Miscellaneous News

AssassinsMace

AssassinsMace

Lieutenant General

This was the same guy that said if someone Jewish walked out in the street at night and felt unsafe, an act of antisemitism was committed against Jews. Who committed the crime to persecute for antisemitism...? That's how crazy their logic is.


You know how people say other people don't have a self-filter that suppose to stop people from saying or doing things that can be seen as wrong? They take it further where they're going to intentionally do what any sane and reasonable person would say is wrong to do like it was out of spite. There's no sign of a conscience at work. It's like how Jews seem to want to have 1.4 billion Chinese hate them despite how the Chinese don't have a historical context of hating Jews like some of their closest allies do. Do they want everyone to hate them? They used China's doing nothing over Oct. 7th as an excuse to label China as antisemitic. And they don't use their influence in the US to steer away any anti-Chinese attitudes. The sympathy they expect to be given to them... they don't give themselves. They don't have to just like China doesn't have to... but they're labelling China antisemitic and expects everyone who'll listen to them to act against China on their behalf for it. The fact is they've been acting against Chinese long before. In the run up to the 1882 Chinese Exclusion Act, the Jews let the Klan use their synagogues so they can organize anti-Chinese demonstrations. And they're suppose to know something about that kind of stuff where an entire people are persecuted wrongly. And I bet they would answer by saying there was nothing wrong about it. Why do I get to assume that when it goes against any common sense of what someone civilized would say? When I was in college, there was someone in a discussion group I was in who said that Jews were the only victims of WWII. I said there were other victims and more Chinese civilians were killed than how many Jews died in the Holocaust. And what was his spiteful answer? "But there are so many of you..." It's not like they don't have a filter where they wouldn't know what a filter is because they expect that filter on everyone for them.

Normally you wouldn't label a whole people being that way but there is a definite anti-China shift to vilify everything Chinese especially in today's context. When it comes to the AI race, it's not really the US versus China. It's Israel versus China. Who's behind US AI and how Israel is using it? Look at who are the faces of denying China AI in the US. The reason why they wanted to take away TikTok from the Chinese is the same reasons why they don't want China having AI. Even Netanyahu mentions why it was important to take away TikTok from China. AI is a super version of what TikTok can do. To the least, the Chinese have the right to not give any sympathy. If the Chinese hate, it's not because some religion told the Chinese to which is ironic because guess who also fights for Christians' freedom of religion in China who are also the number one instigator of antisemitism in the world...? Is it because of religious beliefs? And the narrative they use to scare everyone from Islam is they're radical religious zealots out to impose their beliefs on everyone else...
 
Thecore

Thecore

Junior Member
Registered Member
FriedButter said:
Introducing the new “Gambling” Credit Card. Where you might not get charged for the transaction. Except it isn’t randomized. The card company gets to pick and choose what they make “free” under the terms and conditions,

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2052404971979550871
Click to expand...
Trump really is Biff Tannen from Back to the Future 2. The writers of that movie predicted the future of their own country perfectly.

maxresdefault.jpg
 
horse

horse

Brigadier
Registered Member

Forget if this was posted.

If this Prof Scott Galloway guy wants to see the China US relationship go the other way, then the American elite has their doubts.

Probably will not happen for a lot of reasons. The primary one is that China probably wants to keep the Americans at arms length, and out of the neighbourhood.

Then they talked about Chinese cars and the EV industry a little.

Then a discussion about cities, and if we follow China close enough, we realize that is what makes Chinese cities tick! Because that is what cities are! They are true engines of economic growth. Have good cities, and you will have an economy that really has a chance.

Now, what makes a good city. That is an interesting question. Myself, more interested in NIMBY than anything else.

NIMBY!

NIMBY

NIMBY now!

:D
 
horse

horse

Brigadier
Registered Member

Forget if this was posted.

If this Prof Scott Galloway guy wants to see the China US relationship go the other way, then the American elite has their doubts.

Probably will not happen for a lot of reasons. The primary one is that China probably wants to keep the Americans at arms length, and out of the neighbourhood.

Then they talked about Chinese cars and the EV industry a little.

Then a discussion about cities, and if we follow China close enough, we realize that is what makes Chinese cities tick! Because that is what cities are! They are true engines of economic growth. Have good cities, and you will have an economy that really has a chance.

Now, what makes a good city. That is an interesting question. Myself, more interested in NIMBY than anything else.

NIMBY!

NIMBY

NIMBY now!

:D
 
broadsword

broadsword

Brigadier
horse said:

Forget if this was posted.

If this Prof Scott Galloway guy wants to see the China US relationship go the other way, then the American elite has their doubts.

Probably will not happen for a lot of reasons. The primary one is that China probably wants to keep the Americans at arms length, and out of the neighbourhood.

Then they talked about Chinese cars and the EV industry a little.

Then a discussion about cities, and if we follow China close enough, we realize that is what makes Chinese cities tick! Because that is what cities are! They are true engines of economic growth. Have good cities, and you will have an economy that really has a chance.

Now, what makes a good city. That is an interesting question. Myself, more interested in NIMBY than anything else.

NIMBY!

NIMBY

NIMBY now!

:D
Click to expand...

It was posted right before this one.
 
horse

horse

Brigadier
Registered Member
Thecore said:
Trump really is Biff Tannen from Back to the Future 2. The writers of that movie predicted the future of their own country perfectly.

View attachment 174597
Click to expand...

Kind of like back to the past, as that was New York 5th Avenue back in the day, New York, greatest city on earth!

Sort of like this, just the last part.

New York City!

 
Phead128

Phead128

Major
Staff member
Moderator - World Affairs
tamsen_ikard said:
I agree. Russia simply cannot win against the full might of the western empire supporting ukraine in every way possible.

Ukraine is mainly supplying man power, but its is the west that is supplying all the weapons, all the money, all the equipment.

Drone warfare as also allowed ukraine to do things onlry superpowers could do in terms of deep strikes.
rt
Drone warfare has also neutralized mechanized ground invasion and basically made the battlefield stagnant.

If Russia was just fighting Ukraine, then they could hope that ukraine would run out of resources at somepoint and forced to surrender just like ww2 western front.

But ukraine had pretty unlimited supplies thanks to the west. So, russia would be slowly at a disadvantage as time goes on.
Click to expand...

Stalemate was due to heavy artillery with drone target intel, not suicidal drones itself. It was artillery + drone Intel that stopped the mechanized ground forces. I remember artillery + DJI drones was the hot topic long before Shahed, Bayraktar drones were introduced. Even HIMARs was huge game changer long before Switchblade drone was sent. We were talking about artillery round manufacturing between NATO vs Russia and how Ukraine sourcing Chinese DJI drones long before Cope Cages became a meme. +70% of casualties is due to artillery. Initial drones were low rates of production and susceptible to jamming until the fiber optics FPV drones introduced much much later but even by then, the stalemate occurred less than 1-2 months after start of invasion due to artillery. Those drones still have to contend with Cope Cages and Cope Nets which ironically quite effective against most non-tandem charge drones.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top