Mk1’s failure is not my determination, but rather the Indian armed forces assessment by not procuring it further. Like they don’t even feel it can credibly replace a MiG-21 as is? It’s not a glowing endorsement.
Well, because it's true. At a face value, Tejas mk1 has better(but not crucially) radar, ~similar intercept profile.
Mk1 doesn't get EL/L-8222 and twin ASRAAM(in fact it doesn't get ASRAAM at all apparently), so it's effectively similar or even weaker armament(i-derby v rvv-ae) and less protection (though with modern RWR).
But it is not the same as development failure, as old warhorse is obviously just more reliable and better understood.
All planes early on in their career are bitch to work with. But you can make tejas mk1a out of tejas mk1. Mig-21bis was really on its last legs.
I’m not saying it’s a total failure, but without certainty on the engines, the program is effectively at a dead end. Put those resources into AMCA instead, or create a face-saving “Mk3” (in reality a new plane) based around M88 or something. Also (I know this is impossible), but restrain against demanding too much for the engine like full and complete tech transfer and the keys to Versailles Palace.
Tejas mk1 is a live plane, which can be used operationally; at least, when you have engines(1a). Tejas MK2 is a 2030s plane; it's a new plane, sure, but at least it's a Tejas. I.e. it is low risk.
AMCA is a 2040s high risk dream. And speaking flatly, french
never share core know-how, i.e. if indians will believe this - idk, they should check allegiance (and visa) of their negotiators.
I think a more relevant lesson is not that of J-8II, but of the cancelled J-9. An overly ambitious design for the industrial capability of China of that time, so it was cancelled. You could also say the same about Super-7 vs. JF-17.
I disagree. Tejas has 1 operational squadron, and Tejas mk1a are now ultimately restricted by engines; i.e. otherwise, problematic development now delivered a proper fruit.
Yes, Tejas mk1 is a 3rd rate plane(mostly courtesy of it's armament and decision to skip on derby-er and overall just be done with them). But Tejas mk1a is roughly comparable with JF-17 III, only a few years later. Which is, mildly speaking, a decent plane.
Yes, Tejas 1a is flatly weaker in air superiority, but in it's core role (GCI intercept, light strike) - it's excellent.
Engine be damned, but should they solve at least indian radar, this is a solid point. Remember that for all our laughs at air forces, as a product, JF-17 is Chengdu through and thorough, with Chinese armament, radar and Russian engine. Tejas on mk1a at least got astra, and maybe second batch will get Uttam.
Industrially, it's certainly an achievement.
Operationally, Tejas will for the first time in a decade may contain the general trend of PAF gaining and gaining strength v IAF. This is significant as well.
Overall, we laugh at India for buying their way out of trouble. But that's ultimately how growing something looks like. Through persistence, pain and laughs.