2026 Israel - Iranian conflict [TEMP LOCKED]

Will Iran-Israel conflict start again?

  • Total voters
    155
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
T

TPenglake

Junior Member
Registered Member
_killuminati_ said:
But it is US invading, not Iraq. Remember also, Iran is not invincible - it was invaded & occupied by both Russia and Britain less than a century ago.
View attachment 170993
View attachment 170994
It's been done in the past already.
Click to expand...
What does history from a century ago have anything to do with this? That's like saying since China's eastern provinces were conquered by Japan during WW2, the US has an equal chance of succeeding in pulling of the same feat today.

Nevermind Iran's arsenal and current performance, invading Iran would be an undertaking unlike anything the US has done before. Like the country has 90 million people and is four times bigger than California. Trump has pissed off NATO so much they're unlikely to contribute like they did in Afghanistan and Iraq, so a hypothetical invasion force will be solely American and Israeli, and perhaps whatever militia mercanaries they can scrounge up. How would America assemble, domestically, a force of that size without massive backlash from both sides of the political aisle?
 
M

MMelon

New Member
Registered Member
_killuminati_ said:
Eyewitness Indian from Israel claims Israel is hiding casualties. "100ft deep bunkers and people killed in them by missile strikes".
https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2030140097333710871


Nothing lasts forever, but that invasion was successful.
Click to expand...
It's refreshing to see one of them supporting truth instead of pushing lies. And occupations only last as long as invaders are strong enough to hold on. This has been true for empires throughout history. In this case, let us hope they will be weakened enough not to be able to do so.
Randomuser said:
The point is although Iran has terrain advantages, that does not guarantee anything. It needs to be smart and make the best use of them to crush its enemies. At the very least even if it goes down, it needs to hurt the US to a point where US can't really recover from that damage for a long while.
Click to expand...
Nothing is ever guaranteed. The hope here is that they maximize the cost to invaders, minimize the cost to themselves, and make this as untenable for invaders as possible.
 
T

tokenanalyst

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
The religious component of this war is becoming unavoidable. For one side you have Bibi and his right wing party looking for the promise land, but you can almost understand it even it is despicable because human ambition. The Iranians as Muslims it seem is their duty to defend themselves and specially when someone killed their max religious leader, say whatever you want but most Catholics wont be happy if someone kill the Pope. And then there is the US and different from what the MSM told you for years, the US is maybe the religious extremist here.
 
M

MMelon

New Member
Registered Member
TPenglake said:
What does history from a century ago have anything to do with this? That's like saying since China's eastern provinces were conquered by Japan during WW2, the US has an equal chance of succeeding in pulling of the same feat today.

Nevermind Iran's arsenal and current performance, invading Iran would be an undertaking unlike anything the US has done before. Like the country has 90 million people and is four times bigger than California. Trump has pissed off NATO so much they're unlikely to contribute like they did in Afghanistan and Iraq, so a hypothetical invasion force will be solely American and Israeli, and perhaps whatever militia mercanaries they can scrounge up. How would America assemble, domestically, a force of that size without massive backlash from both sides of the political aisle?
Click to expand...
I highly recommend you edit your post to remove the big C word before something bad happens to you. It's the new dirty word.
 
T

tokenanalyst

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
Randomuser said:
The point is although Iran has terrain advantages, that does not guarantee anything. It needs to be smart and make the best use of them to crush its enemies. At the very least even if it goes down, it needs to hurt the US to a point where US can't really recover from that damage for a long while.
Click to expand...
Is looks like one way only ticked. If you lose your supply lines in such large mountainous terrain, it will be like the Battle of the Teutoburg Forest or Stalingrad.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top