Miscellaneous News

BrightFuture

New Member
Registered Member
Contrast that with the completely understandable and predictable response from the EU and other NATO countries that hijacking a plane en route from one EU city to another is unacceptable.
I can see that you have a shot term, or selective memory. In 2013 Evo’s plane was landed in Austria in a similar fashion, because the US suspected Edward Snowden could be on board. In 2016 Ukraine diverted a Belarusian plane under a threat of scrambling jets and without explaining any reasons for why the plane was being diverted. No international outrage in those two cases, of course. There are more examples like that, but we all know the western double standards. You won't condemn or care those other cases, but of course when some country against Western supremacy does the same, you are the first one to show your worthless and performative s*** opinion. I can't stand hypocrites...
 

Gatekeeper

Brigadier
Registered Member
understandable and predictable response from the EU and other NATO countries that hijacking a plane en route from one EU city to another is unacceptable.

Evo Morales grounding incident​


Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


@foofy Great memory. I forgot about that, together with the hijacking on the high sea of Yinhe.

And now the western governments and their agencies AKA MSM is getting high and right, just and morale on this with their condemnation and as T had put it as quoted above shows the height of western hyprocrisy.

Edit.

@BrightFuture

I see you beat me to it. The western hypocrisy is too much. It's like the likes of our friend here and western MSM always harping on about the rule of law, the law of the sea etc. Yet the biggest country still haven't accepted the law of the sea is the......... wait for it....... U.S. Yet, that doesn't stop these people on this forum alone in the past argued that US still has that right because they "abide" by the rules and haven't done "anything" against the law of the sea otherwise! That's the hypocrisy and logic of the jungle China is up against.

But I guess we can't be too hard on him. He can't help the way he is, and is he good that he post such nonsense. It reminds us the hypocrisy from the west still exists.

Still well said, and needed to be said.
 
Last edited:

windsclouds2030

Senior Member
Registered Member
The minute the Chinese people turn on their ruling class is the minute the Pentagon pops open all of the champagne because that is the death of China's rise. The romance of a people equal to each other without leadership or an outstanding rich elite is a defunct utopian fantasy that always ends in disaster, for the only countries that have no rich are those where every one is poor and destitute. The most common contribution that a Chinese person can make to China is to fight and struggle as hard as he can to try to join the rich elite because regardless of his success or failure, that is the best way for the Chinese system to harness his energy for national growth. If he takes the ruling class and the rich elite as his enemies and acts against them, he acts as a dog of the West and will end up incarcerated for his crimes against the nation. The ruling elite with their companies and their national plans are the spear-tip of any nation's rise and the people are the force driving that spear. If they work together, the spear thrusts forward to advance the nation and defeat its adversaries; if they fight against each other, both will become useless nonsense. And if they are defeated, those who were victorious over them will declare themselves a superior race over them; racism is decided by the winners, not the losers, and while the way to be a winner is complicated and difficult, a clear way to be a loser is to embrace traditional socialism and overthrow the smartest people in the country who know what they're doing just because their knowledge and innovative capacity makes them rich.

The Chinese people would be mistaken to concern themselves with any greater global good of whether some yellow or white tyrant or fair ruler, whatever is better; we just need to know that no matter what, for us Chinese, China on top is best.
Only the greatly fooled Chinese ever believe that millions of different ideas even thousands or simply hundreds of different ideas or thoughts contested in open are serving any good for the nation!!!

The current Chinese system is the best whereas competing ideas are considered and argued within the intern of the party, not being fought in the public in the wild. Majority of population have no capability to lead let alone to rule. To be good leaders need lots of talents and wisdoms, and only few selected people have such quality! Just cannot imagine the over 1400 million people have many political parties then fight each other like in many parts of the world incl. in the wealthy West.

India is the best example on how far a population over one billion (nearly 1400 million in more precise) may go in the situation of many political parties.... I have no envy at all to such Indian political system. Other large population (above 250 million) adopting the many political parties are the USA itself, fortunate with its WRC money printers thus can print continuously to give free allowances to millions of Americans each month, and Indonesia which is not in good conditions. Other relatively large populations that adopt the many political parties and remain wealthy are mainly the old Europeans plus Japan, but still each has population less than 100 million people except Japan (130 million) and Russia with vast landmass and natural resources (146 million). The remaining wealthy nations are having population in term of tens of millions or even less.

Look carefully at these population list.

Top 20 Largest Countries By Population.png

Population Comparison - China, EU, USA, and Japan.png

Subregions in Europe by population (2021).png


LIST OF COUNTRIES HAVING POPULATION MORE THAN 20 MILLION PEOPLE

Countries with Population Above 20 Million People part-1.png



Countries with Population Above 20 Million People part-2.png

Note: Those countries being highlighted in yellow color are regarded as wealthy.


Basically for Chinese people the discussion about the alternative political system beyond the one-party CPC has no merit at all. Even for myself who is not a PRC subject does recognize the existence of Communist Party of China (CPC) is truly a miracle for the nation, building country from ashes, from the very bottom position, achieving such stellar results within such short period, attaining the progress of no precedence in human civilization

I won't give a thought at all about changing the current political system in China, on how the country is ruled.

But we may discuss again this subject next 50 years... :) But I think in next several decades China only need to change the name of the political system, consider something like the Celestial Confucius Governing System, or simply Chinese Political System (thus Chinese Party) etc :) I care more about its efficiency and output than the mere name!

But frankly I NEVER BELIEVE the many political parties are good idea for a population of THAT many (more than 300 million is already tough to govern let alone exceed 1000 million people!)

One party adopting the MERITOCRACY recruiting the best talents of nation with hearts sharing the same ideals and dreams while keeps on rejuvenating itself is the best governance system for the nation of China (and each leader must be patriotic!!!). Of course, no place in any leading position for those "han jian" 汉奸〔漢奸〕however smart they are!! Each Chinese leader must preserve the Chinese way of life and Chinese characteristics! That's the essence of the nation in addition to prosperity, harmony, unity and strength!



Watch this presentation in Scotland, explaining Chinese Meritocracy system vs the Corpotocracy

Eric X. Li: A tale of two political systems :: with embedded Bilingual subtitles English & Chinese

 
Last edited:

ougoah

Brigadier
Registered Member
LOL at Mr. T championing false morality and then quickly educated. I'm not one to judge whether those actions were justified. At least, they are not without precedent. Western powers always set it and quickly forget their own ill gotten gains before accusing others of everything in their imagination.
 

siegecrossbow

General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

According to this fellow, daniel yergin, vice chairman of IHS Markit, the us is looking to peel russia away from China
Me thinks they have absolutely no chance, they are delusional is they think they can woo russia away from China by waiving one single sanction any softening towards russia by biden admin will be pounced hard by the republicans
There is no way the us can match China russia cooperation in all areas
At this point China is much more valuable to russia the us

Did the Congress actually approve of dropping the sanctions against Russia? Will Biden need an executive order to drop the Nordstrom’s sanctions after apologizing to Putin for calling him a cold blooded killer?
 

NiuBiDaRen

Brigadier
Registered Member
LOL at Mr. T championing false morality and then quickly educated. I'm not one to judge whether those actions were justified. At least, they are not without precedent. Western powers always set it and quickly forget their own ill gotten gains before accusing others of everything in their imagination.
LOL is Mr T Dubya?

Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, you can't be fooled again!
 
Top