Miscellaneous News

4Tran

Junior Member
Registered Member
I'm actually surprised this isn't talked about more.

America keeps whining about China doing this and that. Meanwhile they literally elected Indians born in India to political positions. Not to mention these guys are part of the massive Indian lobby that are doing stuff clearly in favor of their home country.

I get America being xenophobic to outsiders but at least show some damn consistency. At least India does that consistently by screwing over ALL foreign companies than enter it.
I think that it makes a lot more sense when you look at it from the lens of fear. Americans, and the West by extension, have always been suspicious and a bit fearful of Chinese people but this was largely downplayed from 1980-2010 because China wasn't seen as a threat. Sure, there'd be the odd bit of antagonism, but even at the height of the break between China and the West after 1989, there is nowhere near as much antagonism as there is now. The Third Taiwan Strait Crisis happened in 1995-1996, and nobody even remembers this event.

It's not until China was perceived to be much more of a rival in the early 2010s that this shifted. From what I recall of the period, it started with the flaring up of the Senkaku Islands dispute in 2012, quickly followed by the flare up of tensions in the South China Sea, and finally the Pivot to Asia. Up until then, China was seen as vaguely menacing, but never a real world power, much less a rival to the End of History Western hegemony.

Compare and contrast that to India, and it's hard for anyone in the West to be scared of them. People in the West simply don't see Indian products dominate their houses, and they can't see India succeeding at long term plans the way their own governments are incapable of. The US government doesn't see India as a threat, and so nobody in the West is going to care too much about them.

Another good example of this syndrome is to look at Japan. Nowadays Japan is thought of as a pet Democracy the same way the West thinks of India. But back in the '70s and '80s, Japan was seen as a rising power; as a threat to the US's power structure. And we saw a lot of anti-Japanese sentiment up until the mid-90s. But once the Japanese economy slumped, they're not a threat any more, and the negative sentiment dried up.
 

Thecore

Junior Member
Registered Member

Interesting that there's not a "pure" Korean in this discussion. It's like in Japan where you can be fully Japanese by blood but if you were born in the US, you're not a "real" Japanese to the people of Japan. They have all sorts of names for these people indicative of the class culture in Japan. It's like some Koreans find out they're really Chinese. Like with Johnny Somali's association with Hank Yoo. Koreans don't like him because of it so they claim he's Chinese as an excuse to disassociate him with Koreans. Are you really getting a true picture from some of these people when they're not actually "Korean"? This channel is coming out of South Korea, so why couldn't they find one?

There are lot of different dynamics going on so if even Southeast Asian women think they're moving up socially especially because one marries a white, why do they complain about what the Koreans looking down at "SEAblings" when it comes from the same logic? I was at someone's house where they were celebrating a man's birthday who was a high ranking diplomat of the Marcos regime in the Philippines. While there I was browsing through the books he had on the shelf and one I came across was on how glorious the Philippines was pointing out that Filipino women were one of most beautiful women of the world because of how they had European blood from race-mixing with them. But I hear how Filipinos think they don't get respect from other Asians. Isn't that the same South Korean attitude when you think they're some of the most beautiful women of the world over everyone else except maybe whites?

Nationalism is an ugly thing and Asia is rife with it. And of course you better believe that the West stirred that up because they wanted everyone hating each other except for them. That's how they have control when everyone goes to them and avoids everyone else. Ironic because all of them come from countries that hate China because of communism and yet Asian cultures are just as authoritarian as communists regardless if they're even democracies now hence why they were human-rights violating police states before they were democracies. That's why I laugh at Asian countries that bring up human rights in China when they're just as authoritarian minded as China is? It's just like the West bringing human rights in China. It's disingenuous especially since every country they colonized in the world, they never gave democracy. It's like with Hong Kong. The British didn't think the people of Hong Kong could handle democracy so they never gave it under their 156 year rule over it. But today everyone acts like China took away the democracy the British never gave. If any one ignores that fact and continue with the lie, they have no principles which is the foundation of believing you have any ounce of believing you care for others... which they don't. If anyone did, I would have respect for that person but there isn't because all of them care about "white attention" as their only motivation therefore they cannot be trusted.
Sorry but, ew, another white guy "understander" of Asia. No thanks. Had the displeasure of hearing from his kind, enough for 10 lifetimes. Skip to 52 min of this guest he had on. (more we hate the EVIL SEESEEPEE, not the people! rhetoric. "We just want the people to do exactly what we say is all!")

