction of a nationwide intelligent grid.
 

coolgod

Brigadier
Registered Member
China should open the reservoir right as the flooding is at its worst lol. Whoops, just had to dump a little more water on ya
My post was referring to the giant hydroelectric dam China wanted to build on the Yarlung Zangbo, which is the upper stream of the Brahmaputra River, the one that often gets flooded during the rainy season.

But India always complains and makes fake news about how this is close to border conflict and China will steal water or something, Jai Hind. This is one of the reasons why that giant dam has been delayed for a while.

The standards of living and unnecessary loss of life in India can be attributed to India's pettiness over China's hydroelectical power generation capabilities. I just feel bad for the Bangladeshi who are further downstream and have to suffer too.

Does China pump extra water held by dams to reservoirs in other parts of the country during flood season?
Probably not for this river, other rivers some water diversion is probably possible.
 

Overbom

Brigadier
Registered Member
The standards of living and unnecessary loss of life in India can be attributed to India's pettiness over China's hydroelectical power generation capabilities. I just feel bad for the Bangladeshi who are further downstream and have to suffer too.
If Bangladesh wishes so China can definetely save that country from climate change. I have 0 doubt that China's engineering prowess is unmatched in the world. If there is one country that can do something so ambitious, it is China.

However, unfortunately it seems that Bangladesh is infiltrated with too much Indian influence which limits how much it can cooperate with China.

In any case, its their loss (both India + Bangladesh). If climate change is hitting them so hard in 2022, then by 2040 it will be apocalyptic for them. China got nothing to lose, its shop is open for business. Whoever wants to can sign a deal and China can deploy the necessary resources available to it to help them.
 

Overbom

Brigadier
Registered Member
A terrific piece from the respected Russian think tank, Valdai Club:

TLDR: Russia's rebellion and the West's rush to contain it before it spreads further
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
In the ideological sphere, it is increasingly presented as a struggle between the liberal world order and the “rebellion of the discontented”. It is Russia that today has assumed the role of the vanguard of such a rebellion, openly challenging its Western rivals.
Given the concentration of Russian discontent in the political sphere, it is hardly surprising that it was the Ukrainian issue that became the trigger for the “Russian rebellion”. The Maidans and the change of power were seen by Moscow as a cynical hack into the country's political system, as well as a threat of such a hack targeting Russia itself.
In addition, at the doctrinal level, Ukraine was increasingly positioned as a fundamentally different project, drifting further and further towards Western values. From the point of view of foreign policy, it was with regards to the Ukrainian issue that Russian interests in the field of security were discriminated against in the most acute form.
Realising that the game was being played according to fundamentally unfavourable and discriminatory rules from the Russian point of view, Moscow not only slammed the table with its fist and brushed the pieces off the board, it also decided, figuratively speaking, to hit its opponents hard on the head with this board. Rivalry "according to the rules" turned into a fight, the field of which is Ukraine.
At the same time, on the part of the West itself, there is a degree of irritation, discontent and rejection of Russia, proportional to its own discontent or even surpassing it. The West is frustrated by the very fact of a decisive rebellion, its senselessness in terms of the balance of benefits and losses, and the ruthlessness of Russian pressure.


The West has every reason to fear the "Russian rebellion." Worries about a liberal world order arose long before 2022 and even before 2014. Compared to Russia, China poses a far greater danger. If the "Russian rebellion" is successful, it will become clear that China's ambitions will be even more difficult to contain. Moreover, unlike Russia, China can offer an alternative economic model, and its own view of democracy, as well as a different ethic of international relations.
 

baykalov

Senior Member
Registered Member
Germany is asking Canada to violate sanctions and return the repaired Siemens turbines to Gazprom.

OTTAWA, June 16 (Reuters) - Canada said on Thursday it was in talks with Germany to resolve an issue with a Siemens Energy turbine for Russia's Nord Stream 1 pipeline that was sent to Canada for maintenance, reducing gas supply to Europe.

The capacity of Gazprom's Nord Stream 1 pipeline to supply gas to Europe is partly constrained as sanctions on Russia make it impossible for German equipment supplier Siemens to return the turbine being maintained in Canada, the companies said earlier this week.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
Top