Miscellaneous News

tokenanalyst

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
I was told that the US wargame is deliberately designed as "being very hard on themselves", thats why the result means nothing and the US is still much stronger than China. I was also told that there is hidden technology in Area 51 that far surpassed any human intelligence, this is why the F-47 is still in the PPT stage.
I think the Pentagon has been REALLY underestimating the size and growth rate of China arsenal for decades and they are NOT taking into account the civilian participation in a war effort, that could be massive if there is a mobilization.
 

Randomuser

Major
Registered Member
Americans should question corruption in their own military. There was a recent case of a low-level civilian employee who got caught stealing over $100M from the military using the very low tech method of depositing cheques meant for military families straight into her own bank account. The most concerning part is that it's not even the military that caught her but the IRS due to her buying too many expensive mansions.

It's scary to think how actual effective actual higher up people in the US military can steal money with more sophisticated money laundering techniques, if an obvious case like this one didn't even get caught by their system.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
A lot of people think if the generals don't get charged with corruption then that means there must be no corruption.

I mean that's one way to think about it. But that's very surface level and dangerous mindset.
 

montyp165

Senior Member
I think the Pentagon has been REALLY underestimating the size and growth rate of China arsenal for decades and they are NOT taking into account the civilian participation in a war effort, that could be massive if there is a mobilization.
Not only that, the truest level of comprehensive compentence shows itself at the bottom level upwards, not only at the top, which is why the US underestimation of Chinese capabilities is bigger than just ordnance stockpiles.
 

siegecrossbow

Field Marshall
Staff member
Super Moderator
A lot of people think if the generals don't get charged with corruption then that means there must be no corruption.

I mean that's one way to think about it. But that's very surface level and dangerous mindset.

Obviously naming both the next gen fighter and a whole class of warship after the current living president is not corruption at all.
 

drebin052

New Member
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

...doesn't seem like much has changed with the Department of Defense War's strategic goals. BBC just being hyperbolic as usual with their headlines, but that's the standard for pommie propaganda, I suppose.

I can see LoE #1 being successful since Trump's hell-bent on crowing himself as governor of the new South America Trading Company of the unified Americas. Rubio and Miller will have no difficulty becoming viceroys of South and North America (respectively).

LoE #3 remains to be seen since EU countries are increasing spending, but not in the way that will benefit the U.S. in the long run.

LoE #4 is 100% going to fail like all administrations before Trump (including his first administration). The corruption issues and grifting that plagued the American defence industry
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, and will only get worse now that the AI techbros are involved.

Which leaves LoE #2...containing China but also not confronting China...somehow. Which is an oxymoron since the NDS states that the DoW will "[...] build, posture, and sustain a strong denial defense along the FIC." You can't achieve that without confronting China, so nothing has fundamentally changed from the Biden administration.
 

delfer

Junior Member
Registered Member
A lot of people think if the generals don't get charged with corruption then that means there must be no corruption.

I mean that's one way to think about it. But that's very surface level and dangerous mindset.
The U.S. legalized bribery within its own government by simply classifying it as ‘corporate lobbying’. They’re the masters of corruption. Every single person within its military and political leadership is corrupt.
 

siegecrossbow

Field Marshall
Staff member
Super Moderator
America legalized bribery within its own government by simply classifying it as ‘corporate lobbying’. They’re the masters of corruption. Every single person within its military and political leadership is corrupt.

It’s worse than that. With the possible exception of Macron almost every member of the rule based disorder elites is complicit in ritualistic kid diddling.
 

Puss in Boots

Junior Member
Registered Member
The U.S. legalized bribery within its own government by simply classifying it as ‘corporate lobbying’. They’re the masters of corruption. Every single person within its military and political leadership is corrupt.
While I understand that there have been numerous cases of corruption involving Chinese military personnel in business dealings over the past few decades, the sheer number of high-ranking officers falling from grace still surprises me.

Western media deliberately misrepresent China's anti-corruption campaign as a purge of political enemies simply because they dare not delve into how those convicted officials were defined as corrupt. If American government officials were judged by Chinese standards, I believe that executing all officials would be without error.
 

AssassinsMace

Lieutenant General
All of Trump’s minions are on TV trying to spin the embarrassment of the Greenland issue as China and Russia trying to control trade routes. Trade to who? Except for Russia, all the countries around the Arctic are pro-US. Is China going through the Arctic to ship goods to Africa and South America? China and Russia don’t need the Arctic to trade with each other. Remember, China had no problem transiting through the Red Sea while it was for the West.

The US wondered why China would need a navy when the US was protecting trade routes. And that’s exactly why China would need a military in general.
 
Top