 
Last edited:

horse

Brigadier
Registered Member
It's why Alex's observations in Seattle are so impactful. You can character assassinate him as much as you like but no one has yet been able to offer any rebuttal to what he's saying.

dotdash-Final-K-Shaped-Recovery-Oct-2020-01-12d3712b2c654da891a77c6c7a132daa.webp



7d9a0ae9-851099.png


The K-shaped economy of present day America.

According to the history books, the social situation of the haves and the have not were kind of like this.

Also, we should note, that the present trends are still going the same way, to further entrench this situation. No surprise with a reactionary in power.

A reactionary, another term from the history books! LOL!

:p

Remember that Indian poster, who would insist and object that when someone makes a point that people live paycheque to paycheque in America?

He claimed that was no problem because of the high wages.

He was so funny, and kind of curious, because he was either really dumb or just really good at lying straight at us.

:D

Okay,, here is the rant ...

The basic point of people living paycheck to paycheck, is the money is not flowing to them. It is flowing into someone else's pocket. That makes sense.

Some struggle to make ends make, while the rich get richer.

Here is the problem, which is the next step in the analysis because that is reality.

Since the rich get richer, they start to squeeze out the ones living paycheque to paycheque.

For example, the price of a new car in America is $50,000 USD, which is a lot.

The rich can afford it, while those living paycheque to paycheque obviously cannot, they cannot even afford a new $30,000 USD car, if there was one.

This is what is known sort of like, the invisible hand, or more modern tern, market forces.

So due to market forces, those living paycheck to paycheck will continue to get squeezed. They cannot afford a new car, they cannot afford rent (because rents go up due to rich people buying up all the property then it is the same rich people goes all NIMBY with no new development, and free immigration).

The proof is in the data, or so we are told. The percentage of Americans living paycheck to paycheck continues to rise. That means they getting squeezed, squeezed towards that kill line down there.

That is why I found that Indian guy so ridiculous but interesting.

Him saying that people living paycheck to paycheck is not a problem in America, because of high wages, has a ring of truth, because there are high wages.

The glaring problem is, he thinks none of us has ever heard of market forces.

But bring that up, and he would say something else just a ridiculous, so he get banned! Haha!

Ever since they banned his ass, never came across anyone as outrageous as he was, with his constant misrepresentations of all things and everything. LOL!

:oops::D
 

_killuminati_

Captain
Registered Member
dotdash-Final-K-Shaped-Recovery-Oct-2020-01-12d3712b2c654da891a77c6c7a132daa.webp



7d9a0ae9-851099.png


The K-shaped economy of present day America.

According to the history books, the social situation of the haves and the have not were kind of like this.

Also, we should note, that the present trends are still going the same way, to further entrench this situation. No surprise with a reactionary in power.

A reactionary, another term from the history books! LOL!

:p

Remember that Indian poster, who would insist and object that when someone makes a point that people live paycheque to paycheque in America?

He claimed that was no problem because of the high wages.

He was so funny, and kind of curious, because he was either really dumb or just really good at lying straight at us.

:D

Okay,, here is the rant ...

The basic point of people living paycheck to paycheck, is the money is not flowing to them. It is flowing into someone else's pocket. That makes sense.

Some struggle to make ends make, while the rich get richer.

Here is the problem, which is the next step in the analysis because that is reality.

Since the rich get richer, they start to squeeze out the ones living paycheque to paycheque.

For example, the price of a new car in America is $50,000 USD, which is a lot.

The rich can afford it, while those living paycheque to paycheque obviously cannot, they cannot even afford a new $30,000 USD car, if there was one.

This is what is known sort of like, the invisible hand, or more modern tern, market forces.

So due to market forces, those living paycheck to paycheck will continue to get squeezed. They cannot afford a new car, they cannot afford rent (because rents go up due to rich people buying up all the property then it is the same rich people goes all NIMBY with no new development, and free immigration).

