asif iqbal
Banned Idiot
Exactly. In the years since the 2020 Nagorno-Karabakh war. Russian media have been constantly boasting about measures to deal with the famous TB-2 Bayraktars. They have said that they have: Pantsirs, Anti-drone radars, Tunguskas, and AAM-armed Orion drones. They have demonstrated these things in their testing range. Well, where are they now?
How did Russia destroyed those Ukrainian air bases? I think they did a terrible job. Instead of just popping some buildings. They should have been scattering cluster munitions onto the runways. That's what NATO would have done. They should have put those airbases out of commission for weeks, not just 3 days.
When Russia intervened in Syria, they flooded the social media and news channels with countless UAV videos showing the targeting and destruction of enemy forces. Now, in the most important war that Russia is fighting in 20 years, we have seen nothing of such sort. Everything we see from the Russian side are either announcements, or videos taken on the ground by journalists or spectators. Its like as if Russia is trying to lose the information war. This better be worth the price the Russians are paying with blood for each emboldened Ukrainian killing more Russians.
To be fair, the Russians have achieve near air superiority, albeit a porous one. Ukrainian helicopters and jets have largely been silenced. We don't hear about them anymore. But the Bayraktars are still out there, scouting and killing Russian troops. Why haven't the Russians seriously dealt with them? They have claimed to have the solutions. Its quite baffling.
I have observed countries who have used Russian military equipment and doctrine in conflicts. All of them have major issues with regards to air combat. Syria vs Israel, Armenia vs Azerbaijan, and India vs Pakistan. Fortunately China have been observant and have been adopting NATO war fighting concepts. For example, a greater emphasis on BVR combat than WVR combat for newer PLAAF aircrafts.
Ukraine probably might have a few dozen Bayraktars at the start of this war. With a number of them being destroyed on the ground and in the air, it is likely that their stocks would be dwindling soon. Russia destroying fuel and ammunition depots should accelerate their exit from this war. Its only a matter of time before the Bayraktars too would be silenced.
I would agree
but why Russia is doing a half done job baffles me, its not like they dont know how to fight
I mean if anything Russia is one of the most advanced nations when fighting on land traditionally its always been a land army nation with extensive capabilities to move large armies to combat theatres far away ON LAND
I would expect mistakes from the Russian Navy but not the Army and Air Force
the Russian AF did not take out the Ukrainian Air Defences at airport adjacent to Kiev and as a result the IL76 did not do the para drop and as a result of that they never secured the airport which means they cannot get the troops to in to push to the City Centre
those Helicopter Airborne Troops did not do enough and they didnt hunt down the Ukrainian Air Defence and never neutralised the short SAM systems in and around airport, why? Ukrainians weren't even fighting hard then
Short trip to centre of Kiev by armoured column would have put whole operation into Russian hands when they install a puppet government, I mean they have done this many times in many other examples Russian are experts in this kind of warfare
and its not like they didnt have time to plan, they had all the time in the World and yet we are seeing fuel shortages and abandoned Russian heavy armour who have outrun their supplies lines, really? Russian Army outrunning supplies lines, never
Russian armour getting bogged down, never they have built their system so it doesnt bog down due to vast types of Russian geography and multiple purpose Russian vehicles
its a disaster from the start