Yeah, but those things always exists everywhere to a major or lesser degree and things are bound to fail when one faction gets open support and the other just gets speeches and legalese instead of support as well, so you end with the obvious result.If you have corruption and infighting, you have opened the doors to external threats. It's an age old concept that has been exploited, rinsed and repeated endlessly.
The analogy falls by virtue of the difference in geopolitical dynamics, what requires to mount a workable defense nowadays against the US and back then.Again, you missed the point. The caliph was fed gold to remind him that had he used the gold to prepare his defense, instead of hoarding it, he wouldn't be in this position. Counter example is the Turk Mamluks of Egypt who annihilated the advancing Mongols. Or a more modern example: North Korea? Put all their money on nukes and missiles - now nobody in the West wants to interfere.
And even then, it wasn't guaranteed either. The Great Wall didn't stop China from getting ruled by the Mongols, did it?
They share the societal control aspect(Burkhas, women are subhuman, etc.) and one inspired the other in this regardDeobandi is a Hanafi movement. Wahhabi is a Hanbali movement. These are distant ideologies.
Frankenstein didn't make Deobandi.
Anyways, blaming achieves nothing. It's a moot behavior. Nobody denies Western imperialism.
My door lock broke so I left it broken. My home got robbed. Now I can do one of two things: 1) fix the lock, or 2) leave the lock broken and blame the thief.
This is such a simplification and completely ignores the dynamics within Latin America and other areas, specially the US near constant presence in the former through many aspects. How about the thief also stole your credit card, froze your accounts, has you besieged with the rest of the gang and the person that should sell you the locks is only saying you should call the cops instead and after the cops have taken your report, then maybe, they will sell you the locks.
I honestly am surprised how the effects of Opium War and WW2 gets brought up to point out its long term effects in many aspect of Asia, but the US constant invasions and couping since 1899 up until the 00's gets handwaved with "suck it up and deal with it, is not that bad"
I mean, if money runs out and western society and politics collapse to the point overt antisemites sneak on, the Zionists don't have a choice.I don’t believe that is possible since Zionists pretty much own major institutions in those said countries that fund Israel. Banking and finance in the West is virtually a Zionist invention. It doesn't stop there - lot of big tech and media is also Zionist, specifically Jewish Zionist.
Even if any government ceased aiding Israel out of government funds, I'm certain these other Jewish-owned enterprises would be happy to fill the void (of which I bet they already are major financiers under the table; Balfour Declaration by Britain was written to a Jewish Banking family who has never resided in Israel).
Trying to extrapolate Panama, which is a US creation formed basically the same way Hong Kong as a separate entity did("gives us the land and or we will fuck you up") with the rest of Latin America is silly.It's not a surprise why most Latin countries remain stuck in the endless cycle of poverty, crime, prostitution, and corruption because they are truly incapable (not all) of exercising COMMON SENSE!