Chinese air to air missiles

bsdnf

Senior Member
Registered Member
I don't really expect to see the J-20 publicly displaying the PL-16 with its IWB open at the Zhuhai Airshow; that's not typical of the PLA.

More likely, we'll see a small ramdom fighter model carrying a strange missile, like the YJ-15. Or a J-16D using dual-rail pylon to carry multiple PL-15s, as indirect evidence that the PL-15 has been modified into an anti-radiation missile.
 

doggydogdo

Junior Member
Registered Member
I don't really expect to see the J-20 publicly displaying the PL-16 with its IWB open at the Zhuhai Airshow; that's not typical of the PLA.

More likely, we'll see a small ramdom fighter model carrying a strange missile, like the YJ-15. Or a J-16D using dual-rail pylon to carry multiple PL-15s, as indirect evidence that the PL-15 has been modified into an anti-radiation missile.
Why is dual rail pylon indirect evidence that PL-15 is used for anti-radiation?
 

TheWanderWit

Junior Member
Registered Member
Why is dual rail pylon indirect evidence that PL-15 is used for anti-radiation?
I'm assuming that he means that if a J-16D is seen carrying such a setup, its meant to be/imply its the ARM variant, given it wouldn't really make any sense for a J-16D to be carrying 4 regular PL-15 BVRAAMs as if its a fighter doing some air superiority mission. But I would assume maybe if they did though, it would be seen with the name for the ARM version, which I believe is LD-8A, so the evidence of it being dual-racked isn't as relevant as just seeing the designation for the ARM variant itself.
 

defenceman

Junior Member
Registered Member
Hi,
another possibility for not properly showing around with PL16 or any official hint for
PL17 or display with fighters must be until unless USA start strapping AIM 260, so
until we see this with USAF or Navy china is pretty much ok with PL15 strapping around
and know one really knows the actual PL15(Chinese version) range or if I’m missing the official
Chinese version of PL15.(Chinese )
thank you
 

siegecrossbow

Field Marshall
Staff member
Super Moderator
Key advantage of PL-16 is that it is compact enough to be stored within weapon bay in high numbers. What’s the point of showing it as a flex and reveal China’s design philosophy on latest AAM? Keep in mind that before 2023 there was zero, zero image or video of PL-15 being fired live despite the fact that it has been in service for the better part of part of seven years. I expect the same level of secrecy around PL-16 unless they want to make a statement.
 

Blitzo

General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
Key advantage of PL-16 is that it is compact enough to be stored within weapon bay in high numbers. What’s the point of showing it as a flex and reveal China’s design philosophy on latest AAM? Keep in mind that before 2023 there was zero, zero image or video of PL-15 being fired live despite the fact that it has been in service for the better part of part of seven years. I expect the same level of secrecy around PL-16 unless they want to make a statement.

In the case of PL-15 though, we did get images of it in testing fairly early on and its official reveal didn't take that much longer either.

If there is something in the form factor of PL-16 which is important to conceal then fair enough, but a fly by with mockups is not out of the question given the stage that the program is at by now.

Whether they'll choose to do so is another matter.
 

siegecrossbow

Field Marshall
Staff member
Super Moderator
In the case of PL-15 though, we did get images of it in testing fairly early on and its official reveal didn't take that much longer either.

If there is something in the form factor of PL-16 which is important to conceal then fair enough, but a fly by with mockups is not out of the question given the stage that the program is at by now.

Whether they'll choose to do so is another matter.
Yeah because they had to test it on J-11B and it can’t be avoided. If the J-20 were the test vehicle we wouldn’t know anything about the basic form until PL-15 is ready for export.

I think the planform for PL-16 actually matters a lot. How many control surfaces does it have, for instance? Does it have minimal set of fins to reduce drag but compensate using thrust vectoring or does it have additional pair of fins but collapsed like they do on new model PL-15E? It could show adversaries the design philosophy as well as which tradeoffs were made to boost certain performance parameters.
 

Blitzo

General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
Yeah because they had to test it on J-11B and it can’t be avoided. If the J-20 were the test vehicle we wouldn’t know anything about the basic form until PL-15 is ready for export.

Well, we had PL-15 shown in the 200X prototypes pretty early on as well from memory.


I think the planform for PL-16 actually matters a lot. How many control surfaces does it have, for instance? Does it have minimal set of fins to reduce drag but compensate using thrust vectoring or does it have additional pair of fins but collapsed like they do on new model PL-15E? It could show adversaries the design philosophy as well as which tradeoffs were made to boost certain performance parameters.

I agree to an extent, but those are also things that did apply to PL-15 as well.

Unless PL-16 has some sort of unique new technology that is very obvious via external appearances that they want to keep hidden, I think under previous circumstances we should be expecting a visual reveal at some point (official or unofficial) in the near future.
The big reason to keep it more secret imo, is general opsec now is probably a bit higher in some ways than the early 2010s.
 
Top