North Korea Military News, Reports, Data, etc.

secretciaagent

Just Hatched
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
The article claims that Russia is desperate for Korean missiles, but then just uses them for some random terrorizing of civilians. It claims the KN-23 is a clone of the Iskander, but can't hit anything.. until it suddenly can. It claims that 50% of the missiles fail, even though all of the DPRKs solid fueled ICBMs seem to work just fine. It tries to sell us on 300 missiles being important, without mentioning how many thousands of missiles Russia has launched so far in the conflict.

When an article is being so obviously dishonest I don't see how you can trust ANY of the information provided. It is also a classic example trying to present your enemy two ways. They want the DPRK to be strong/dangerous but also weak/incompetent.
 

montyp165

Senior Member
The article claims that Russia is desperate for Korean missiles, but then just uses them for some random terrorizing of civilians. It claims the KN-23 is a clone of the Iskander, but can't hit anything.. until it suddenly can. It claims that 50% of the missiles fail, even though all of the DPRKs solid fueled ICBMs seem to work just fine. It tries to sell us on 300 missiles being important, without mentioning how many thousands of missiles Russia has launched so far in the conflict.

When an article is being so obviously dishonest I don't see how you can trust ANY of the information provided. It is also a classic example trying to present your enemy two ways. They want the DPRK to be strong/dangerous but also weak/incompetent.
It's the same fascist propaganda playbook they use on anybody who they consider an opponent, hence the same fallacious presentations on organization and capability.
 
Top