There's no such thing as removal; all possible loads are being tested.They finally removed the machine gun from the drone; carrying mortar shells is a more reasonable choice.
Although I also really dislike having guns attached.
There's no such thing as removal; all possible loads are being tested.They finally removed the machine gun from the drone; carrying mortar shells is a more reasonable choice.
That makes sense.They finally removed the machine gun from the drone; carrying mortar shells is a more reasonable choice.
seems like different configs for different situations, thaat one is more useful for SWAT than army.They finally removed the machine gun from the drone; carrying mortar shells is a more reasonable choice.
i think its to make sure everyone understand what they are doing and are moving.Also the PLA still require the SL to hold the door open? No locking mechanism for the door? It just strike me as odd for a vehicle built in 2026 to be rocking 1980s style tech. But hey maybe it is reliable and and a Doctrinal thing (make the SL count out his squad, etc).
I believe you are right, as it demonstrates a procedure that is performed time after time. Suggesting not just an SOP within 'A' unit, but several units and thus more than likely the PLA Doctrine.i think its to make sure everyone understand what they are doing and are moving.
people are alot more likely to screw up/ blank out under pressure
So in the production run the IFV won't have a independent sight for commander and gunner ?More footage of the wheeled IFV in active service
Depends if they want the turret to be operated by 2 people or not i guess.So in the production run the IFV won't have a independent sight for commander and gunner ?
Interesting choice in 2026