The proof is in the data, or so we are told. The percentage of Americans living paycheck to paycheck continues to rise. That means they getting squeezed, squeezed towards that kill line down there.

That is why I found that Indian guy so ridiculous but interesting.

Him saying that people living paycheck to paycheck is not a problem in America, because of high wages, has a ring of truth, because there are high wages.

The glaring problem is, he thinks none of us has ever heard of market forces.

But bring that up, and he would say something else just a ridiculous, so he get banned! Haha!

Ever since they banned his ass, never came across anyone as outrageous as he was, with his constant misrepresentations of all things and everything. LOL!

:oops::D
Invisible Hand is just a euphemism for market manipulators, banks, oligarchs so they don't get the blame for wrecking people's lives.
 

plawolf

Lieutenant General
Trump doesn't like Iran's response.

China is not overconfident. It's the US regime that's hopelessly stuck in the Iran war quagmire.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
OslXMbs.jpg

This guy knows about Alex's kill line meme but throughout the whole article he is not able to offer up any arguments why it's not valid. Best he could do is:


It's not just me, in the guy's twitter thread other people have also noticed it and are calling him out on this:

It's why Alex's observations in Seattle are so impactful. You can character assassinate him as much as you like but no one has yet been able to offer any rebuttal to what he's saying.

Oh, China might be a little over confident, but not in the way the western MSM would have the sheeple think.

The defining characteristic of China’s strategy towards America, especially in instances of American own goals rather than deliberate Chinese moves, is one of restraint and patience. Where rather than seizing on opportunities and making maximum gains, China is instead preferring to manage America’s decline in a measured stepped approach instead of seeking a spectacular knock-out blow.

There are near countless examples where China could have easily seized on American mistakes and really heaped on the pressure for minimal cost, but instead it had chosen to do nothing or even actively help America out to prevent a potentially uncontrollable collapse.

That is the behaviour of a power that has near absolute confidence in its own ability to prevail, so isn’t desperately seeking to exploit every unexpected advantage to maximum effect. So China’s primary consideration isn’t about winning, it’s about minimising the risks and costs of it winning by always giving the Americans a viable option to back down instead of cornering them in a now-or-never choice where they feel that total defeat and the end of their nation is imminent so there is minimal downside to dragging everyone else down with them.

That may prove to be a slight misstep where China maybe should have been more ruthless and daring in pressing its advantages, but then again, China never had a use-it-or-lose it choice, it still has all the cards it could have used still to use, which to be frank, is more than enough to win in its neighbourhood. All the while that direct, overt confrontation is avoided, more and more powerful cards are being readied. So logically it makes perfect sense to not bet an a chance maybe when all you need to do is play for time and soon you will have a slam dunk win no matter what your opponent does.
 

plawolf

Lieutenant General

Seems things are tough in India.

Why no buy gold though? They scared it will screw over the Forex which in turn screws over buying stuff like oil?

As with Covid, India is being the proverbial canary and early warning to the west of the incoming damage that will soon hit them from oil and gas shortages.

As for why asking people not to buy gold, it’s because most of India’s gold is imported, so the common people buying gold like crazy will see a massive outflow of ForEx from Indian banks, which could trigger a bank run if they run low, and even if they don’t, it will empty their coffers and massively limit their ability to buy increasingly scare and more expensive oil and gas on the open market as no one wants rupees.
 

shiftenter

Junior Member
Registered Member
Japanese potato chip maker changing package to monochrome due to lack of paint, which itself is a subproduct of naphtha.

1778500511024.png

For reference:
1778500525215.png

1778500664704.png
They even made a note that reads 「石油原料節約パッケージ」which means "this package saves petrochemicals".

The situation is looking increasingly similar as WW2 Japan:
1778500928766.png
 

sheogorath

Colonel
Registered Member
I get America being xenophobic to outsiders but at least show some damn consistency. At least India does that consistently by screwing over ALL foreign companies than enter it.

There is something to be said about how US companies that become fully captured by israeli interest through private equities, end up with a Indian C-cuites, particularly CEO's and similar.
 
Top