There is no agreed LAC to begin with just like the boarder. If soldier from one side stand on a spot, that spot becomes part of LAC of that side. Tomorrow if soldier from the other side stand on the same spot, it becomes part of LAC of the other side.I am not a geography student , so i would like to ask.
The map showed in the video, says the entire thing went on around finger 4 area.
So if india "intruded" in Chinese side of LAC, that means Chinese side of LAC starts right from Finer four by Indian admission.
Is that correct?
A really meaningful line is something that both sides agree upon and marked on maps and exchanged for future reference. So far there is nothing like it. LAC does NOT have any legal meaning in anyway unlike line drawn by a cease-fire agreement or treaty.
The reason that the India side repeatedly use the word LAC is a play to give itself some sort of "legitimacy" that China "violated something".
There is really no point to argue who intrude whom, just talk with fist, stick or gun.