PS ... and that leads to the question, what other units will now get the "old" vanilla J-20s?
That's too much, we know by early 2025 most if not all CAC production were J-20A hence it is likely J-20 production winded down sometime during 2024.With the first J-20A WS-10C2 units spotted in service colours and the first J-20A WS-15 units launching from CAC plants, what do we think is the final production total of vanilla J-20?
IIRC, the last accurate assessment we had was 350x J-20 in 2024, with an estimated annual production of 100 airframes a year. By mid-2026 when we can assume new production has shifted primarily to J-20A (still split between the last of the WS-10C2 and first WS-15 variants, and total production capacity shared with J-20S), would an estimate of ~500x J-20 be reasonable?
That's too much, we know by early 2025 most if not all CAC production were J-20A hence it is likely J-20 production winded down sometime during 2024.
500 would be reasonable for total J-20/A/S count but J-20 likely only numbers in the low 400s or high 300s.
Extrapolating from this, if 500 is reasonable for total J-20/A/S of which 400 is J-20 vanilla, then there are 100 airframes of J-20A/S.
Given how J-20A WS-15 was only spotted flying out of CAC in 2026 and its currently mid-2026, then there should have been roughly 1 year production run (2025-2026) of J-20A/S WS-10C2. So we're looking at <100 airframes (probably ~66) of J-20A/S WS-10C2.
I know these are all very speculative "back of the envelope" calculations, but it should at least give us something to work with.
Does anyone know roughly how many vanilla J-20 AF-31F (+AF-31FM2?) airframes there were? This would be the LRIP batches from ~2016 to ~2020 before the full transition to WS-10C and full-rate production happened.
These AL-31 engines were strictly an interim solution. China needed to get the initial production batches of the J-20 off the ground and into early service during the 2010s, but their domestic engine programs were lagging behind the airframe's development.Extrapolating from this, if 500 is reasonable for total J-20/A/S of which 400 is J-20 vanilla, then there are 100 airframes of J-20A/S.
Given how J-20A WS-15 was only spotted flying out of CAC in 2026 and its currently mid-2026, then there should have been roughly 1 year production run (2025-2026) of J-20A/S WS-10C2. So we're looking at <100 airframes (probably ~66) of J-20A/S WS-10C2.
I know these are all very speculative "back of the envelope" calculations, but it should at least give us something to work with.
Does anyone know roughly how many vanilla J-20 AF-31F (+AF-31FM2?) airframes there were? This would be the LRIP batches from ~2016 to ~2020 before the full transition to WS-10C and full-rate production happened.
A further question is if/when will the WS-10s on those ~400 aircraft will be replaced with WS-15 engines.
The partially used WS-10 engines can still be usefully reused by CCAs.
---
Note that a new F-135 engine (used in the F-25) costs $20 Million whilst a new F-110 engine (used by the F-15/16) costs $8 Million. The F-135 does have 52% more thrust, but I don't see the extra cost being justified for a CCA-sized aircraft and its missions.
I think WS-10 engines on J-20 won't get replaced until need replacing, not sure WS-15 can be fitted on J-20s easily
Remember that J-20 with WS-10C is already very deadly and better than most fighters (relatively on par with F-20 and arguably better than F-35) and far better than the rest of fighters in the word
The J-20s will be performing distant offensive counter-air missions, so they can benefit from the additional range/performance of the WS-15 (27%? additional thrust). With that sort of difference, they should have designed the earlier J-20s to accommodate the WS-15.
And it just makes sense to replace the WS-10s early, so they still have enough service life to be used on a CCA which doesn't need to fly very often. Using a brand-new engine on a CCA is inefficient, as the engine will have a way longer lifespan than the CCA.