View attachment 172698
Following up on that, SOYO claims WJ-10 should be of atleast similar performance to PW150A. It is expected to be atleast 30 percent lighter in dryweight compared to WJ-6 while also having atleast 25 percent less PSFC at cruise, it should have a power rating of approximately 3700-3800kW which is similar to the latest WJ-6 variant.
As for the differences between WJ-10 and AEP400/500, it's still too early to say for sure but SOYO personally thinks they only merely share a similar architecture (ie. two shaft free power turbine) but have different performance requirements and external differences.
SOYO's list of turboprop engines and power output
View attachment 172699
Note, apparently WJ-6s on Y-9 actually don't have a 3800kW rating instead only somewhere close to 3400kW, only the special variant for KJ-600 (WJ-6X) reaches that rating. While the commercially certified one on AG600M is even worse at 3200kW.
Specs for WJ-6, probably the commercial variant
View attachment 172700
Max takeoff power is ~3200kW and continuous is only 2700kW, while takeoff PSFC is a horrendous 0.33kg/kWh compared to ~0.262kg/kWh of PW150 series and AEP400/500's smaller than 0.258kg/kWh target. It also has a ridiculously high dryweight of 1200kg compared to only 725kg of the PW150A.
View attachment 172703
He also commented in another post about AEWC that until another newer, more economical platform like C919 or the rumored 200t class multimission platform appears, it is in his opinion prudent to quickly replace the WJ-6s in KJ-500/700s with WJ-10s in the next 2-3 years to give a massive boost to flight performance and effective combat radius.