Just like the tulip mania in 1600s did make some people rich from the speculation if they timed it right, but the tulip wasnt worth a house and it never increased net wealth of society, just shuffled and redistributed money around from the late bag holders transferred to early adopters before the whole pyramid scheme imploded
Sure you could have individually benefitted if you played cards right, but only at the expense of another sucker that propped you up when you sold out...
In all pyramids the bottom rung is by far the largest.. the net effect is most people who hold bitcoin are going to be left holding the fake virtual bag as real resources are devied up by the elites who get to convert their dollars to real assets like silver, gold, land on the cheap whilsts joe six pack and the common sheeple is holding the scamcoins thinking they have become (paper) millionaires
Back in 2013 I knew a coworker who was kicking himself for selling 50 bitcoins at 50 usd each, by then it climbed to 1500 usd... he definetly would have sold it all at 1500 if he still had them, then he would kick himself again in 2017 when it peaked at 17000 and again today at 60000...
Its the mind playing tricks on you, you only see what you missed just like if you can only guess correctly two more numbers you would win power lottery etc but its still rigged against the average person
Bitcoin is a redistribution of existing wealth not a creation nor storage of additional wealth
By mathematical definition, the majority of people whom participate in a pyramid scheme will not be able to benefit from it
Those real assets you're talking about, are only real assets because people believe/believed they are real assets. Gold and silver are valuable because they are rare, they took a lot of effort/labor to mine, purify, smelt and mint. Same with bitcoin the flow of new bitcoin becomes more rare over time reaching a max at around 21 million bitcoins. To mine bitcoin takes a lot of effort/labor, you need to design faster/more efficient ASICS, design better data centers and decrease cooling costs etc. You need some top level engineers. So a bitcoin also represent a certain amount of effort/labor.
The thing with Gold and Silver is that it will go to zero once space mining becomes a thing, that might be late this century or somewhere in the early 2200s. Just look up Asteroid 16 psyche aka the gold asteroid. The thing about bitcoin is your really can't out tech the 21 million limit on bitcoin, even suggesting to removing the cap will unleash a new crypto civil war, like the block size wars from some years ago. Where groups within bitcoin community forked bitcoin and built their own currencies that kind of failed later on.
You now also have multiple generation that don't really give a sh!t about gold and silver locked up in some dusty old vault, that also grew up as digital citizens that see digital items the same as real physical items. I know because when I was a teen/early twenties I also spend multiple times 5~10 euros on stupid outfits in online games. This same generation is also told that renting things is cheaper and more convenient then buying.
For millennials and younger generation bitcoin has the same narrative as gold and silver had for previous generations, but the features are so much better then gold and silver. You don't need an expensive/heavy ass vault, don't have to pay to transfer physical gold from location A to location B. You don't have to be afraid as a country that the US or UK can confiscate your gold like they did with Venezuela. You don't have to push gold bars into your anus just to smuggle it out of a country(india).
Where I do agree with is that bitcoin will create a class of people that will benefit greatly from the cantillon effect, because they were early and are now way up there in the pyramid. For many it doesn't really matter if Satoshi Nakamoto is a real person, a group of persons or the CIA. Because gold and silver bars/coins are also just products made by governmental institutions but only 5000 years in the past.
An interesting view on money and debt is the book of the late writer David Graeber called "Debt: The first 5000 years" in the later chapters it describes how societies usually switch back and forth between hard currencies like gold, silver and bitcoin(today) and virtual currencies like fiat money. This switch is usually initiated by the elites or opinion makers(influencers) of a society and the normal people are usually late to the party.